Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distribution of the anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism in healthy eyes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the magnitude and axis orientation of the anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism in normal healthy eyes of an Iranian population.

Methods

In a prospective cross-sectional study, ophthalmic and anterior segment parameters of 153 healthy eyes of 153 subjects were evaluated by Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer. The magnitude and axis orientation [with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique] of the anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism measurements (ACA, PCA, and TCA) were compared according to the age, sex, and other ophthalmic parameters.

Results

The mean ± SD age of the study population was 30 ± 5.9 years. The mean magnitude was 1.09 ± 0.76 diopters (D) for ACA, 0.30 ± 0.13 D for PCA, and 1.08 ± 0.77 D for TCA. Males had a significantly higher magnitude of PCA than females (p = 0.041). Most eyes had a WTR anterior astigmatism and an ATR posterior astigmatism. The WTR astigmatism had a higher mean magnitude compared to the ATR and oblique astigmatism in all the astigmatism groups, with a significant difference in the ACA and TCA groups (p < 0.05). PCA magnitude exceeded 0.50 D in only 7.8% of the subjects. ACA, PCA, and TCA were significantly correlated with each other and also had a significant correlation with the anterior and posterior maximum corneal elevation measurements (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The results of this study although are limited due to the small number of participants and confined to our demographics, provided information regarding a population that was not described before and may be helpful in obtaining optimum results in astigmatism correction in refractive surgery or designing new intraocular lenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen T (1986) On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 70:152–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai RJ, Tsai CY (2010) Effects of aging on anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism. Cornea 29:632–637. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c2965f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L (2012) Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:2080–2087. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohammadi M, Naderan M, Pahlevani R, Jahanrad A (2016) Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. doi:10.1007/s10792-016-0201-z

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho JD, Tsai CY, Liou SW (2009) Accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 147:788–795. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M (2007) Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18:325–333. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3281ca7121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Sy ME, Mai H, Yu F, Hamilton DR (2015) Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism on refractive outcomes after toric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:84–89. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Savini G, Versaci F, Vestri G, Ducoli P, Naeser K (2014) Influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on total corneal astigmatism in eyes with moderate to high astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:1645–1653. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naderan M, Rajabi MT, Zarrinbakhsh P (2016) Distribution of the anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism in eyes with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 167:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch DD, Jenkins RB, Weikert MP, Yeu E, Wang L (2013) Correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses: effect of posterior corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1803–1809. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueno Y, Hiraoka T, Miyazaki M, Ito M, Oshika T (2015) Corneal thickness profile and posterior corneal astigmatism in normal corneas. Ophthalmology 122:1072–1078. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyake T, Shimizu K, Kamiya K (2015) Distribution of posterior corneal astigmatism according to axis orientation of anterior corneal astigmatism. PLoS ONE 10:e0117194. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nemeth G, Berta A, Lipecz A, Hassan Z, Szalai E, Modis L Jr (2014) Evaluation of posterior astigmatism measured with Scheimpflug imaging. Cornea 33:1214–1218. doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000000238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tonn B, Klaproth OK, Kohnen T (2014) Anterior surface-based keratometry compared with Scheimpflug tomography-based total corneal astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:291–298. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eom Y, Kang SY, Kim HM, Song JS (2014) The effect of posterior corneal flat meridian and astigmatism amount on the total corneal astigmatism estimated from anterior corneal measurements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:1769–1777. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2737-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez de la Fuente C, Sanchez-Cano A, Segura F, Fuentes-Broto L, Pinilla I (2014) Repeatability of ocular measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy eyes. Biomed Res Int 2014:808646. doi:10.1155/2014/808646

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guler E, Yagci R, Akyol M, Arslanyilmaz Z, Balci M, Hepsen IF (2014) Repeatability and reproducibility of Galilei measurements in normal keratoconic and postrefractive corneas. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 37:331–336. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2014.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall LA, Hunt C, Young G, Wolffsohn J (2013) Factors affecting corneoscleral topography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3691–3701. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-11657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Strobbe E, Cellini M, Barbaresi U, Campos EC (2014) Influence of age and gender on corneal biomechanical properties in a healthy Italian population. Cornea 33:968–972. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim BJ, Ryu IH, Lee JH, Kim SW (2016) Correlation of sex and myopia with corneal epithelial and stromal thicknesses. Cornea 35:1078–1083. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khezri F, Mirzajani A, Karimian F, Jafarzadehpur E (2015) Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? J Ophthalmic Vis Res 10:102–105. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.163772

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received. This article has not been presented at a meeting or published or submitted for publication elsewhere. The authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Naderan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There were no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feizi, S., Naderan, M., Ownagh, V. et al. Distribution of the anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism in healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol 38, 481–491 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0483-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0483-9

Keywords

Navigation