Abstract
We examined the relationship between the proportion of time spent in the mammography exam room relative to the total visit time and the rate of repeat visits across mammography facilities. We hypothesized that the means for these proportions would be greater among facilities with high repeat rates compared to those with low repeat rates. The beta distribution was used to model the proportions. However, not all of the observations were observed as some were (right- or interval-) censored due to the inability to observe complete information (e.g., time of arrival at the facility) to calculate the proportions for some observations. Using a maximum likelihood approach, we estimated the mean proportion of time spent during appointments on the actual exams. To analyze these data we utilized survival analysis methods, which typically are applied to data on time scales, to analyze these data restricted to the range (0, 1). We found that facilities with high repeat mammography rates on average had a greater proportion of their visits spent receiving the exams than the low repeat rate facilities (p = 0.0003). Women from low repeat rate facilities spent on average 45 % of their appointment time engaging in the exam; thus, these women averaged more time waiting for the exam to begin than receiving the exam. Conversely, those from high repeat rate facilities averaged more of their appointment time engaging in the mammographic exams. These findings were consistent with our hypothesis that women would have greater satisfaction with their mammography appointments—and thus be more likely to return for routine screening—in facilities where their appointments were more efficient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agresti, A.: Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)
American Cancer Society: Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2010. American Cancer Society, Atlanta (2010)
Barker, N.: A practical introduction to the bootstrap using the SAS system. SAS Conference Proceedings: Phuse 2005. http://www.lexjansen.com/phuse/2005/pk/pk02.pdf (2009). Accessed 24 Aug 2009
Casella, G., Berger, R.L.: Statistical Inference, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove (2002)
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (1993)
Engelman, K.K., Jianas, L., Nazir, N., Mahnken, J.D., Ellerbeck, E.F.: Mammography Facilities: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Ann. Behav. Med. 37, S130 (2009)
Ferrari, S.P., Cribari-Neto, F.: Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J. Appl. Stat. 31, 799–815 (2004)
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B.: Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)
Givens, G.H., Hoeting, J.A.: Computational Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)
Hogg, R.V., Craig, A.T.: Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1995)
Kendall, M., Stuart, A.: The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 2: Inference and Relationship, 4th edn. Charles Griffin & Company Limited, High Wycombe (1979)
Klein, J.P., Moeschberger, M.L.: Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. Springer, New York (1997)
Knapp, R.: Unconstrained Optimization, Wolfram Research, Inc. http://www.wolfram.com/learningcenter/tutorialcollection/UnconstrainedOptimization/UnconstrainedOptimization.pdf 2010. Accessed 19 Aug 2010
Lawless, J.F.: Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)
Peipins, L.A., Shapiro, J.A., Bobo, J.K., Berkowitz, Z.: Impact of women’s experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening. Cancer Causes Control 17, 439–447 (2006)
Turnbull, B.W.: The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 38, 290–295 (1976)
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the American Cancer Society (CPHPS-111021) and The University of Kansas Cancer Center Biostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource for supporting this research. The authors also acknowledge the helpful critiques and suggestions provided by the Reviewers and Editors assigned to this manuscript that served to strengthen this study. The authors also thank Alexandra R. Brown for her assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahnken, J.D., He, J., Yeh, HW. et al. Survival analysis applied to proportion data: comparing mammography visits in high and low repeat rate facilities. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 13, 68–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0084-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0084-z