Abstract
Purpose
To compare the efficacy and accuracy of rotational angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction (3DATG) image merged with electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) vs. CT-EAM.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, parallel, two-center study conducted in 36 patients (25 men, age 65 ± 10 years) undergoing AF ablation (33 % paroxysmal, 67 % persistent) guided by 3DATG (group 1) vs. CT (group 2) image fusion with EAM. 3DATG was performed on the Philips Allura Xper FD 10 system. Procedural characteristics including time, radiation exposure, outcome, and navigation accuracy were compared between two groups.
Results
There was no significant difference between the groups in total procedure duration or time spent for various procedural steps. Minor differences in procedural characteristics were present between two centers. Segmentation and fusion time for 3DATG or CT-EAM was short and similar between both centers. Accuracy of navigation guided by either method was high and did not depend on left atrial size. Maintenance of sinus rhythm between the two groups was no different up to 24 months of follow-up.
Conclusion
This study did not find superiority of 3DATG–EAM image merge to guide AF ablation when compared to CT-EAM fusion. Both merging techniques result in similar navigation accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- 3DATG:
-
Rotational angiography with 3D reconstruction
- AF:
-
Atrial Fibrillation
- CT:
-
Computed Tomography
- EAM:
-
Electro-anatomical mapping
- EGM:
-
Electrogram
- LA:
-
Left atrium/left atrial
- PV:
-
Pulmonary vein
- CS:
-
Coronary sinus
- PVI:
-
Pulmonary Vein Isolation
References
Reddy, V. Y., Morales, G., Ahmed, H., Neuzil, P., Dukkipati, S., Kim, S., et al. (2010). Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy. Heart Rhythm, 7(11), 1644–1653.
Bertaglia, E., Bella, P. D., Tondo, C., Proclemer, A., Bottoni, N., De Ponti, R., et al. (2009). Image integration increases efficacy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: results from the CartoMerge™ Italian Registry. Europace, 11(8), 1004–1010.
Martinek, M., Nesser, H. J., Aichinger, J., Boehm, G., & Purerfellner, H. (2007). Impact of integration of multislice computed tomography imaging into three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping on clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy using radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 30(10), 1215–1223.
Li, J. H., Haim, M., Movassaghi, B., Mendel, J. B., Chaudhry, G. M., Haffajee, C. I., et al. (2009). Segmentation and registration of three-dimensional rotational angiogram on live fluoroscopy to guide atrial fibrillation ablation: a new online imaging tool. Heart Rhythm, 6(2), 231–237.
Kriatselis, C., Tang, M., Nedios, S., Roser, M., Gerds-Li, H., & Fleck, E. (2009). Intraprocedural reconstruction of the left atrium and pulmonary veins as a single navigation tool for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a feasibility, efficacy, and safety study. Heart Rhythm, 6(6), 733–741.
Carpen, M., Matkins, J., Syros, G., Gorev, M. V., Alikhani, Z., Wylie, J. V., et al. (2013). First experience of 3D rotational angiography fusion with NavX electroanatomical mapping to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 10(3), 422–427.
Nolker, G., Asbach, S., Gutleben, K. J., Rittger, H., Ritscher, G., Brachmann, J., et al. (2010). Image-integration of intraprocedural rotational angiography-based 3D reconstructions of left atrium and pulmonary veins into electroanatomical mapping: accuracy of a novel modality in atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21(3), 278–283.
Ector, J., Dragusin, O., Adriaenssens, B., Huybrechts, W., Willems, R., Ector, H., et al. (2007). Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 50(3), 234–242.
Bongartz, G., Golding, S., Jurik, A., Leonardi, M., Van Meerten, E., Geleijns, J., et al. (2000). European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Resource document. European Study Group of radiologists and physicists involved in diagnostic computed tomography. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/htmlindex.htm.
Calkins, H., Reynolds, M. R., Spector, P., Sondhi, M., Xu, Y., Martin, A., et al. (2009). Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2(4), 349–361.
Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S. A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., et al. (2010). Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 3(1), 32–38.
Knecht, S., Nault, I., Wright, M., Matsuo, S., Lellouche, N., Somasundaram, P. E., et al. (2008). Imaging in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: enhancing the clinician’s view. Europace, 10(3), iii2–iii7.
Brooks, A. G., Wilson, L., Kuklik, P., Stiles, M. K., John, B., Shashidhar, et al. (2008). Image integration using NavX Fusion: initial experience and validation. Heart Rhythm, 5(4), 526–535.
Caponi, D., Corleto, A., Scaglione, M., Blandino, A., Biasco, L., Cristoforetti, Y., et al. (2010). Ablation of atrial fibrillation: does the addition of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the left atrium to electroanatomic mapping improve the clinical outcome?: a randomized comparison of Carto-Merge vs. Carto-XP three-dimensional mapping ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace, 12(8), 1098–1104.
Knecht, S., Wright, M., Akrivakis, S., Nault, I., Matsuo, S., Chaudhry, G. M., et al. (2010). Prospective randomized comparison between the conventional electroanatomical system and three-dimensional rotational angiography during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 7(4), 459–465.
Di Biase, L., Elayi, C. S., Fahmy, T. S., Martin, D. O., Ching, C. K., Barrett, C., et al. (2009). Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies for paroxysmal patients: randomized comparison between different techniques. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2(2), 113–119.
Sra, J., Krum, D., Hare, J., Okerlund, D., Thompson, H., Vass, M., et al. (2005). Feasibility and validation of registration of three-dimensional left atrial models derived from computed tomography with a noncontact cardiac mapping system. Heart Rhythm, 2(1), 55–63.
Sra, J., Krum, D., Malloy, A., Vass, M., Belanger, B., Soubelet, E., et al. (2005). Registration of three-dimensional left atrial computed tomographic images with projection images obtained using fluoroscopy. Circulation, 112(24), 3763–3768.
Heist, E. K., Chevalier, J., Holmvang, G., Singh, J. P., Ellinor, P. T., Milan, D. J., et al. (2006). Factors affecting error in integration of electroanatomic mapping with CT and MR imaging during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 17(1), 21–27.
Narayan, S. M., Krummen, D. E., & Rappel, W. J. (2012). Clinical mapping approach to diagnose electrical rotors and focal impulse sources for human atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23(5), 447–454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at each center and registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT ID #01537237). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
John Matkins, RTR is an employee of St. Jude Medical; Dr. Michael Orlov is on the Medical Advisory Board for Philips Healthcare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anand, R., Gorev, M.V., Poghosyan, H. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of rotational angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction and computed tomography merged with electro-anatomical mapping: a two center atrial fibrillation ablation study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 46, 71–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0111-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0111-z