Skip to main content
Log in

Prologue: Archaeology, Animism and Non-Human Agents

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ahern, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird-Davis, N. (1999). “Animism” revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Current Anthropology, 40(S1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marrais, E., Gosden, C., & Renfrew, C. (Eds.) (2004). Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge University.

  • Dobres, M. A., & Robb, J. E. (2000). Agency in archaeology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. NewYork: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. (2005). What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12(3), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves-Brown, P. (Ed.) (2000). Matter, materiality and modern culture. London: Routledge.

  • Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethos, 71(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. A. (2000). Heirlooms and houses: Materiality and social memory. In R. A. Joyce, & S. D. Gillespie (Eds.), Beyond kinship: Social and material reproduction in house societies (pp. 189–212). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2003). Memory’s materiality: Ancestral presence, commemorative practice and disjunctive locales. In R. M. Van Dyke, & S. E. Alcock (Eds.), Archaeologies of memory (pp. 34–55). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2004). Object worlds in ancient Egypt: Material biographies past and present. London: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (Ed.) (2005). Archaeologies of materiality. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Miller, D. (2005). Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. J., & Walker, W. H. (Eds.) (2008). Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices. Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1999). The material life of human beings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. B. (1958 [1871]). Primitive culture. New York: Harper and Row.

  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004). The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W. H. (2008). Practice and non-human social actors: The afterlife of witches and dogs in the American Southwest. In B. J. Mills, & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices (pp. 137–157). Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda A. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, L.A., Walker, W.H. Prologue: Archaeology, Animism and Non-Human Agents. J Archaeol Method Theory 15, 297–299 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-008-9056-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-008-9056-6

Keywords

Navigation