Skip to main content
Log in

Personality traits’ effects on self-efficacy and outcome expectations for high school major choice

  • Published:
International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study focuses on the contribution of the Big Five personality traits to the development of self-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding selection of a high school major among 368 Israeli adolescents (M age = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Structural equation analyses showed that higher levels of conscientiousness and extraversion and lower neuroticism contributed to higher self-efficacy. In contrast, higher levels of conscientiousness and neuroticism and lower extraversion contributed to higher outcome expectations. These findings expand our understanding regarding personality characteristics serving as antecedents of self-efficacy and outcome expectations and sets important implications for career interventions with adolescents.

Résumé

Les effets des traits de personnalité sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et les attentes de résultat concernant le choix de l’option principale au lycée. Cette étude se focalise sur la contribution des traits de personnalité du Big Five au développement du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et des attentes de résultat concernant la sélection de l’option principale au lycée auprès de 368 adolescents israéliens (M âge = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Des analyses d’équations structurelles ont montré que des niveaux plus élevés de caractère consciencieux et d’extraversion, et des niveaux plus faibles de névrosisme, contribuaient à un sentiment d’efficacité personnelle plus élevé. Par contre, des niveaux plus élevés de caractère consciencieux et de névrosisme, et des niveaux plus faibles d’extraversion, contribuaient à des attentes de résultat plus élevées. Ces résultats élargissent notre compréhension de la manière dont les caractéristiques de la personnalité agissent en tant qu’antécédents sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et les attentes de résultats. Ils ont également des implications importantes concernant les interventions de carrière auprès des adolescents.

Zusammenfassung

Die Effekte von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften auf Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebnis-Erwartungen für die Wahl von High School Fächern. Die vorliegende Studie beschäftigt sich mit dem Beitrag der Big Five Persönlichkeitseigenschaften für die Entwicklung von Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebnis-Erwartungen bezüglich der Wahl von High School Fächern bei 368 israelischen Jugendlichen (M alter = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Strukturgleichungsanalysen konnten zeigen, dass höhere Level von Gewissenhaftigkeit und Extraversion, sowie geringerer Neurotizismus einen Beitrag zu höherer Selbstwirksamkeit leisten. Dagegen führten höhere Level von Gewissenhaftigkeit und Neurotizismus, sowie geringere Extraversion zu einer niedrigeren Ergebnis-Erwartung. Diese Ergebnisse erweitern unser Verständnis von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften als Antezedenzien für Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebnis-Erwartungen und lassen wichtige Implikationen für Karriereinterventionen bei Jugendlichen ableiten.

Resumen

Efectos de los rasgos de personalidad sobre la autoeficacia y las expectativas de resultado para la elección de especialidad en la Escuela Secundaria. El estudio actual se centra en la contribución de los de los Cinco Grandes rasgos de personalidad con el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y expectativas de resultados con respecto a la selección de una escuela importante de secundaria entre 368 adolescentes israelíes (M age = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Los análisis de ecuaciones estructurales mostró que los niveles más altos de conciencia y la extraversión y neuroticismo menor contribuyeron a una mayor auto-eficacia. Por el contrario, los niveles más altos de conciencia y neuroticismo y extraversión baja contribuyeron a las expectativas de resultados superiores. Estos hallazgos amplían nuestra comprensión respecto a las características de personalidad que actúa como antecedentes de las expectativas de autoeficacia y de resultados y establece importantes implicaciones para las intervenciones de la carrera con los adolescentes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development.

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), Applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. (2006). Basic issues and concepts in the career development and counseling of women. In W. B. Walsh & M. J. Heppner (Eds.), Handbook of career counseling for women (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N., & Voyten, K. K. (1997). Efficacy and outcome expectations influence career exploration and decidedness. Career Development Quarterly, 46, 179–189. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb01004.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Cinamon, R. G. (in press). Choosing a high school major: An important stage in the career development of Israeli adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment. doi:10.1177/1069072714553083.

  • Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock-Yowell, E., Andrews, L., & Buzzetta, M. E. (2011). Explaining career decision-making self-efficacy: Personality, cognitions, and cultural mistrust. Career Development Quarterly, 59, 400–411. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00967.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinamon, R. G. (2010). Decision making process regarding a high school: The contribution of social support, SES and gender factors. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343–359. doi:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzion, D., & Lasky, S. (1998). Personality Traits Questionnaire (Big Five) (Unpublished manuscript). Faculty of Management, Institute of Business Research, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

  • Feldt, R. C., Ferry, A., Bullock, M., Camarottu-Carvalho, A., Collingwood, M., Eilers, S., … Nurre, E. (2011). Personality, career indecision, and college adjustment in the first semester. Individual Differences Research, 9(2), 107–114.

  • Feldt, R. C., & Woelfel, C. (2009). Five-factor personality domains, self efficacy, career-outcome expectations, and career indecision. College Student Journal, 43(2), 429–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fort, I., Pacaud, C., & Gilles, P. Y. (2015). Job search intention, theory of planned behavior, personality and job search experience. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 15, 57–74. doi:10.1007/s10775-014-9281-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N. A., Cotter, E. W., & Kantamneni, N. (2009). The effectiveness of a career decision-making course. Journal of Career Assessment, 17, 338–347. doi:10.1177/1069072708330678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gati, I., & Saka, N. (2001). High school students’ career-related decision-making difficulties. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 331–340. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01978.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. O., & Betz, N. E. (2007). The five-factor model and career self-efficacy: General and domain-specific relationships. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 145–161. doi:10.1177/1069072706298011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, P. J. (2010). Barrier or benefit? Emotion in life-career design. Symposium presented at the 118th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Diego, CA. doi:10.1037/e602812010-001.

  • Hirschi, A. (2010). Vocational interests and career goals: Development and relations to personality in middle adolescence. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 223–238. doi:10.1177/1069072710364789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A., & Herrmann, A. (2013). Assessing difficulties in career decision-making among Swiss adolescents with the German My Vocational Situation Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 33–42. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. I. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory—versions 5a and 54 [Technical Report]. Berkeley: University Institute of Personality and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. M., Wei, M., Wu, T. F., Borgen, F. H., & Bailey, D. C. (2007). Discriminating among educational majors and career aspirations in Taiwanese undergraduates: The contribution of personality and self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 395–408. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.4.395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 236–247. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and subjective well-being in the context of work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 6–21. doi:10.1177/1069072707305769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 328–335. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Hutchens, T., & Loveland, J. M. (2005). An investigation of Big Five personality traits and career decidedness among early and middle adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 25–39. doi:10.1177/1069072704270272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. E., & Williams-Diehm, K. (2013). Student engagement and leadership of the transition planning process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 43–50. doi:10.1177/2165143413476545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456–1468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, E. H, Jr, & Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0020539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda, L., Piña-Watson, B., Castillo, L. G., Castillo, R., Khan, N., & Leigh, J. (2012). Acculturation, enculturation, ethnic identity, and conscientiousness as predictors of Latino boys’ and girls’ career decision self-efficacy. Journal of Career Development, 39, 208–228. doi:10.1177/0894845311405321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, J., Bruch, M. A., & Haase, R. F. (2008). Role of perfectionism and five-factor model traits in career indecision. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 811–815. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka, N., Gati, I., & Kelly, K. R. (2008). Emotional and personality-related aspects of career-decision-making difficulties. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 403–424. doi:10.1177/1069072708318900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorikov, V. (2007). Continuity in adolescent career preparation and its effects on adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 8–24. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, K., Kerpelman, J., & Skorikov, V. (2012). A longitudinal examination of career preparation and adjustment during the transition from high school. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1343–1354. doi:10.1037/a0027296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, F., Nguyen, N., Basuray, T., & Darrow, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of personality on performance: How time-on-task moderates the mediation by self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 823–828. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M., Pan, W., & Newmeyer, M. D. (2008). Factors influencing high school students’ career aspirations. Professional School Counseling, 11, 285–295. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wille, B., Beyers, W., & De Fruyt, F. (2012). A transactional approach to person-environment fit: Reciprocal relations between personality development and career role growth across young to middle adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 307–321. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadama, G. N., & Pandey, S. (1995). Effect of sample size on goodness of fit indices in structural equation models. Journal of Social Services Research, 20, 49–70. doi:10.1300/J079v20n03_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dikla Brown or Rachel Gali Cinamon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, D., Cinamon, R.G. Personality traits’ effects on self-efficacy and outcome expectations for high school major choice. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance 16, 343–361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-015-9316-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-015-9316-4

Keywords

Navigation