Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics and the Social Dimension of Research Activities

  • Empirical Study/Analysis
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study identifies some of the ethical issues that arise in the everyday practice of researching in collecting interactional data. A form of conceptualizing ethics in research is proposed as awareness of the social dimension of research practices and their transformative nature. The collection of ethnographic data—including interviewing, observing, audiovisual recording, and other methods—is achieved by means of social interactions that necessarily imply issues of face, relevance, appropriateness, politeness, and identity, to name a few. Research activities have an impact on both the setting and the participants in the study, in fact, they become part of the setting studied. At times, participants may be using the research activity for their own ends. It is important for researchers to be aware of and responsible for the impact they have on the setting under study. Some ethical problems encountered conducting actual research activities are discussed as an illustration: issues related to negotiation of consent in semipublic settings and to the protection of informants’ anonymity. The actual resolution of these problems is presented as research findings from the everyday practice of doing research. Systematic reflection on the social and interactional dimension of how ethical decisions are taken during actual research activities could make legislation on the protection of research participants and ethical guidelines more realistic and useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The coordinator of the session is of Italian origin and the researcher is Italian.

References

  • ASA-American Sociological Association. (1999). Code of Ethics. Washington, DC, USA. http://www.asanet.org/images/asa/docs/pdf/CodeofEthics.pdf.

  • Barton, B. (2011). My auto/ethnographic dilemma: Who owns the story? Qualitative Sociology, 34, 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, G. (1981). Moral tales: Parents’ stories of encounters with the health profession. Sociology of Health and Illness, 3(3), 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blee, K. M., & Currier, A. (2011). Ethics beyond the IRB: An introductory essay. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brincker, B., & Gundelach, P. (2005). Sociologists in action. A critical exploration of the intervention method. Acta Sociológica, 48(4), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, M. I., Paoletti, I., & Rego, R. (2011). Para a melhoria dos serviços sociais a idosos pobres em Portugal. Intervenção Social nº, 37, 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro Johnson, G., & Paoletti, I. (2004). Orienting to the category “ordinary—but special”in an Australian-Italian courtship and marriage narrative. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. C., & Sharf, B. F. (2007). The dark side of truth(s): Ethical dilemmas in researching the personal. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., Cooke, P., Cursons, J., Milbourne, P., & Widdowfield, R. (2000). Ethics, reflexivity and research: Encounters with homeless people. Ethics, Place and Environment, 3(2), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D. (2006). Entangled (in the) sticks: Ethical conundrums of popular theatre as pedagogy and research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, R. (2013). Ethics on the move: Methodological dilemmas in the scientific writing process. In Paoletti, I., Tomás, M. I. & Menéndez, F. (Eds.), Practices of Ethics: An Empirical approach to Ethics in Social Sciences research. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • Currier, A. (2011). Representing gender and sexual dissidence in Southern Africa. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M. T., Brijnath, B., & Crockett, B. (2010). Ethics and the promotion of inclusiveness within qualitative research: Case example from Asia and the Pacific. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(5), 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2011). Action research literature 2008–2010: Themes and trends. Action Research, 9(2), 122–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D. S., & Atkinson, J. (2006). Competing ethical communities and a researcher’s ethical dilemma: The case of sexual harassers. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 292–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einwohner, R. L. (2011). Ethical considerations on the use of archived testimonies in Holocaust research: Beyond the IRB exemption. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives. Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. M., Lynch, M., & Livingstone, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, A. P., Santos, A. J. & Santos, C. (2013). Ethical and Methodological issues in violence against elderly people in Portugal: An intersection between sociological and epidemiological research. In I. Paoletti, M. I. Tomás F. & Menéndez (Eds.), Practices of ethics: An empirical approach to ethics in social sciences research. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • Giordano, J., O’Reilly, M., Taylor, H., & Dogra, N. (2007). Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research, 17(2), 264–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-López, G. (2011). Mindful ethics: Comments on informant-centered practices in social research. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, D., Pope, C., Mort, M., & Smith, A. (2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 567–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, S., & Francis, D. (1994). Doing data: The local organization of a sociological interview. British Journal of Sociology, 45, 675–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurdley, R. (2010). In the picture or off the wall? Ethical regulation, research habitus, and unpeopled ethnography. Quality Inquiry, 16(6), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K. (2006). Into the dark hearth of ethnography: The lived ethics and inequality of intimate field relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janovicek, N. (2006). Oral history and ethical practice: towards effective policies and procedures. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, A. M., & Fox, K. (2004). The process of informed consent what’s at stake?. Boston: Children Hospital Bostom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler Riessman, C., & Mattingly, C. (2005). Introduction: Toward a context-based ethics for social research in health. An International journal for the social study of health, illness and medicine, 9(4), 427–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, Henry A. (1958). Hawthorne Revisited. Ithaca.

  • Liberman, K. (1999). From walkabout to meditation: Craft and ethics in field inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C., & van der Zouwen, J. (Eds.). (2002). Standardization and tacit knowledge. Interaction and practice in the survey interview (pp. 243–261). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M. K. (2005). Ethical and friendly researchers, but not insiders: A response to blodgett, Boyer, and Turk. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/33/70.

  • Medford, K. (2006). Caught with a fake ID: Ethical questions about slippage in autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(5), 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2007). Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 2223–2234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (1990). Interpreting classroom climate: A study in a year five and six class. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(2), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (1998). Being an older woman. An interpretative study in the social construction of identity. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2000). Being a foreigner in primary school. Language and Education, 14(4), 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2001). Membership categorization and time appraisal in interviews with carers of disabled elderly. Human Studies, 24, 293–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2009). Communication and diagnostic work in medical emergency calls in Italy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18(2–3), 229–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2010). I fabbisogni comunicativi e l’accessibilità ai servizi socio-sanitari, in Primo Rapporto sull’ Immigrazione in Umbria (pp. 353–404). Perugia: AUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2012a). The issue of conversationally constituted context and localization problems in emergency calls. Text and Talk, 32(2), 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2012b). Operators’ emotional work in calls to the medical emergency number. Pragmatics, 22(4), 671–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2012c) Eliciting a response from an audience. Paper presented at the SLE 2012, 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea 29-Aug-2012–01-Sep-2012 Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Paoletti, I., & Cavallaro Johnson, G. (2007). Doing “being ordinary” in an interview narrative with a second generation Italian-Australian woman. In M. Bamberg, A. De Fina, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Selves and identities in narrative and discourse (pp. 89–105). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti and Carvalho, M. I. (2012). Aging, poverty and social services in Portugal: The importance of quality services, Indian Journal of Gerontology, 26(3). http://www.gerontologyindia.com/pdf/vol24-4.pdf.

  • Paoletti, I., Tomás, M. I. and Menéndez, F. (Eds.). (2013). Practices of ethics: An empirical approach to ethics in social sciences research. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • Poulos, C. N. (2008). Narrative conscience and the autoethnography adventure: Probing memories, secretes, shadows and possibilities. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, C., Tom, A., & Frisby, W. (2006). Finding the “action” in feminist participatory action research. Action Research, 4(3), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, H. M., & Schwartz, L. J. (2002). Ethics of qualitative research: Are there special issues for health services research? Family Practice, 19, 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2011). Going back and giving back: The ethics of staying in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (Ed.). (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S., & Hutchby, I. (2003). From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology, 37, 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. (2010). Sex, truths, and audiotapes: Anonymity and the ethics of exposure in public ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 554–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME An International e-journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swauger, M. (2011). Afterword: The ethics of risk, power and representation. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2001). Is research-ethics review a moral panic? Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2002). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2003). Is anonimity an artifact in ethnographic research? Journal of academic Ethics, 1, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdicombe, S. (1998). “But you don’t class yourself”: The interactional management of category membership and non-membership. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 52–70). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, G. R., & Prosser, S. (2002). Action research: politics, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(5), 587–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. J. (2006). The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, J. (2006). Psychic distance, consent and other ethical issues. Reflecting on the writing of “a gentle going”? Qualitative Inquiry, 12(4), 813–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, CLUNL, ID, Av. De Berna 26 C, 1069-061, Lisbon, Portugal

    Isabella Paoletti

Authors
  1. Isabella Paoletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabella Paoletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paoletti, I. Ethics and the Social Dimension of Research Activities. Hum Stud 37, 257–277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9299-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9299-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation