Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Who Detects Ecological Change After Catastrophic Events? Indigenous Knowledge, Social Networks, and Situated Practices

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detecting ecological change is a critical first step in the process of local-level adaptation, yet few studies have explored the factors that predict knowledge acquisition following catastrophic events. This article empirically assesses individual variation in the ability of Solomon Islanders to detect ecological change following the alteration of local, shallow-water, marine environments by a major tsunami. We compare the results of marine science surveys with local ecological knowledge of the benthos. We also examine multiple socioeconomic variables, and employ social network analysis to measure the influence of social and expert networks. Results show that villagers with salaried work who are at the intersection of local and global knowledge were the most adept at detecting tsunami-induced changes to benthic surfaces. Social networks had no statistically significant influence on villagers’ abilities to detect change. We argue that these results counter common conceptualizations of indigenous knowledge that emphasize its normative, shared, inter-generationally transmitted characteristics rather than its heterogeneity, emergence, and practical application. Our findings have implications for theory about the foundations of indigenous knowledge research and the design of disaster mitigation efforts or resource management programs that incorporate indigenous ecological knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We considered using data transformation techniques on several variables to provide more normal distributions, but the transformed data did not affect the outcome of our statistical analysis.

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 26: 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Bynum, N., Johnson, E., King, U., Mustonen, T., Neofotis, P., Oettlé, N., Rosenzweig, C., Sakakibara, C., and Shadrin, V. (2011). Linking Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge of Climate Change. BioScience 61: 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aswani, S. (1998). Patterns of Marine Harvest Effort in Southwestern New Georgia, Solomon Islands: Resource Management or Optimal Foraging? Ocean and Coastal Management 40: 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aswani, S., and Lauer, M. (2014). Indigenous people’s Detection of Rapid Ecological Change. Conservation Biology 28: 820–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aswani, S., M. Lauer, P. Weiant, L. Geelen, and S. Herman. (2004). The Roviana and Vonavona marine resource management project, final report, 2000–2004. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.

  • Atran, S., and Medin, D. L. (2008). The Native Mind and the Cultural Construction of Nature. Life and Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Medin, D., Ross, N., Lynch, E., Vapnarsky, V., Ek, E. U., Coley, J., Timura, C., and Baran, M. (2002). Folkecology, Cultural Epidemiology, and the Spirit of the Commons: A Garden Experiment in the Maya Lowlands, 1991–2001. Current Anthropology 43: 421–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. 1993. Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Perspective. In Inglis, J. (ed.), Traditional Ecological Knowledge Concepts and Cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge: International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Ont., Canada, pp. 1–10.

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bicker, A., Sillitoe, P., and Pottier, J. (2004). Investigating Local Knowledge: New Directions, new Approaches. Ashgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ö., and Prell, C. (2011). Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance. Cambrdige University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis

  • Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., and Labianca, G. (2009). Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science 323: 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S. (1986). Exchange of Varieties and Information Between Aguaruna Manioc Cultivators. American Anthropologist 88: 428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., Warren, D. M., and Werner, O. (1980). Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. University Press of America, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., and Wagner, J. R. (2003). Who Knows? On the Importance of Identifying “Experts” When Researching Local Ecological Knowledge. Human Ecology 31: 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, J. (2005). Use of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Marine Conservation. Conservation Biology 19: 1286–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. F. (ed.) (2007). Modern Crises and Traditional Strategies: Local Ecological Knowledge in Island Southeast Asia. Berghahn Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R., Parkes, P., and Bicker, A. (eds.) (2000). Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1999). After Nature: Steps to an Anti-Essentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology 40: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furusawa, T. (2009). Changing Ethnobotanical Knowledge of the Roviana People, Solomon Islands: Quantitative Approaches to its Correlation With Modernization. Human Ecology 37: 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gòmez-Baggethun, E., and Reyes-García, V. (2013). Reinterpreting Change in Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Human Ecology 41: 643–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. A., Purkis, S. J., and Phin, S. R. (2013). Coral Reef Remote Sensing. A Guide for Mapping, Monitoring and Management. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A., P. Lokani, W. Atu, P. Ramohia, P. Thomas, and J. Almany. (2006). Solomon Islands marine assessment: Technical report of survey conducted May 13 to June 17, 2004. TNC Pacific Islands Country Report No. 1/06.

  • Gupta, A. (1998). Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. Duke University Press, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, T. E. (1976). An Empirical Method for the Identification of Covert Categories in Ethnobiology. American Ethnologist 3: 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobart, M. (ed.) (1993). An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hviding, E. (1996). Guardians of Marovo Lagoon: Practice, Place, and Politics in Maritime Melanesia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P. P., and Sarvary, M. (2011). Network Effects and Personal Influences: The Diffusion of an Online Social Network. Journal of Marketing Research 48: 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kightley, E., Reyes-Garcia, V., Demps, K., Magtanong, R., Ramenzoni, V., Thampy, G., Gueze, M., and Stepp, J. (2013). An Empirical Comparison of Knowledge and Skill in the Context of Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9: 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, M. (2012). Oral Traditions or Situated Practices? Understanding how Indigenous Communities Respond to Environmental Disasters. Human Organization 71: 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, M., and Aswani, S. (2009). Indigenous Ecological Knowledge as Situated Practices: Understanding fishers’ Knowledge in the Western Solomon Islands. American Anthropologist 111: 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, M., and Aswani, S. (2010). Indigenous Knowledge and Long-Term Ecological Change: Detection, Interpretation, and Responses to Changing Ecological Conditions in Pacific Island Communities. Environmental Management 45: 985–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation Learning in Doing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J., Dominey-Howes, D., Kelman, I., and Lloyd, K. (2007). The Potential for Combining Indigenous and Western Knowledge in Reducing Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards in Small Island Developing States. Environmental Hazards 7: 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmagari, K., and Berkes, F. (1997). Transmission of Indigenous Knowledge and Bush Skills Among the Western James Bay Cree Women of Subarctic Canada. Human Ecology 25: 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., Vadez, V., Byron, E., Apaza, L., Leonard, W. R., Perez, E., and Wilkie, D. (2005). Market Economy and the Loss of Folk Knowledge of Plant Uses: Estimates from the Tsimane’ of the Bolivian Amazon. Current Anthropology 46: 651–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., Vadez, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., and McDade, T. (2007). Economic Development and Local Ecological Knowledge: A Deadlock? Quantitative Research from a Native Amazonian Society. Human Ecology 35: 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., Molina, J. L., Calvet-Mir, L., Aceituno-Mata, L., Lastra, J. J., Ontillera, R., Parada, M., Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Rigat, M., Vallès, J., and Garnatje, T. (2013). “Tertius Gaudens”: Germplasm Exchange Networks and Agroecological Knowledge Among Home Gardeners in the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9: 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1993). Cultivation: Knowledge or Performance? In Hobart, M. (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. Routledge, London, pp. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. (2002). Lacandon-Maya Intergenerational Change and the Erosion of Folkbiological Knowledge. In Stepp, J. R., Wyndham, E. S., and Zarger, R. K. (eds.), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity. International Society of Ethnobiology, Athens, pp. 585–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes, R. E. (1994). Burning the Library of Amazonia. The Sciences 34: 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon Islands Government. (2011). Report on the 2009 population and housing census: Basic tables and census description. Solomon Islands National Statistics Office

  • Spoon, J. (2011). The Heterogeneity of Khumbu Sherpa Ecological Knowledge and Understanding in Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park and Buffer Zone, Nepal. Human Ecology 39: 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. D. (2007). Agricultural Deskilling and the Spread of Genetically Modified Cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology 48: 67–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W., Briggs, R. W., Frohlich, C., Brown, A., Hornbach, M., Papabatu, A. K., Meltzner, A. J., and Billy, D. (2008). Rupture Across arc Segment and Plate Boundaries in the 1 April 2007 Solomons Earthquake. Nature Geoscience 1: 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D. (2000). Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. Harwood Academic, Amsterdam.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vandebroek, I., and Balick, M. J. (2012). Globalization and Loss of Plant Knowledge: Challenging the Paradigm. PLoS One 7, e37643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zarger, R. (2011). Learning Ethnobiology. In Anderson, E. N., Pearsall, D., Hunn, E., and Turner, N. (eds.), Ethnobiology. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp. 371–387.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zarger, R., and Stepp, J. (2004). Persistence of Botanical Knowledge Among Tzeltal Maya Children. Current Anthropology 45: 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zent, S. (2009). A Geneology of Scientific Representations of Indigenous Knowledge. In Heckler, S. (ed.), Landscape, Process, and Power: Re-Evaluating Traditional Environmental Knowledge. Berghahn Books, New York, pp. 19–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent, S. (2013). The Processsural Perspectives on Traditional Environmental Knowledge: Continuity, Erosion, Transformation, Innovation. In Ellen, R., Lycett, S. J., and Johns, S. E. (eds.), Understanding Cultural Transmission in Anthropology: A Critical Synthesis. Berghahn Books, New York, pp. 213–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the people of Vonavona Lagoon for supporting this research. In particular, we thank Nixon Tooler, Tungama Gua, and Lawrence Buka as well as graduate students Luke Campanella and Ben Nugent for their help in data collection, and Lynetta Campbell for her assistance with statistical analysis. Thanks also to Rence Sore, Permanent Secretary of the Solomon Islands Ministry of Environment, Conservation, and Meteorology. We acknowledge the valuable input of three anonymous reviewers. The National Science Foundation Human Dimensions and Social Dynamics Program (NSF Award #0827022) and San Diego State University generously provided financial support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Lauer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest. IRB approval for this research was granted by San Diego State University Foundation. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lauer, M., Matera, J. Who Detects Ecological Change After Catastrophic Events? Indigenous Knowledge, Social Networks, and Situated Practices. Hum Ecol 44, 33–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9811-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9811-3

Keywords

Navigation