Skip to main content
Log in

De/limiting Emptiness and the Boundaries of the Ineffable

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emptiness (śūnyatā) is one of the most important topics in Buddhist thought and also is one of the most perplexing. Buddhists in Tibet have developed a sophisticated tradition of philosophical discourse on emptiness and ineffability. This paper discusses the meaning(s) of emptiness within three prominent traditions in Tibet: the Geluk (dge lugs), Jonang (jo nang), and Nyingma (rnying ma). I give a concise presentation of each tradition’s interpretation of emptiness and show how each interpretation represents a distinctive aspect of its meaning. Given that Buddhist traditions (1) accept an extra-linguistic reality and (2) maintain a strong tradition of suspicion of language with the belief that language both constructs and distorts reality, this paper responds to an issue that is not so much whether or not an inexpressible reality can be expressed, but rather how it is best articulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cabezón, J., & Dargyay, G. L. (2007). Freedom from extremes: Gorampa’s “Distinguishing the views” and the Polemics of emptiness. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candrakīrti. (1999). Madhyamakāvatārabhāṣya (dbu ma la ’jug pa’i rang ’grel). Sarnath: Sakya Students’ Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctor, T. (trans.) (2004). Speech of delight: Mipham’s commentary on Śāntarakṣita’s Ornament of the Middle Way. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.

  • Dölpopa. (dol po pa shes rab rgyal mtshan, 1292–1361) (1976). The mountain doctrine: Ocean of definitive meaning (ri chos nges don rgya mtsho). Gangtok: Dodrup Sangyey Lama.

  • Matilal B. K. (1985) Logic, language, and reality. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B. K. (1992). Is Prasaṇga a Form of deconstruction? Journal of Indian Philosophy 20, 345–362; also published in Mind, Language and World, pp. 251–271. London: Oxford, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mipam (’ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912) (1987a) Collected Works (Dilgo Khyentsé’s expanded redaction of sde dge edition). Kathmandu, Zhechen Monastery

  • Mipam. (1987b). Lion’s Roar: Affirming Other-Emptiness (gzhan stong khas len seng ge’i nga ro). Mipam’s Collected Works, Vol. 12 (ga), pp. 359–378.

  • Mipam. (1990). Words That Delight Guru Mañjughoṣa: Commentary on the Madhyamakālaṃkāra (dbu ma rgyan gyi rnam bshad ’jam byangs bla ma dgyes pa’i zhal lung). Published in dbu ma rgyan rtsa ’grel. Sichuan: Nationalities Press.

  • Mipam. (1993). Commentary on the Wisdom Chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra (spyod ’jug sher ’grel ke ta ka). Sichuan: Nationalities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mipam. (1997). Beacon of Certainty (nges shes sgron me). Published in nges shes sgron me rtsa ’grel, pp. 1–54. Sichuan: Nationalities Press.

  • Mipam. Garland of light rays: Commentary on the Madhyāntavibhāga (dbu dang mtha’ rnam par ’byed pa’i bstan bcos kyi ’grel pa ’od zer phreng ba). Mipam’s Collected Works, Vol. 4 (pa), pp. 659–786.

  • Sthiramati. Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkā (dbus dang mtha’ rnam par ’byed pa’i’grel bshad). D. 4032, Vol. 77 (sde dge bstan ’gyur).

  • Tsongkhapa (tsong kha pa blo bzang grags pa, 1357–1419). (1979). The lesser exposition of the stages of the path (lam rim chung ba). In Collected Works, Vol. 21, pp. 1–438. New Delhi: Ngawang Gelek Demo.

  • Tsongkhapa. (1998). Thoroughly illuminating the viewpoint (dgongs pa rab gsal). Sarnath: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasubandhu. Madhyāntavibhāgabhāṣya (dbus dang mtha’ rnam par ’byed pa’i’grel pa). D. 4027, Vol. 77 (sde dge bstan ’gyur).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas S. Duckworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duckworth, D.S. De/limiting Emptiness and the Boundaries of the Ineffable. J Indian Philos 38, 97–105 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-009-9080-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-009-9080-1

Keywords

Navigation