Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear DNA fragmentation negatively affects zona binding competence of Y bearing mouse spermatozoa

  • Gamete Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the influence of sperm DNA integrity on the zona binding ability of mouse spermatozoa in relation to their sex chromosomal constitution.

Method(s)

In this prospective experimental study, the sperm DNA fragmentation was induced by exposing testicular area of Swiss Albino mice (Mus musculus) to different doses of γ-radiation (0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 Gy). Sperm DNA fragmentation was quantified by single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). In vitro sperm zona binding assay was performed and the numbers of zona bound X and Y bearing spermatozoa were determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Result(s)

The assessment of zona pellucida bound X and Y-bearing spermatozoa using fluorescence in situ hybridization has revealed a unique binding pattern. The number of zona bound Y-spermatozoa declined significantly (P < 0.01 to 0.0001) with increase in the DNA damage. The skewed binding pattern of X and Y-bearing sperm was strongly correlated with the extent of sperm DNA damage.

Conclusion(s)

The zona pellucida may have a role in preventing DNA damaged mouse sperm binding especially towards Y-bearing sperm. However, the exact mechanism behind this observation needs to be elucidated further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donnelly ET, O’Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SE. Differences in nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial integrity of semen and prepared human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1552–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. RBM Online. 2007;14:727–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Developmental capacity of damaged spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2279–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fatehi AN, Bevers MM, Schoevers E, Roelen BA, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J Androl. 2006;27:176–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adiga SK, Upadhya D, Kalthur G, Bola Sadashiva SR, Kumar P. Transgenerational changes in somatic and germ line genetic integrity of first-generation offspring derived from the DNA damaged sperm. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2486–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Dyk Q, Lanzendorf S, Kolm P, Hodgen GD, Mahony MC. Incidence of aneuploid spermatozoa from subfertile men: selected with motility versus hemizona-bound. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Estop A, Catala V, Santalo J. Chromosome constitution of highly motile mouse sperm. Mol Reprod Dev. 1990;27:168–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hourcade JD, Pérez-Crespo M, Fernández-González R, Pintado B, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Selection against spermatozoa with fragmented DNA after postovulatory mating depends on the type of damage. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarrate Z, Anton E. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol in human sperm. J Vis Exp. 2009;31:1405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:3–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adiga SK, Toyoshima M, Shiraishi K, Shimura T, Takeda J, Taga M, et al. p21 provides stage specific DNA damage control to preimplantation embryos. Oncogene. 2007;26:6141–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shimura T, Toyoshima M, Taga M, Shiraishi K, Uematsu N, Inoue M, et al. The novel surveillance mechanism of the Trp53-dependent s-phase checkpoint ensures chromosome damage repair and preimplantation-stage development of mouse embryos fertilized with x-irradiated sperm. Radiat Res. 2002;158:735–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimura T, Inoue M, Taga M, Shiraishi K, Uematsu N, Takei N, et al. Niwa O p53-dependent S-phase damage checkpoint and pronuclear cross talk in mouse zygotes with X-irradiated sperm. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:2220–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martínez-Pasarell O, Vidal F, Colls P, Nogués C, Egozcue J, Templado C. Sex chromosome aneuploidy in sperm-derived pronuclei, motile sperm and unselected sperm, scored by three-color FISH. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1997;78:27–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Dyk Q, Mahony MC, Hodgen GD. Differential binding of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing human spermatozoa to zona pellucida in vitro. Andrologia. 2001;33:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aitken RJ, Krausz C. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction. 2001;122:497–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mühlmann-Díaz MC, Bedford JS. Breakage of human chromosomes 4, 19 and Y in G0 cells immediately after exposure to gamma-rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;65:165–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar D, Upadhya D, Salian SR, Rao SB, Kalthur G, Kumar P, et al. The extent of paternal sperm DNA damage influences early post-natal survival of first generation mouse offspring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Niwa O. Induced genomic instability in irradiated germ cells and in the offspring; reconciling discrepancies among the human and animal studies. Oncogene. 2003;22:7078–86. Review.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan WF. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiat Res. 2003;159:581–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was supported by Indian Council of Medical Research in the form of senior research fellowship to DU (IRISID No. 2006–01640). Authors are thankful to Radiation Oncology department for providing radiation facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish Kumar Adiga.

Additional information

Capsule

Differences in zona pellucida binding of mouse X and Y bearing spermatozoa are related to their DNA integrity.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of zona pellucida bound X-bearing (green) and Y-bearing (red) spermatozoa. (JPEG 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, D., Upadhya, D., Uppangala, S. et al. Nuclear DNA fragmentation negatively affects zona binding competence of Y bearing mouse spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, 1611–1615 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0123-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0123-x

Keywords

Navigation