Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overcorrecting minus lens therapy in patients with intermittent exotropia: Should it be the first therapeutic choice?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate medium-term outcomes of overminus lens treatment in patients with intermittent exotropia [X(T)]. A retrospective analysis was performed of the outcomes of 19 children with X(T) who were prescribed overminus lens (−2.00 to −4.00 D) for a median period of 18 months (6–33). The success was evaluated using two assessment methods: 1. Newcastle Control System (NCS), and 2. Jampolsky’s assessment. The mean age of the patients was 6.8 ± 3.3 years (range 3–14 years). After the therapy, the median NCS score significantly improved from 5 to 1 (p < 0.001). Sixteen children (84 %) showed a NCS score of 2 or less after overminus lens treatment. According to Jampolsky’s assessment, 84 % of the patients showed marked improvement from the baseline (47 % had qualitative improvement, 37 % quantitative decrease in the angle of deviation in addition to a qualitative improvement). The median pre-treatment distant angle decreased from 25 prism diopters (PD) to 18 PD after the treatment (p = 0.002). Overcorrecting minus lens treatment has a reasonable rate of success in the medium term and may be advised as primary therapeutic alternative for X(T). Both NCS and Jampolsky’s scoring system appear to be useful and comparable for follow-up of patients with X(T).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hiles DA, Davies GT, Costenbader FD (1968) Long-term observations on unoperated intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 80:436–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pratt-Johnson JA, Barlow JM, Tillson G (1977) Early surgery in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 84:689–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Richard JM, Parks MM (1983) Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in different age groups. Ophthalmology 90:1172–1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. von Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility, 6th edn. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 6. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, San Francisco, CA, USA: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2010: 102

  6. Hoyt CS, Taylor D (2013) Pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus, vol 2, revised. Saunders-Elsevier, Philadelphia

  7. Wright KW (2012) Pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. Oxford University Press, New York, p 309

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caltrider N, Jampolsky A (1983) Overcorrecting minus lens therapy for treatment of intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 90:1160–1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Watts P, Tippings E, Al-Madfai H (2005) Intermittent exotropia, overcorrecting minus lenses, and the Newcastle scoring system. J AAPOS. 9:460–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowe FJ, Noonan CP, Freeman G, DeBell J (2009) Intervention for intermittent distance exotropia with overcorrecting minus lenses. Eye. 23:320–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koklanis K, Georgievski Z, Zhang K (2010) The use of distance stereoacuity assessment in determining the effectiveness of overminus lenses in intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 14:488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kushner BJ (1999) Does overcorrecting minus lens therapy for intermittent exotropia cause myopia? Arch Ophthalmol 117:638–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paula JS, Ibrahim FM, Martins MC, Bicas HEA, Velasco-Cruz AA (2009) Refractive error changes in children with intermittent exotropia under overminus lens therapy. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 72:751–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rutstein RP, Marsh-Tootle W, London R (1989) Changes in refractive error for exotropes treated with overminus lenses. Optom Vis Sci 66:487–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haggerty H, Richardson S, Hrisos S, Strong NP, Clarke MP (2004) The Newcastle control score: a new method grading the severity of intermittent distance exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 88:233–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Buck D, Hatt SR, Haggerty H, Hrisos S, Strong NP, Steen NI, Clarke MP (2007) The use of Newcastle control score in the management of intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 91:215–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nusz KJ, Mohney BG, Diehl NN (2006) The course of intermittent exotropia in a population-based cohort. Ophthalmology 113:1154–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romanchuk KG, Dotchin SA, Zurevinsky J (2006) The natural history of surgically untreated intermittent exotropia-looking into the distant future. J AAPOS 10:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chia A, Seenyen L, Long QB (2005) A retrospective review of 287 consecutive children in Singapore presenting with intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 9:257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee BJ, Kim SJ, Yu YS (2015) The clinical course of intermittent exotropia with small initial deviation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 52:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hepsen IF, Evereklioglu C, Bayramlar H (2001) The effect of reading and near-work on the development of myopia in emmetropic boys: a prospective, controlled, three-year follow-up study. Vision Res 41:2511–2520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bayramlar H, Cekiç O, Hepşen IF (1999) Does convergence, not accommodation, cause axial-length elongation at near? A biometric study in teens. Ophthalmic Res 31:304–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bayramlar H, Karadag R, Uslu H, Cakici O (2015) Which one is more causative for myopia progression: accommodation or convergence? Med Hypotheses 85:112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bayramlar H (2002) Myopia. Convergence might cause myopia. BMJ 325(7371):1035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Schaeffel F, Howland HC (1991) Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken. Vis Res 31:717–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schaeffel F, Troilo D, Wallman J, Howland HC (1990) Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus. Vis Neurosci 4:177–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schaeffel F, Simon P, Feldkaemper M, Ohngemach S, Williams RW (2003) Molecular biology of myopia. Clin Exp Optom 86:295–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parssinen O, Lyyra AL (1993) Myopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: a three-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2794–2802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huseyin Bayramlar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayramlar, H., Gurturk, A.Y., Sari, U. et al. Overcorrecting minus lens therapy in patients with intermittent exotropia: Should it be the first therapeutic choice?. Int Ophthalmol 37, 385–390 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0273-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0273-9

Keywords

Navigation