Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

First Nations Values in Protected Area Governance: Tla-o-qui-aht Tribal Parks and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past few decades there has been increasing attention paid to ‘shared’ forms of governance and to the creation of new protected areas (PAs) that are designed to address ‘non-biological’ goals and values. The rationale for these initiatives has, in part, been based on the belief that well-designed systems of protected area governance will help to deliver desired outcomes and meet linked sociocultural, economic and environmental objectives. Addressing these questions has become increasingly important in British Columbia, where a number of First Nations are asserting increasing control over existing state-run protected areas, as well as establishing new protected areas and designing governance systems for them that deliver outcomes consonant with cultural beliefs, values and goals. This paper reports on an in-depth case study of the Tla-o-qui-aht Tribal Parks and the Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, with a focus on comparing how these physically adjacent protected areas with different objectives each attempt to meaningfully engage the Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation in PA governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Funding for PAPR comes from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the International Development Research Centre under the International Community-University Research Alliance Program.

  2. There are a total of 12 reserves for the Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation.

  3. The Nuu-chah-nulth were formerly mislabeled by settler communities as the Nootka.

  4. The Toquaht Nation and the Uchucklesaht Tribe are in close proximity and are also working with the Park (Parks Canada 2010a).

  5. One of the principal Tribal Parks proponents we talked with noted that some of the inspiration has come from the Navajo Nation Tribal Parks.

  6. The land use plan requires that any timber harvesting have “…the explicit approval of Tla-o-qui-aht Hawiih, using single-stem harvesting or other ‘salmon-based logging’ methods.”

  7. The Tla-o-qui-aht community is further organized into houses or family clans with a head for each house. These heads are referred to as “Ta’ii aqkin” and have access the Ha’huulthii of their Ha’wiih.

  8. The Tribal Parks usage of the term Park is interesting to consider in the light of some critiques of the use of value-laden terms such as protected areas or parks in describing areas falling under IUCN categories V and VI, suggesting that these terms should refer to areas where the conservation of biodiversity (or similar ecological goals) should be paramount and other terms should be developed to describe areas with a broader range of desired outcomes (Locke and Dearden 2005).

References

  • Adams, W. M., and Hutton, J. (2007). People, Parks, and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation and Society 5(2): 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. (ed.) (2000). Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. UBC Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., West, P. C., et al. (1991). Resident peoples and protected areas: a framework for inquiry. In West, P. C., and Brechin, S. R. (eds.), Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, B., and Whande, W. (2007). Whims of the Winds of Time? Emerging Trends in Biodiversity Conservation and Protected Area Management. Conservation and Society 5(1): 22–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M. M., and Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006). Poverty Risks and National Parks: Policy Issues in Conservation and Resettlement. World Development 34(10): 1808–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, M. (2004). A challenge to conservationists. World Watch Magazine November/December 2004: 17–31.

  • Chunick, C. (2006). Report on the Sencot’en Alliance’s Partnership in the Planning and Management of the Gulf Islands National Park Reserve. Environmental Law Clinic, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., Fluker, S., and Risby, L. (2008). Deconstructing ecological integrity in Canada’s national parks. In Hanna, K. S., Clark, D. A., and Slocombe, D. S. (eds.), Transforming Parks and Protected Areas: Policy and Governance in a Changing World. Routledge, New York, pp. 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchester, M. (1997). Salvaging nature: indigenous peoples and protected areas. In Ghimire, K. B., and Pimbert, M. P. (eds.), Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P., and Berg, L. D. (1993). Canada’s National Parks: A Model of Administrative Penetration. The Canadian Geographer 37(3): 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P., and Dempsey, J. (2004). Protected Areas in Canada: Decade of Change. The Canadian Geographer 48(2): 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P., and Langdon, S. (2009). Aboriginal peoples and national parks. In Dearden, P., and Rollins, R. (eds.), Parks and Protected Areas in Canada: Planning and Management, 3rd ed. Oxford Press, Don Mills, pp. 373–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, K. M. (1991). Joint management of Canada’s national parks. In West, P. C., and Brechin, S. R. (eds.), Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, pp. 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, E. (2008). The Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation. In Arbour, D., Kuecks, B, and Edwards, D. (eds.), Nuu-chah-nulth Central Region First Nations Governance Structures 2007/2008. Ecotrust Canada. Accessed online April 22 at http://www.ecotrust.ca/sites/all/files/ECReport-FNGovernance.pdf.

  • Fortwangler, C. L. (2003). The winding road: incorporating social justice and human rights into protected area politics. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature: Promoting International Biodiversity Conservation with Social Justice in the 21st Century. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. (2001). First Nations Cooperative Management of Protected Areas in British Columbia: Foundation and Tools. CPAWS and Ecotrust Canada, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wa, Gisday, and Uukw, Delgam (1989). The Spirit in the Land: Statements of the Gitksam and Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. 1987–1990. Reflections, Gabriola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladu, J. P. (2003). Aboriginal Experiences in Canada—Parks and Protected Areas. Boreal Footprint Project, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R. (1991). Prerequisites for Ethnic Identity and Survival. In West, P. C., and Brechin, S. R. (eds.), Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies for International Conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, K., and Crookes, N. (2009). A Report on the status of the First Nations Program: Looking back at what we have accomplished. Unpublished memo.

  • Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) (2011). Information accessed April 22, 2011 at: http://pse5-esd5.ainc-inac.gc.ca/fnp/Main/Search/FNMain.aspx?BAND_NUMBER=660&lang=eng.

  • IUCN (2011) Information retrieved October, 2011 from http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/pa/pa_products/wcpa_categories/.

  • King, L. (2004). Conflicting Knowledge Systems in the Management of Fish and Forests in the Pacific Northwest. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4: 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H., and Dearden, P. (2005). Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation 36: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maa-Nulth First Nations (2010). Maa-Nulth First Nations, Online at: http://www.manulth.ca. Accessed April 16, 2010.

  • McAvoy, L., McDonald, D., and Carlson, M. (2003). American Indian/First Nation Place Attachment to Park Lands: The Case of the Nuu-chah-nulth of British Columbia. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 21(2): 88–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1972). The origins of Pacific Rim National Park. In Nelson, J. G., and Cordes, L. D. (eds.), Pacific Rim: An Ecological Approach to a New Canadian Park. Studies in Land Use History and Landscape Change, National Park Series. University of Calgary, Calgary, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notzke, C. (1995). A New Perspective in Aboriginal Natural Resource Management: Co-management. Geoforum 26(2): 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council (NTC) (2011). Information accessed April 24, 2011 at http://www.nuuchahnulth.org/tribal-council/treaty.html.

  • Parks Canada (2008). Pacific Rim National Park Reserves of Canada: State of the Park Report. Ottawa Parks Canada.

  • Parks Canada (2010a). Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat (AAS). Online at http://www.pc.gc.ca/culture/proj/saa-aas/intro.aspx Accessed January 3, 2011.

  • Parks Canada (2010b) Pacific Rim National Park Reserve of Canada: Management Plan. http://www.pc.gc.ca/pn-np/bc/pacificrim/plan/plan4.aspx Accessed January 4, 2011.

  • Pimbert, M. P., and Pretty, J. N. (1997). Parks, people, and professionals: Putting participation into protected area management. In Ghimire, K. B., and Pimbert, M. P. (eds.), Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D. (2008). The Origins and Evolution of the Conservation-Poverty Debate: A Review of Key Literature, Events, and Policy Processes. Oryx 42(4): 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro Mabee, H., and Hoberg, G. (2006). Equal Partners? Assessing Comanagement of Forest Resources in Clayoquot Sound. Society and Natural Resources 19: 875–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timko, J. A., and Satterfield, T. (2008). Seeking Social Equity in National Parks: Experiments with Evaluation in Canada and South Africa. Conservation and Society 6(3): 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzner, V., and Manseau, M. (2001). Taking the pulse of collaborative management in Canada’s national parks and national park reserves: voices from the field. In Harmon, D. (ed.), Crossing Boundaries in Park Management: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands. The George Wright Society, Hancock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M., and Brandon, K. (1992). People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. The World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, P. C., and Brechin, S. R. (eds.) (1991). Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D., and Wright, M. R. (1994). The background to community-based conservation. In Western, D., Wright, M. R., and Strum, S. C. (eds.), Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, D. S., Morelli, G. A., Demmer, J., Starkey, M., Telfer, P., et al. (2007). Parks and People: Assessing the Human Welfare Effects of Establishing Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation Biology 20(1): 247–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors very much wish to acknowledge Eli Enns, Saya Masso, Joe Martin, Tsimka Martin, Gisele Martin, Tammy Dorward, and Terry Dorward of the Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation and Nadine Crookes, Bob Hansen, Karen Haugen, Keith Morrison, and Carley Duckmanton from Pacific Rim National Park Reserve for their role in the PAPR research project. Their assistance has been invaluable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant Murray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, G., King, L. First Nations Values in Protected Area Governance: Tla-o-qui-aht Tribal Parks and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve. Hum Ecol 40, 385–395 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9495-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9495-2

Keywords

Navigation