Abstract
Some remarks on the possible methods of composing saṃhitās as hinted in chosen texts belonging to the Pāñcarātra school are presented in “Sect. 1”. In “Sect. 2,” the content and the structure of the Sātvatasaṃhitā and Īśvarasaṃhitā are compared. In fact, both texts are independent works even though in the light of some Pāñcarātrika texts they are considered to be mutually linked, the latter being considered a “commentary” of the former. In “Sect. 3,” the initiation (dīkṣā) as found in both texts is outlined. In “Sect. 4”, I focus on the re-use of the portions concerning dīkṣā: although the redactor of the Īśvarasaṃhitā borrowed almost all the Sātvatasaṃhitā’s chapters on initiation, he dealt in a very different way with the practice called vaibhavīyanarasiṃhakalpa that in the context of the latter text plays the role of a unique preliminary purification. Strikingly, the Sātvatasaṃhitā’s redactor re-used the initial verses describing the vaibhavīyanarasiṃhakalpa, putting them into other contexts, not necessarily connected to the issue of initiation, whereas he totally omitted its impressive section concerning magical powers (siddhi).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Original Sources
Āgamaprāmāṇya = Āgamaprāmāṇya of Yāmunācārya. Ed. by M. Narasimhachary, (Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, 160), Baroda 1976.
AhS = Ahirbudhnyasaṃhitā. Ahirbudhnya-Saṃhitā of the Pāñcarātrāgama. Ed. by M.D. Ramanujacharya under the Supervision of F. Otto Schrader. Revised by V. Krishnamacharya, 2 vols., (The Adyar Library Series, 4), Adyar 1986.
ĪS = Īśvarasaṃhitā. Īśvarasaṃhitā Anantācāryais saṃśodhitā, (Śāstramuktāvalī, 45), Kāñcī 1923.
JayS = Jayākhyasaṃhitā. Jayākyasaṃhita. Crit. Ed. with an Introduction in Sanskrit, Indices, etc. by Embar Krishnamacharya, (Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, 54), Baroda 1934.
Mṛgendrāgama (Kriyāpāda et Caryāpāda), avec le commentaire de Bhaṭṭa-Nārāyaṇakaṇṭha. Ed. by N. R. Bhatt, (Publications de l’Institut Français d’Indologie, 23), Pondicherry 1962.
PādS = Pādmasaṃhitā. Padma Samhita. (Part I). Crit. ed. by Seetha Padmanabhan and R. N. Sampath. (Part II). Crit. Ed. by Seetha Padmanabhan and V. Varadachari, (Pancaratra Parisodhana Parisad Series, 3–4), Madras 1974, 1982.
SātS = SŚātvatasaṃhitā. SŚātvata-saṃhitā. With Commentary by Alaśiṅga Bhaṭṭa. Ed. by Vrajavallabha Dvivedī, (Library Rare Text Publication Series, 6), Varanasi 2001.
ŚrīprśnS = Śrīpraśnasaṃhitā. Śrīpraśnasaṃhitā. Ed. by S. Padmanabhan, (Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha Series, 12), Tirupati 2006.
Secondary Sources
Brunner, H. (1975). Le sādhaka, personnage oublié du śivaïsme du Sud. Journal Asiatique, 263, 411–443.
Carman, J. B. (2006). Illuminating the relation between Pāñcarātra and the early Śrīvaiṣṇava community. In G. Oberhammer & M. Rastelli (Eds.), Studies in Hinduism IV. On the mutual influences and relationship of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta and Pāñcarātra (pp. 55–73). Wien: Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Czerniak-Drożdżowicz, M. (2003). Pāñcarātra scripture in the process of change. A study of Paramasaṃhitā. Vienna: The De Nobili Research Library.
Czerniak-Drożdżowicz, M. (2006–2007). How to structure God’s revelation—Some remarks about constructing tantric texts. Folia Orientalia, 42/43, 1–12.
Dębicka-Borek, E. (2013). Ritual Worship of the Narasiṃhamantra as Depicted in the Sātvatasaṃhitā. Cracow Indological Studies, XV, 167–207.
Dvivedī 2001 = Sātvatasaṃhitā.
Gengnagel, J. (2010). Conversion or initiation. On the removal of the sectarian marks (liṅgoddhāra) in Śaiva Siddhānta. In A. Zotter & C. Zotter (Eds.), Hindu and Buddhist initiations in India and Nepal (pp. 299–318). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Gonda, J. (1977). Medieval religious literature in Sanskrit. In A history of Indian literature (Vol. 2/1). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Goudriaan, T. (1981). Hindu tantric literature in Sanskrit. In T. Goudriaan & S. Gupta (Eds.), Hindu tantric and Śākta literature (pp. 1–172). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Gupta, S. (1983). The changing pattern of Pāñcarātra initiation. A case study in the reinterpretation of ritual. In R. Kloppenborg (Ed.), Selected studies on ritual in the Indian religions. Essays to D.J. Hoens (pp. 69–91). Leiden: Brill.
Hikita, H. (1990). Sāttvata Saṃhitā: An annotated translation. Chapter 17 (1). Soto-shū kenkyū kiyo, 21, 190–137.
Hikita, H. (1991). Sāttvata Saṃhitā: An annotated translation, Chapter 1 and 2. In Bukkyo bunkagaku ronshū Maeda Egaku hakase shoju kinen (pp. 578–546). Tokyo.
Hikita, H. (1993). Sāttvata Saṃhitā: An annotated translation, Chapter 18. Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters Aichi Gakuin University, 22, 1–26.
Hudson, D. D. (2002). Early evidence of the Pāñcarātra āgama. In K. A. Harper & R. L. Brown (Eds.), The roots of tantra (pp. 133–167). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hudson, D. D. (2006). The vyūhas in stone. In G. Oberhammer & M. Rastelli (Eds.), Studies in Hinduism IV. On the mutual influences and relationship of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta and Pāñcarātra (pp. 125–178). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Matsubara, M. (1994). Pāñcarātra Saṃhitās & early Vaiṣṇava theology. With a translation and critical notes from chapters on theology in Ahirbudhnya Saṃhitā. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Narasimhachary 1976 = Āgamaprāmāṇya.
Padmanabhan 2006 = ŚrīprśnS.
Rajan, K. V. S. (1967). Kaustubha Prāsāda—New light on Jayākhya tantra. Journal of the Oriental Institute of Baroda, 17, 71–85.
Raman, S. (2005). Samāśrayaṇa in Śrīvaiṣṇavism. In J. Gengnagel, U. Hüsken & S. Raman (Eds.), Words and deeds. Hindu and Buddhists rituals in South Asia. Ethno-Indology. Heidelberg Studies in South Asian Rituals (Vol. 1, pp. 91–114). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Raman, S. (2006). Initiation and conversion in Medieval South India: pañcasaṃskāra as historical practice in the Śrīvaiṣṇava Post-Rāmānuja hagiographical literature. In G. Oberhammer & M. Rastelli (Eds.), Studies in Hinduism IV. On the mutual influences and relationship of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta and Pāñcarātra (pp. 263–286). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Rastelli, M. (1999). Zum Verständnis des Pāñcarātra von der Herkunft seiner Saṃhitās. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 43, 51–93.
Rastelli, M. (2003). http://ikga.oeaw.ac.at/Mat/rastelli_ekayanaveda.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2014.
Rastelli, M. (2006). Die Tradition des Pāñcarātra im Spiegel der Pārameśvarasaṃhitā. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Rastelli, M. (2007). The ‘Pāñcarātra Passages’ in Agnipurāṇa 21–70. In D. Goodall & A. Padoux (Eds.), Mélanges tantriques à la mémoire d’Hélène Brunner. Tantric studies in memory of Hélène Brunner (pp. 87–229). Pondicherry: Institut Français de Pondichéry.
Sanderson, A. (2001). History through textual criticism in the study of Śaivism, the Pāñcarātra and the Buddhist Yoginītantras. In F. Grimal (Ed.), Les sources et le temps. Sources and time. A colloquium, Pondicherry, 11–13 January 1997. Pondicherry: École Française d’Extrême-Orient (pp. 1–47).
Schrader, F. O. (1995). Introduction to the Pāñcarātra and the Ahirbudhnya Saṃhitā. Madras: The Adyar Library and Research Centre.
Smith, H. D. (1975–1980). A descriptive bibliography of the printed texts of the Pāñcarātrāgama (2 vols.). Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, 158 and 168. Baroda: Oriental Institute.
TĀK = Goodall, D. & Rastelli, M. (Eds.) (2013). Tāntrikābhidhānakośa, III. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Young, K. K. (2006). Brāhmaṇas, Pāñcarātrins, and the formation of Śrīvaiṣṇavism. In G. Oberhammer & M. Rastelli (Eds.), Studies in Hinduism IV. On the mutual influences and relationship of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta and Pāñcarātra (pp. 179–261). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access
About this article
Cite this article
Dębicka-Borek, E. To Borrow or not to Borrow? Some Remarks on vaibhavīyanarasiṃhakalpa of Sātvatasaṃhitā . J Indian Philos 43, 581–600 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9248-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9248-1