Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of remnant primary forests on ant and dung beetle species diversity in a secondary forest in Sarawak, Malaysia

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropical landscape structures have been transformed into mosaic structures consisting of small patches of primary and secondary forests, and areas of other land use. Diversity of insect assemblages is often higher in primary forests than in surrounding secondary forests. However, little is known about how the primary forests affect diversity in surrounding secondary forests in a landscape. In Sarawak, Malaysia, the typical landscape in areas from which lowland tropical rainforests had originally spread consists mainly of primary and secondary forests, with small areas of cultivation. In this study, we examined how the proportion of remnant primary forests in a landscape affects species diversity and species composition of ants and dung beetles in Macaranga-dominated secondary forests. The proportions were quantified based on remote-sensing data at various spatial scales, ranging from 100- to 5,000-m radius from each of the target forests. We found that the proportions of remnant primary forests within a 100-m radius had a significant positive effect on ant species diversity, and those within 100-, 300-, and 500-m radii significantly affected species compositions. However, the proportions of remnant primary forests had no significant relationship with dung beetle diversity, while those within 100- and 1,000-m radii had significant effects on species composition. The different responses to the remnant primary forests are likely to be related to differences in the movement and dispersal traits between the two taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen AN, Sparling GP (1997) Ants as indicators of restoration success: relationship with soil microbial biomass in the Australian seasonal tropics. Restor Ecol 5:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chust G, Pretus JL, Ducrot D, Ventura D (2004) Scale dependency of insect assemblages in response to landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 19:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauber J, Bengtsson J, Lenoir L (2006) Evaluating effects of habitat loss and land-use continuity on ant species richness in seminatural grassland remnants. Conserv Biol 20:1150–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AJ, Sutton SL (1997) A dung beetle that feeds on fig: implications for the measurement of species rarity. J Trop Ecol 13:759–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott NC, Kieckhefer RW, Lee JH, French BW (1998) Influence of within-field and landscape factors on aphid predator populations in wheat. Landsc Ecol 14:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R, Meritt D Jr (1994) Non flying mammals and landscape changes in the tropical rain forest region of Los Tlixtlas, Mexico. Ecography 17:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada A, Anzures A, Coates-Estrada R (1999) Tropical rain forest fragmentation, howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), and dung beetles at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Am J Primatol 48:253–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca GAB (1989) Small mammal species diversity in brazilian tropical primary and secondary forests of different sizes. Revta Bras Zool 6:381–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Hernandez MIM, Barlow J, Peres CA (2008) Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for neotropical dung beetles. J Appl Ecol 45:883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J, Sheil D (2010) Tropical rain forest ecology, diversity, and conservation. Oxford University Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1980) Movement patterns in dung beetles and in the dung fly. Anim Behav 28:953–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen ID, Fahrig L (1997) Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure. Landsc Ecol 12:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto-Yamada K, Itioka T, Nakagawa M, Momose K, Nakashizuka T (2011) Phytophagous scarabaeid diversity in swidden cultivation landscapes in Sarawak, Malaysia. Raffles B Zool 59:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Ghazoul J, Butler RA, Laurance WF, Sodhi NS, Mateo-Vega J, Bradshaw CJA (2010) Wash and spin cycle threats to tropical biodiversity. Biotropica 42:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai T, Saitoh TM, Sato Y, Takahashi H, Manfroi OJ, Morooka T, Kuraji K, Suzuki M, Yasunari T, Komatsu H (2005) Annual water balance and seasonality of evapotranspiration in a Bornean tropical rainforest. Agric For Meteorol 128:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai T, Yoshifuji N, Tanaka N, Suzuki M, Kume T (2009) Comparison of soil moisture dynamics between a tropical rain forest and a tropical seasonal forest in Southeast Asia: impact of seasonal and year-to-year variations in rainfall. Water Resour Res 45:W04413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JSH, Lee IQW, Lim SLH, Huijbregts J, Sodhi NS (2009) Changes in dung beetle communities along a gradient of tropical forest disturbance in South-East Asia. J Trop Ecol 25:677–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyequien E, Verrelst J, Slot M, Schaepman-Strub G, Heitkonig IMA, Skidmore A (2007) Capturing the fugitive: applying remote sensing to terrestrial animal distribution and diversity. Int J Appl Earth Observ 9:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucey JM, Hill JK (2012) Spillover of insects from rain forest into adjacent oil palm plantations. Biotropica 44:369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger D, Pfeiffer M (2011) Partitioning the impact of abiotic factors and spatial patterns on species richness and community structure of ground ant assemblages in four Bornean rainforests. Ecography 34:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amequita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Conserv 141:1461–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J (2010) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelp/vegan.html. Accessed 1 June 2010

  • Otronen M, Hanski I (1983) Movement patterns in Sphaeridium: differences between species, sexes, and feeding and breeding individuals. J Anim Ecol 52:663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters C, Molet M (2010) Colonial reproduction and life histories. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland J, Taylor PD (1997) Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales. Nature 386:710–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth DS, Perfecto I, Rathcke B (1994) The effects of management-systems on ground-foraging ant diversity in Costa-Rica. Ecol Appl 4:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Heredia C, Andresen E, Zarate DA (2010) Secondary seed dispersal by dung beetles in a Colombian rain forest: effects of dung type and defecation pattern on seed fate. J Trop Ecol 26:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze CH, Waltert M, Kessler PJA, Pitopang R, Shahabuddin VD, Muhlenberg M, Gradstein SR, Leuschner C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: comparing plants, birds, and insects. Ecol Appl 14:1321–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin VD, Schulze CH, Tscharntke T (2005) Changes of dung beetle communities from rainforests towards agroforestry systems and annual cultures in Sulawesi (Indonesia). Biodivers Conserv 14:863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin VD, Hidayat P, Manuwoto S, Noerdjito WA, Tscharntke T, Schulze CH (2010) Diversity and body size of dung beetles attracted to different dung types along a tropical land-use gradient in Sulawesi, Indonesia. J Trop Ecol 26:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suni SS, Gordon DM (2010) Fine-scale genetic structure and dispersal distance in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Heredity 104:168–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Türke M, Fiala B, Linsenmair KE, Feldhaar H (2010) Estimation of dispersal distances of the obligately plant-associated ant Crematogaster decamera. Ecol Entomol 35:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood EC, Fisher BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biol Conserv 132:166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ursula CB, Peter H, Gregor W, Iris L, Markus H (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm 58:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdu JR, Numa C, Hernandez-Cuba O (2011) The influence of landscape structure on ants and dung beetles diversity in a Mediterranean savanna-forest ecosystem. Ecol Indic 11:831–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ (2005) Tropical forests in a changing environment. Trends Ecol Evol 20:553–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ, Muller-Landau HC (2006) The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica 38:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our study was conducted in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Sarawak Forestry Corporation and the Japan Research Consortium for Tropical Forests in Sarawak in November 2005. We thank Mohd. Shahabudin Sabki (Sarawak Forest Department), and Lucy Chong and Het Kaliang (Sarawak Forestry Corporation) for help with the approval procedure to gain permission to conduct the study. The manuscript benefited from comments by Tom Fayle and an anonymous reviewer. We express our deepest gratitude to Danny Lawai Kajan and his villagers for help in the field. We also thank Norio Yamamura and Shoko Sakai for their support of our study. This study was supported financially by the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (project number D-04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko Kishimoto-Yamada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kishimoto-Yamada, K., Hyodo, F., Matsuoka, M. et al. Effects of remnant primary forests on ant and dung beetle species diversity in a secondary forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. J Insect Conserv 17, 591–605 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9544-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9544-6

Keywords

Navigation