Abstract
Though the number of interdisciplinary undergraduate programs has increased rapidly over the past several decades, little empirical research has characterized such programs. In this article we report on our investigation of the characteristics of interdisciplinary programs and develop typologies to describe the multiple ways in which such programs are structured with respect to curricular and organizational features. Using cluster analysis, we show differences in both curricular structures and organizational features across programs, irrespective of the program’s content focus. This typology will guide future research to explore differences in student learning outcomes across the interdisciplinary program types.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., Jackson, L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council of England. Leeds, United Kingdom: Evidence.
Aram, J. D. (2004). Concepts of interdisciplinarity: Configurations of knowledge and action. Human Relations, 57(4), 379–412.
Augsburg, T., & Henry, S. (2009). The politics of interdisciplinary studies: Essays on the transformations in American undergraduate programs. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
Bahr, P. R., Bielby, R., & House, E. (2011). The use of cluster analysis on typological research on community college students. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(S1), 67–81.
Benson, T. C. (1982). Five arguments against interdisciplinary studies. Issues in integrative studies, 1(1), 38–48.
Borden, V. M. H. (2005). Identifying and analyzing group differences. In M. A. Coughlin (Ed.), Intermediate/advanced statistics in institutional research (pp. 132–168). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.
Brint, S. G., Turk-Bicakci, L., Proctor, K., & Murphy, S. P. (2009). Expanding the social frame of knowledge: Interdisciplinary, degree-granting fields in American colleges and universities, 1975-2000. The Review of Higher Education, 32(2), 155–183.
Carp, R. M. (2001). Integrative praxes: Learning from multiple knowledge formations. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19(1), 71–121.
Collin, A. (2009). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary collaboration: Implications for vocational psychology. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 9(2), 101–110.
Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fish, S. (1989). Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. Profession, 89(1), 15–22.
Gnanadesikan, R., Kettenring, J. R., & Tsao, S. L. (1995). Weighting and selection of variables for cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 12(1), 113–136.
Holley, K. A. (2009). Challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. Higher Education, 58(2), 241–255.
Hunt, L., & Jorgensen, M. (2011). Clustering mixed data. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Data mining & knowledge discovery, 1(4), 352–361.
Hursh, B., Haas, P., & Moore, M. (1983). An interdisciplinary model to implement general education. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 42–49.
Jacobs, J. A., & Frickel, S. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 43–65.
Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: A review. ACM computing surveys, 31(3), 264–323.
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
Klein, J. T. (2010a). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Klein, J. T. (2010b). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman & J. T. Klein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Klein, J. T., & Newell, W. H. (1997). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In J. G. Gaff, J. L. Ratcliff, & Ratcliff & Associates (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 393–415). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kockelmans, J. (1979). Interdisciplinarity and higher education. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The route to normal science. In The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd Ed.), (pp. 10–22). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Lattuca, L. R., & Knight, D. B. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Defining and studying interdisciplinarity in engineering education. Proceedings of the 117 th annual conference of the American Society of Engineering Education . Louisville, KY: American Society for Engineering Education.
Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. S. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lattuca, L. R., Voigt, L. J., & Fath, K. Q. (2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23–48.
Miller, R. C. (1982). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues in Integrative Studies, 1(1), 1–37.
Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45(3), 325–342.
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1988). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 5(2), 181–204.
Moran, J. (2010). Interdisciplinarity: The new critical idiom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Academy of Sciences. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Institutes of Health. (2006). Summary of the President’s FY 2006 budget. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
National Science Board (2010). Ch. 2: Higher Education in Science and Engineering. In Science and Engineering Indicator, 2010, 21–2.48.
Newell, W. H. (1990). Interdisciplinary curriculum development. Issues in Integrative Studies, 8(1), 69–86.
Newell, W. H., & Green, W. J. (1982). Defining and teaching interdisciplinary studies. Improving College and University Teaching, 30(1), 23–30.
O’Donnell, A. M., & Derry, S. J. (2005). Cognitive processes in interdisciplinary groups: problems and possibilities. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 51–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(2), 247–277.
Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richards, D. G. (1996). The meaning and relevance of ‘synthesis” in interdisciplinary studies. The Journal of Education, 45(2), 114–28.
Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Ryan, M. P., & Genthon, M. (1988). Faculty reflect on course planning. Research in Higher Education, 29(3), 219–240.
Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Bentley, R. J., Ryan, M. P., Martens, G. G., Genthon, M. L., Wren, P. A., & Shaw, K. M. (1990). Planning introductory college courses: Influences on faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Steinley, D. (2007). Initializing K-means batch clustering: A critical evaluation of several techniques. Journal of Classification, 24(1), 99–121.
Terenzini, P. T., & Reason, R. D. (2005, November). Parsing the first-year of college: A conceptual framework for studying college impacts. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Philadelphia, PA.
Terenzini, P. T., & Reason, R. D. (2012). Rethinking between college-college effects on student learning: A new model to guide assessment and quality assurance. In R. Yamada & R. Mori (Eds.), Quality assurance for higher education and assessment: Higher education policy and quality assurance in globalization (pp. 7–22). Oslo, Norway: Center for Higher Education and Student Research, Doshisha University.
Toombs, W., & Tierney, W. G. (1991). Meeting the mandate: Renewing the college and departmental curriculum (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, No. 6). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Toombs, W., & Tierney, W. G. (1993). Curriculum definitions and reference points. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 175–195.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of American higher education. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.
Weingart, P., & Stehr, N. (2000). Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Wilson, J. K. (1999). The canon and the curriculum: Multicultural revolution and traditionalist revolt. In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 427–447). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knight, D.B., Lattuca, L.R., Kimball, E.W. et al. Understanding Interdisciplinarity: Curricular and Organizational Features of Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Programs. Innov High Educ 38, 143–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9232-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9232-1