Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of catheter stability evaluated by VisitagTM during pulmonary vein isolation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation (Af) after ablation are still high, and repeat procedures are required in these patients. The main reason for Af recurrence is the recovery of the conduction between the pulmonary veins and left atrium. The importance of catheter stability during the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is not well studied.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contact force (CF), stable ablation time, and power during conduction blocking lesion formation for PVI.

Methods

Thirty-two consecutive drug-refractory Af patients who underwent an initial PVI using CARTO 3 and Visitag were included. The CF, ablation time, force time integral (FTI), and ablation power were recorded by Visitag. Residual conduction gap points requiring touch-up ablation after an encircling linear ablation (R point), spontaneous reconnection points (S point), and dormant conduction points (D point) were considered as non-conduction blocking lesion points. Each ablation parameter for the non-conduction blocking lesion points was compared with the other lesion points.

Results

Twenty-one points in 16 patients were considered non-conduction blocking lesions. Ten were R, eight were S, and three were D points. The CF, ablation time, FTI, and power at the non-conduction blocking lesion points and other points were 12.0 g (7.0–21.5) and 12.0 g (9.0–16.0) (P = 0.9), 7.7 s (5.6–10.1) and 12.5 s (9.4–16.8) (P < 0.05), 103.0 g*s (62.0–174.5) and 149.0 g*s (104.0–213.0) (P < 0.05), and 30.0 W (22.5–30.0) and 30.0 W (30.0–30.0) (P = 0.06), respectively.

Conclusions

Shorter ablation time recorded in Visitag lead to non-conduction blocking lesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PV:

Pulmonary vein

Af:

Atrial fibrillation

PVI:

Pulmonary vein isolation

CF:

Contact force

FTI:

Force time integral

References

  1. Haissaguerre, M., Jais, P., Shah, D. C., Takahashi, A., Hocini, M., Quiniou, G., et al. (1998). Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(10), 659–666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Camm, A. J., Lip, G. Y., De Caterina, R., Savelieva, I., Atar, D., Hohnloser, S. H., et al. (2012). 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation—developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace, 14(10), 1385–1413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. January, C. T., Wann, L. S., Alpert, J. S., Calkins, H., Cigarroa, J. E., Cleveland, J. C., Jr., et al. (2014). 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64(21), e1–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S. A., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 33(2), 171–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ouyang, F., Tilz, R., Chun, J., Schmidt, B., Wissner, E., Zerm, T., et al. (2010). Long-term results of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: lessons from a 5-year follow-up. Circulation, 122(23), 2368–2377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takigawa, M., Takahashi, A., Kuwahara, T., Okubo, K., Takahashi, Y., Watari, Y., et al. (2014). Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the incidence of recurrence and progression of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 7(2), 267–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cappato, R., Negroni, S., Pecora, D., Bentivegna, S., Lupo, P. P., Carolei, A., et al. (2003). Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 108(13), 1599–1604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nanthakumar, K., Plumb, V. J., Epstein, A. E., Veenhuyzen, G. D., Link, D., & Kay, G. N. (2004). Resumption of electrical conduction in previously isolated pulmonary veins: rationale for a different strategy? Circulation, 109(10), 1226–1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ouyang, F., Antz, M., Ernst, S., Hachiya, H., Mavrakis, H., Deger, F. T., et al. (2005). Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation, 111(2), 127–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verma, A., Kilicaslan, F., Pisano, E., Marrouche, N. F., Fanelli, R., Brachmann, J., et al. (2005). Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation, 112(5), 627–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kowalski, M., Grimes, M. M., Perez, F. J., Kenigsberg, D. N., Koneru, J., Kasirajan, V., et al. (2012). Histopathologic characterization of chronic radiofrequency ablation lesions for pulmonary vein isolation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59(10), 930–938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokoyama, K., Nakagawa, H., Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Leo, G., Aeby, N., et al. (2008). Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 1(5), 354–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy, V. Y., Shah, D., Kautzner, J., Schmidt, B., Saoudi, N., Herrera, C., et al. (2012). The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm, 9(11), 1789–1795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neuzil, P., Reddy, V. Y., Kautzner, J., Petru, J., Wichterle, D., Shah, D., et al. (2013). Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6(2), 327–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kimura, M., Sasaki, S., Owada, S., Horiuchi, D., Sasaki, K., Itoh, T., et al. (2014). Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm, 11(6), 984–991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Natale, A., Reddy, V. Y., Monir, G., Wilber, D. J., Lindsay, B. D., McElderry, H. T., et al. (2014). Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64(7), 647–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wutzler, A., Huemer, M., Parwani, A. S., Blaschke, F., Haverkamp, W., & Boldt, L. H. (2014). Contact force mapping during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: procedural data and one-year follow-up. Archives Medical Science, 10(2), 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. le Polain de Waroux, J. B., Weerasooriya, R., Anvardeen, K., Barbraud, C., Marchandise, S., De Meester, C., et al. (2015). Low contact force and force-time integral predict early recovery and dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace.

  19. Park, C. I., Lehrmann, H., Keyl, C., Weber, R., Schiebeling, J., Allgeier, J., et al. (2014). Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 25(7), 701–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Makimoto, H., Tilz, R. R., Lin, T., Rillig, A., Mathew, S., Deiss, S., et al. (2014). Incidence and anatomical locations of catheter instability during circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using contact force. International Heart Journal, 55(3), 249–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takigawa, M., Yamada, T., Yoshida, Y., Ishikawa, K., Aoyama, Y., Yamamoto, T., et al. (2014). Patterns of pulmonary vein potential disappearance during encircling ipsilateral pulmonary vein isolation can predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Circulation Journal, 78(3), 601–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takigawa, M., Kuwahara, T., Takahashi, A., Okubo, K., Takahashi, Y., Nakashima, E., et al. (2015). Simultaneous isolation of superior and inferior pulmonary veins on both the left and right sides could yield better outcomes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace, 17(5), 732–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryudo Fujiwara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujiwara, R., Imamura, K., Kijima, Y. et al. The importance of catheter stability evaluated by VisitagTM during pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 46, 161–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0103-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0103-z

Keywords

Navigation