Skip to main content
Log in

Subject And Non-subject Relativization in Indonesian

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been claimed widely that in Indonesian the most frequent type of relative clause, that formed with the complementizer yang and with a gap in place of the relativized NP, is restricted to subject relativization. We challenge this claim and argue that complementizer/gap direct object relativization is also well formed. Furthermore, we argue against the proposal that the grammar of Indonesian contains a stipulation that complementizer/gap relativization is restricted to subjects and direct objects. Rather, the appearance of constraints which conform to the Accessibility Hierarchy of Keenan and Comrie [Linguist. Inquiry 8 (1977) 63] is due to the interaction of ECP-like restrictions on extraction with the structure of various clause types in Indonesian. Specifically, Indonesian exhibits a VP shell structure along the lines of Larson [Linguist. Inquiry 19 (1988) 335], which predicts the extraction facts. While the resulting distribution appears to conform to the Accessibility Hierarchy, there does not appear to be any motivation on the basis of the facts of Indonesian to attribute to the Accessibility Hierarchy an independent role in the grammar. Rather, the appearance of conformity to the Accessibility Hierarchy is epiphenomenal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsagoff, Lubna Shariffa (1992) Topic in Malay: the Other Subject , PhD dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Arka, I, Wayan and Christopher D. Manning (in press) “Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian: a New Perspective,” in S. Musgrave and Austin (eds.), Voice and Grammatical Functions in Austronesian Language , CSLI, Standford.

  • Butar-Butar, Maruli (1976) Some Movement Transformations and their Constraints in Indonesian , PhD dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Noam Chomsky (1995) The Minimalist Program MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandra Chung (1976) ArticleTitle“An Object Creating Rule in Bahasa Indonesia,” Linguistic Inquiry 7 41–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra (1978) “Stem Sentences in Indonesian,” in S.A. Wurm and L. Carrington (eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics : Proceedings , Fascicle 1, Western Austronesian, Pacific Linguistics, Series C, No. 61, pp. 335–365

  • Sandra Chung (1982) ArticleTitle“Unbounded Dependencies in Chamorro Grammar” Linguistic Inquiry 13 39–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandra Chung (1994) ArticleTitle“ Wh -agreement and ‘Referentiality’ in Chamorro,” Linguistic Inquiry 25 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Cole (1976) ArticleTitle“The Interface of Theory and Description: Notes on Modern Hebrew Relativization,” Language 52 563–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Cole (1976b) “An Apparent Asymmetry in the Formation of Relative Clauses in Modern Hebrew,” P Cole (Eds) Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics North-Holland Publishing Company The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Cole Hermon Gabriella (1995) “Is wh-in-situ really in-situ? Evidence from Malay and Chinese,” R. Aronovich (Eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics CSLI Stanford 189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Cole Hermon Gabriella (1998) ArticleTitle“The Typology of wh Movement: wh Questions in Malay),” Syntax 1 221–258 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9612.00009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon, and Yassir Tjung (2003) “The Formation of Relative Clauses in Jakarta Indonesian,” paper presented at ISMIL 7, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, June 2003.

  • Soenjono Dardjowidjojo (1978) Sentence Patterns of Indonesian University of Hawaii Press Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, David and Uri Tadmor (1997) “Towards a Typology of Malay/Indonesian Dialects,” paper presented at the Association for Linguistic Typology, Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics, Penang, Malaysia, 14 January 1997.

  • Talmy Givon (1973) “Complex NP’s, Word Order and Resumptive Pronouns in Hebrew,” C. Corum (Eds) You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node: Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festiva l Chicago Linguistic Society Chicago 135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Eithne Guilfoyle Hung Henrietta Travis Lisa (1992) ArticleTitle“Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10 375–414 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00133368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Keenan Edward Comrie Bernard (1977) ArticleTitle“Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 8 63–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard K. Larson (1988) ArticleTitle“On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19 335–391

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ross Macdonald Dardjowidjojo soenjono (1967) Indonesian References grammer Georgetown University press Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joan Maling (1990) “Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic,” J. Maling A. Zaenen (Eds) Syntax and Semantics: Volume 24, Modern Icelandic Syntax Academic Press New York 71–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Simon (2001) Non-subject Arguments in Indonesian , PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.

  • Luigi Rizzi (1990) Relativized Minimality MIT Press Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogayah, A. Razak (1995) The Syntax and Semantics of Quantification in Malay: a Government and Binding Approach, PhD dissertation, Universiti Sains, Malaysia.

  • Ross, John R. (1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax , PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Saddy, Douglas (1991) “ Wh Scope Mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia,” in L. Cheng and H. Demirdash (eds.), More Papers on Wh-Movement , MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15, pp. 183–218.

  • Douglas Saddy (1992) “A versus A-bar Movement and wh -Fronting in Bahasa Indonesia,” University of Queensland ms

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, Ramli (1987) Fronted Constituents in Malay: Base Structures and Move-α in a Configurational Non-Indo-European Language , PhD dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Schindler, Patrick A. (1998) “The Accessibility Hierarchy Revisited: the Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns in Malay,” paper presented at the Second Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics, Ujung Pandang, Indonesia.

  • Sie, Ing Djang (1988) The Syntactic Passine in Bahasa Indonesia , PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • James Sneddon (1996) Indonesian: a Comprehensive Grammar Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooi Ling Soh (1996) “Certain Restrictions on A-bar Movement in Malay,” MIT ms

    Google Scholar 

  • Sten Vikner (1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Cole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, P., Hermon, G. Subject And Non-subject Relativization in Indonesian. J East Asian Linguis 14, 59–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-2703-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-2703-3

Keywords

Navigation