Skip to main content
Log in

A Service-Based Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an All-Day Group Parenting Program

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parent training programs such as the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program improve outcomes for both children and parents. However, many parents who need support still do not access parenting programs, with common barriers including time constraints and inconvenience. Group Triple P was designed to be delivered over 8 consecutive weeks, but in response to parent demands has been delivered in an adapted format (All-Day Group Triple P) at the Child and Family Psychology Clinic, the University of Queensland. All-Day Group Triple P consists of an 8-h all-day group followed by 4 weekly telephone calls, which is a more time-efficient and convenient delivery format for parents. This service-based evaluation examines the effectiveness of the Group Triple P when delivered as an all-day group followed by four telephone calls. Retrospective pre-post data from 2001 to 2011 collected during service delivery was analyzed. Participants were 159 mothers and 144 fathers. Significant improvements in child problems, parenting styles, parental adjustment, and parental disagreement were reported, with no improvement in parental relationship quality. Reliable and clinically significant improvements were demonstrated, and high levels of program satisfaction reported. This study highlights the potential benefits of providing more convenient and efficient services in order to reach more families in need.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, D. S., O’Leary, S. G., Wolff, L. S., & Acker, M. M. (1993). The parenting scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 137–144. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., Korotitsch, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 79–89. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dadds, M. R., & Powell, M. B. (1991). The relationship of interparental conflict and global marital adjustment to aggression, anxiety, and immaturity in aggressive and nonclinic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19(5), 553–567. doi:10.1007/BF00925820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, J. E., Nissley-Tsiopinis, J., & Moreland, A. D. (2006). From intent to enrolment, attendance, and participation in preventive parenting groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S. (1993). Consumer satisfaction measures for assessing parent training programs. In S. van de Creek, S. Knapp, T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations for clinical practice, vol. 12. A source book. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). ECBI Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory and SESBI-R Sutter-Eyberg Student Behaviour Inventory—Revised, Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, E., Brooks, A., & Van Der Zwan, R. (2012). Parenting program uptake: Impacts of implementation factors on intention to enrol. Advances in Mental Health, 10(2), 127–137. doi:10.5172/jamh.2011.10.2.127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoath, F. E., & Sanders, M. R. (2002). A feasibility study of enhanced Group Triple P–Positive Parenting Program for parents of children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Behaviour Change, 19(4), 191–206. doi:10.1375/bech.19.4.191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, J. L., Sanders, M. R., & Markie-Dadds, C. (2003). The impact of parent training on marital functioning: A comparison of two group versions of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for parents of children with early-onset conduct problems. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31, 127–142. doi:10.1017/S1352465803002017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, B. W., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2006). A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 86–104. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska, A., Adamson, M., Hinchliffe, K., & Adams, T. (2014). Hassle free mealtimes Triple P: A randomised controlled trial of a brief parenting group for childhood mealtime difficulties. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 53, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 45, 141–151. doi:10.2307/351302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyno & McGrath, (2006). Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problems- a meta-analytic. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 99–111. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01544.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E. A., Eyberg, S. M., & Ross, A. ,W. (1980). The standardisation of an inventory of child conduct problem behaviours. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9(1), 22–28. doi:10.1080/15374418009532938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romney, S., Israel, N., & Zlatevski, D. (2014). Exploration-stage implementation variation: Its effect on the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based parenting program. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 222(1), 37–48. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, K., Dittman, C. K., Sanders, M. R., Burson, R., & Hammington, J. (2014). Does adding an emotion component enhance the Triple P−Positive Parenting Program? Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 244–252. doi:10.1037/a0035997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R. (2012). Development, evaluation, and multinational dissemination of the Triple-P Positive Parenting Program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8(11), 11.1–11.35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The Triple P–Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Hockaday, C., & Shin, C. Y. (1996). Barriers to participation in family skills preventive interventions and their evaluations: A replication and extension. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 45(3), 247–254. doi:10.2307/585496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. K., & Biglan, A. (1998). Behavioural family interventions for improving child-rearing: A review of the literature for clinicians and policy makers. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(1), 41–59. doi:10.1023/A:1021848315541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, M., & Pekarik, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of psychotherapy dropout. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassandra L. Tellegen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program is owned by The University of Queensland (UQ). The University through its main technology transfer company, UniQuest Pty Ltd, has licensed Triple P International Pty Ltd to publish and disseminate the program worldwide. Royalties stemming from published Triple P resources are distributed to the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences at UQ, Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology at UQ, and contributory authors. No author has any share or ownership in Triple P International Pty Ltd. Cassandra Tellegen is an employee of UQ and a member of the Triple P Research Network. Elspeth Johnston has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tellegen, C.L., Johnston, E. A Service-Based Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an All-Day Group Parenting Program. J Child Fam Stud 26, 664–673 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0630-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0630-3

Keywords

Navigation