Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Increasing cooperation among plants, symbionts, and farmers is key to past and future progress in agriculture

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

Abstract

The collective welfare of crop plants, their microbial symbionts, farmers, and society can be undermined by tragedies of the commons. A crop could increase resource allocation to grain if each plant invested less in sending roots into soil already explored by neighbors and less in stem growth. But evolutionary fitness depends on which plants capture the most soil resources and light (e.g., by growing taller than their neighbors), not just on the efficiency with which those resources are used. As for symbionts, with several strains infecting each plant, only host-imposed sanctions limit the fitness of strains that divert more resources to their own reproduction, at the expense of activities that benefit their host plant. Similarly, individual farmers do not necessarily benefit from pest- and resource-management practices that benefit farmers collectively or society as a whole. Plant breeders have increased crop yields by reversing past selection for individual fitness and they could breed for crops that would favor more-cooperative microbial symbionts. Better aligning interests among farmers and society may be more difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amani, I., Fischer, R. A., & Reynolds, M. P. (1996). Canopy temperature depression association with yield of irrigated spring wheat cultivars in a hot climate. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 176, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus, J. F., Jones, R., & Wilson, J. H. (1972). A comparison of barley cultivars with different leaf inclinations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Resech, 23, 945–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, J. (1993). Future harvest: Pesticide-free farming. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethlenfalvay, G. J., Abu-Shakra, S. S., & Phillips, D. A. (1978). Interdependence of nitrogen nutrition and photosynthesis in Pisum sativum L. II. Host plant response to nitrogen fixation by Rhizobium strains. Plant Physiology, 62, 131–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christin, P., Salamin, N., Kellogg, E. A., Vicentini, A., & Besnard, G. (2009). Integrating phylogeny into studies of C4 variation in the grasses. Plant Physiology, 149, 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., & Farquhar, G. D. (2004). Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2447–2460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. S., Hill, J. D., Chase, C. A., Johanns, A. M., & Liebman, M. (2012). Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PLoS One, 7, e47149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. F. (2000). Legume sanctions and the evolution of symbiotic cooperation by rhizobia. American Naturalist, 156, 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. F. (2012). Darwinian agriculture: How understanding evolution can improve agriculture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. F., Bledsoe, C., Kahn, M. L., O’Gara, F., Simms, E. L., & Thomashow, L. S. (2003). Cooperation in the rhizosphere and the “free rider” problem. Ecology, 84, 838–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. F., Bryant, D. C., & Kearney, T. E. (2004). Crop yields over the first nine years of LTRAS, a long-term comparison of field crop systems in a Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Research, 86, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. F., Fedders, J. M., & Harter, B. L. (2010). Individual fitness versus whole-crop photosynthesis: Solar tracking tradeoffs in alfalfa. Evolutionary Applications, 3, 466–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. F., & Kiers, E. T. (2011). Life-histories of rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi. Current Biology, 21, R775–R785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C. M. (1968). The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica, 17, 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, W. G., Williams, W. A., & Loomis, R. S. (1967). Tassels and productivity of maize. Crop Science, 7, 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D. N., & Cassman, K. G. (1999). Post-green-revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Science, 39, 1622–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. A., Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Zaks, D. (2007). Our share of the planetary pie. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 12585–12586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A., & Grafen, A. (2009). Capturing the superorganism: A formal theory of group adaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubry-Rangin, C., Garcia, M., & Bena, G. (2010). Partner choice in Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium symbiosis. Proceedeings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 1947–1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, W. D., Burkness, E. C., Mitchell, P. D., Moon, R. D., Leslie, T. W., Fleischer, S. J., Abrahamson, M., Hamilton, K. L., Steffey, K. L., Gray, M. E., Hellmich, R. L., Kaster, L. V., Hunt, T. E, Wright, R. J., Pecinovsky, K., Rabaey, T. L., Flood, B. R., & Raun, E. S. (2010). Areawide suppression of European corn borer with Bt maize reaps savings to non-Bt maize growers. Science, 330, 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. R. (1964). Plant type as a rice breeding objective. Crop Science, 4, 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. R., & de Jesus, J. (1968). Studies on competition in rice. I. Competition in Mixtures of Varieties Evolution, 22, 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. C., Copeland, P. J., Crookston, R. K., & Pfleger, F. L. (1992). Mycorrhizae: Possible explanation for yield decline with continuous corn and soybean. Agronomy Journal, 84, 387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebeish, R., Niessen, M., Thiruveedhi, K., Bari, R., Hirsch, H. J., Rosenkranz, R., Stabler, N., Schonfeld, B., Kreuzaler, F., & Peterhansel, C. (2007). Chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthesis and biomass production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Biotechnology, 25, 593–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, E. T., & Denison, R. F. (2008). Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant-rhizosphere mutualisms. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, E. T., Duhamel, M., Yugandgar, Y., Mensah, J. A., Franken, O., Verbruggen, E., Fellbaum, C., Kowalchuk, G. A., Hart, M. M., Bago, A., Palmer, T. M., West, S. A., Vandenkoornhuyse,P., Jansa, J., & Bucking, H. (2011). Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science, 333, 880–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, E. T., Hutton, M. G., & Denison, R. F. (2007). Human selection and the relaxation of legume defences against ineffective rhizobia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 3119–3126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, E. T., Rousseau, R. A., & Denison, R. F. (2006). Measured sanctions: Legume hosts detect quantitative variation in rhizobium cooperation and punish accordingly. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 8, 1077–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, E. T., Rousseau, R. A., West, S. A., & Denison, R. F. (2003). Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature, 425, 78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinraide, T. B., & Denison, R. F. (2003). Strong inference, the way of science. American Biology Teacher, 65, 419–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Turner, N. C., Singh, D. P., Singh, P., & Barr, M. (1999). Diurnal and seasonal patterns of water potential, photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of clusterbean. Photosynthetica, 37, 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, D. W. (2013). Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: Physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, P. A., & Vitousek, P. M. (2006). Agricultural intensification: Will land spared from farming be land spared for nature? Conservation Biology, 20, 709–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, W. M. (1996). Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: Selection program and direct responses. Poultry Science, 75, 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. E., Repetti, P. P., Adams, T. R., Creelman, R. A., Wu, J., Warner, D. C., Anstrom, D. C., Bensen, R. J., Castiglioni, P. P., Donnarummo, M. G., Hinchey, B. S., Kumimoto, R. W., Maszle, D. R., Canales, R. D., Krolikowski, K. A., Dotson, S. B., Gutterson, N., Ratcliffe, O. J., & Heard, J. E. (2007). Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 16450–16455.

  • Oono, R., Anderson, C. G., & Denison, R. F. (2011). Failure to fix nitrogen by non-reproductive symbiotic rhizobia triggers host sanctions that reduce fitness of their reproductive clonemates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 278, 2698–2703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, M., Rienzo-Stack, K., & Power, A. G. (2011). A multi-scale, landscape approach to predicting insect populations in agro-ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 21, 1782–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, J. W., Smith, G. E., Winter, S. R., & Johnston, T. J. (1968). Field investigations of the relationships of leaf angle in corn (Zea mays L.) to grain yield and apparent photosynthesis. Agronomy Journal, 60, 422–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan, B., Onial, M., Balmford, A., & Green, R. E. (2011). Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: Land sharing and land sparing compared. Science, 333, 1289–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, W. C., Kadam, S. V., & Denison, R. F. (2008). Polyhydroxybutyrate supports survival and reproduction in starving rhizobia. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 65, 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rustagi, D., Engel, S., & Kosfeld, M. (2010). Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science, 330, 961–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, T. R., Purcell, L. C., & Sneller, C. H. (2004). Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends in Plant Science, 9, 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao, G. V., Sahrawat, K. L., Nakahara, K., Rao, I. M., Ishitani, M., Hash, C. T., Kishii, M., Bonnett, D. G., Berry, W. L. & Lata, J. C. (2013). A paradigm shift towards low-nitrifying production systems: The role of biological nitrification inhibition (BNI). Annals of Botany, 112, 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, W., Wilson, D. S., & Elias, R. (2000). Artificial ecosystem selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 9110–9114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B. E. (2008). Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 19029–19030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollan, B., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Cooperation and the commons. Science, 330, 923–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J., Andersen, S. B., Wille, W. K. M., Griepentrog, H. W., & Olsen, J. M. (2010). Evolutionary agroecology—the potential for cooperative, high-density, weed-suppressing cereals. Evolutionary Applications, 3, 473–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. A., Kiers, E. T., Simms, E. L., & Denison, R. F. (2002). Sanctions and mutualism stability: Why do rhizobia fix nitrogen? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 685–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalucki, M. P., Adamson, D., & Furlong, M. J. (2009). The future of IPM: Whither or wither? Australian Journal of Entomology, 28, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. Y., Sun, G. J., & Jiang, X. H. (1999). Donald’s ideotype and growth redundancy: A game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61, 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. G., Portis, A. R., & Long, S. P. (2004). Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell and Environment, 27, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., & Zhang, D. Y. (2013). Donald’s ideotype and growth redundancy: A pot experimental test using an old and a modern spring wheat cultivar. PLoS One, 8, e70006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecology Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, Saint Paul, MN , 55108, USA

    R. Ford Denison

Authors
  1. R. Ford Denison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ford Denison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denison, R.F. Increasing cooperation among plants, symbionts, and farmers is key to past and future progress in agriculture. J Bioecon 16, 223–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-014-9179-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-014-9179-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation