Abstract
Purpose
Little is presently known about the outcome of atrial lesions performed with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for atrial fibrillation ablation. We aimed to assess endocardial atrial lesions 6 months after epicardial HIFU ablation (Epicor™) and to evaluate the benefit of a combined ablation approach.
Methods
Thirty patients (21 males, mean age 68 ± 12 years old) undergoing HIFU atrial fibrillation ablation during cardiac surgery were enrolled. Electrophysiological study (EPS) was performed 6 months after HIFU ablation, and endovascular radiofrequency was delivered in case of conduction gaps. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months after the EPS.
Results
At EPS, ten patients (38 %) had achieved complete or near-complete “box” isolation and four (15 %) had no visible lesion. Using this technology, freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmia at 6 months was 60 % (n = 18/30) (64 % for paroxysmal and 56 % for persistent subgroups) improving to 81 % (n = 21/26) (90 % for paroxysmal and 73 % for persistent subgroups) at 12 months after a facultative percutaneous endocardial approach was performed. Using an UltraCinch device sized below 10 improved the rate of complete lesion as assessed 6 months after surgery (58 % of complete or near-complete box isolation with UltraCinch device <10 vs 21 % when ≥11; p = 0.05).
Conclusion
Six months after HIFU ablation, only 38 % of the patients had complete or near-complete box isolation, and the recurrence rate of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia was 40 %. The latter was reduced to 19 % 6 months after complementary percutaneous approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AF:
-
Atrial fibrillation
- EPS:
-
Electrophysiological study
- HIFU:
-
High-intensity focused ultrasound
- LA:
-
Left atrium
- MI:
-
Mitral isthmus
- PV:
-
Pulmonary vein
- RF:
-
Radiofrequency
References
Camm, A. J., Lip, G. Y., De Caterina, R., Savelieva, I., Atar, D., Hohnloser, S. H., et al. (2012). 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. European Heart Journal, 33(21), 2719–2747.
Ngaage, D. L., Schaff, H. V., Barnes, S. A., Sundt, T. M., Mullany, C. J., Dearani, J. A., et al. (2006). Prognostic implications of preoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: is there an argument for concomitant arrhythmia surgery? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 82(4), 1392–1399.
Cox, J. L., Schuessler, R. B., Lappas, D. G., & Boineau, J. P. (1996). An 8 1/2-year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation. Annals of Surgery, 224(3), 267–273. discussion 273–275.
Ninet, J., Roques, X., Seitelberger, R., Deville, C., Pomar, J. L., Robin, J., et al. (2005). Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with off-pump, epicardial, high-intensity focused ultrasound: results of a multicenter trial. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 130(3), 803–809.
Groh, M. A., Binns, O. A., Burton, H. G., Ely, S. W., & Johnson, A. M. (2007). Ultrasonic cardiac ablation for atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery: long-term clinical outcomes. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 84(6), 1978–1983.
Schopka, S., Schmid, C., Keyser, A., Kortner, A., Tafelmeier, J., Diez, C., et al. (2010). Ablation of atrial fibrillation with the Epicor system: a prospective observational trial to evaluate safety and efficacy and predictors of success. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 5(34), 5–34.
McCarthy, P., Kruse, J., Shalli, S., Ilkhanoff, I., Goldberger, J. J., Kadish, A. H., et al. (2010). Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail? Implications for increasing effectiveness of ablation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 139(4), 860–867.
Villamizar, N. R., Crow, J. H., Piacentino, V., DiBernardo, L. R., Daneshmand, M. A., Bowles, D. E., et al. (2010). Reproducibility of left atrial ablation with high-intensity focused ultrasound energy in a calf model. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 140(6), 1381–13877.
Vanelli, P., Lemma, M., & Antona, C. (2010). Right mini-thoracotomy for left maze with transesophageal echo guidance. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 10(6), 843–846.
Klinkenberg, T. J., Ahmed, S., Hagen, A. T., Wiesfeld, A. C., Tan, E. S., Zijlstra, F., et al. (2009). Feasibility and outcome of epicardial pulmonary vein isolation for lone atrial fibrillation using minimal invasive surgery and high intensity focused ultrasound. Europace, 11(12), 1624–1631.
Pozzoli, A., Benussi, S., Anzil, F., Taramasso, F., Privitera, Y. A., Cianflone, D., et al. (2012). Electrophysiological efficacy of Epicor high-intensity focused ultrasound. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 42(1), 129–134.
Cappato, R., Negroni, S., Pecora, D., Bentivegna, S., Lupo, P. P., Carolei, A., et al. (2003). Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 108(13), 1599–1604.
Gaita, F., Riccardi, R., Caponi, D., Shah, D. E., Garberoglio, L., & Vivalda, L. (2005). Linear cryoablation of the left atrium versus pulmonary vein cryoisolation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: correlation of electroanatomic mapping and long-term clinical results. Circulation, 111(2), 136–142.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Jamil HAJJ CHAHINE and Pr. Luc CHRISTIAENS for their editorial assistance.
Conflict of interest
Frédéric Sacher and Pierre Jaïs received consulting fees and speaking honorarium from St. Jude Medical. Nicolas Derval received speaking honorarium from St. Jude Medical.
Funding
There was no grant support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia, R., Sacher, F., Oses, P. et al. Electrophysiological study 6 months after Epicor™ high-intensity focused ultrasound atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 41, 245–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9949-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9949-0