Skip to main content
Log in

The Cold War Context of the Golden Jubilee, Or, Why We Think of Mendel as the Father of Genetics

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In September 1950, the Genetics Society of America (GSA) dedicated its annual meeting to a “Golden Jubilee of Genetics” that celebrated the 50th anniversary of the rediscovery of Mendel’s work. This program, originally intended as a small ceremony attached to the coattails of the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) meeting, turned into a publicity juggernaut that generated coverage on Mendel and the accomplishments of Western genetics in countless newspapers and radio broadcasts. The Golden Jubilee merits historical attention as both an intriguing instance of scientific commemoration and as an early example of Cold War political theatre. Instead of condemning either Lysenko or Soviet genetics, the Golden Jubilee would celebrate Mendel – and, not coincidentally, the practical achievements in plant and animal breeding his work had made possible. The American geneticists’ focus on the achievements of Western genetics as both practical and theoretical, international, and, above all, non-ideological and non-controversial, was fully intended to demonstrate the success of the Western model of science to both the American public and scientists abroad at a key transition point in the Cold War. An implicit part of this article’s argument, therefore, is the pervasive impact of the Cold War in unanticipated corners of postwar scientific culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abir-Am, Pnina G. 1992. “A Historical Ethnography of a Scientific Anniversary in Molecular Biology: The First Protein X-Ray Photograph.” Social Epistemology 6: 323–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abir-Am, Pnina G. 1999. “Introduction.” Pnina G. Abir-Am and Clark A. Elliot (eds.), Commemorative Practices in Science: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Collective Memory. Osiris 2nd Ser. 14, pp. 1–33.

  • Abir-Am, Pnina G. and Elliot, Clark A. (eds.). 1999. Commemorative Practices in Science: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Collective Memory. Osiris 2nd Ser. 14.

  • Adams, Mark B. 1972. “Genetics and the Soviet Scientific Community, 1948–1965.” PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Allen, Garland E. 2003. “Mendel and Modern Genetics: The Legacy for Today.” Endeavor 27(2): 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, G.W. 1951. “Chemical Genetics.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 221–240.

  • Brannigan, Augustine. 1979. “The Reification of Gregor Mendel.” Social Studies of Science 9: 423–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Elof A. 1981. Genes, Radiation, and Society: The Life and Work of H. J. Muller. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, W.E. 1951. “The Beginnings of Mendelism in America.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 59–76.

  • Comfort, Nathaniel C. 2001. The Tangled Field: Barbara McClintock’s Search for the Patterns of Genetic Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, Joseph. 1994. “The Rockefeller Foundation’s Mexican Agricultural Project: A Cross-Cultural Encounter, 1943–1949.” Marcos Cueto (ed.), Missionaries of Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Latin America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. 2008. Heredity and Hope: The Case for Genetics Screening. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, Nicholas John. 2008. The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy, 1945–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C.D. 1951. “Mendel and the Determinants.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 315–332.

  • deJong-Lambert, William and Krementsov, Nikolai. This volume. “Introduction.”

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 2008. “Striking the Hornet’s Nest: Richard Goldschmidt’s Rejection of the Particulate Gene.” Oren Harman and Michael R. Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 119–136.

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1951. “Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Mendelian Populations and Their Evolution. New York: Macmillan, pp. 573–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.C. (ed.). 1951. Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephrussi, Boris. 1951. “Remarks on Cell Heredity.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 241–262.

  • Fisher, Ronald A. 1936. “Has Mendel’s Work Been Rediscovered?’ Annals of Science 1: 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, Deborah. 1994. “Exporting American Agriculture: The Rockefeller Foundation in Mexico, 1943–1953.” Marcos Cueto (ed.), Missionaries of Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Latin America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 72–96.

  • Fowler, Glenn. 1989. “Paul Mangelsdorf, Botanist, 90.” New York Times 28 July.

  • Fuller, Steve. 2000. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, John R. (ed.). 1994. Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1951. “The Impact of Genetics upon Science.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 1–24.

  • Gormley, Melinda. 2009. “Scientific Discrimination and the Activist Scientist: L. C. Dunn and the Professionalization of Genetics and Human Genetics in the United States.” JHB 42: 33–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Loren. 1972. Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Oren Solomon. 2003. “C. D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science.” JHB 36: 309–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, Jonathan. 1993. Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, Robin Marantz. 2001. The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel the Father of Genetics. New York: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, David A. 1983. “The Defense of Democracy and Robert K. Merton’s Formulation of the Scientific Ethos.” Knowledge and Society 4: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, Sidney. 1987. Out of Step: An Unquiet Life in the 20th Century. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian. 1951. “Genetics, Evolution, and Human Destiny.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 591–621.

  • Joravsky, David. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A ‘Second Front’ in Soviet Genetics: The International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy, 1944–1947.” JHB 29: 226–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, Nikolai. 1997. Stalinist Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, Nikolai. 2007. “In the Shadow of the Bomb: U. S.–Soviet Biomedical Relations in the Early Cold War, 1944–1948.” Journal of Cold War Studies 9: 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krige, John. 2006. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, Jennifer S. 2003. From Warfare to Welfare: Defense Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindee, Susan. 2005. Moments of Truth in Genetic Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lush, Jay L. 1951. “Genetics and Animal Breeding.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 493–526.

  • Mangelsdorf, Paul C. 1951. “Hybrid Corn: Its Genetic Basis and Its Significance in Human Affairs.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 555–572.

  • Matchett, Karin. 2006. “At Odds Over Inbreeding: An Abandoned Attempt at Mexico/United States Collaboration to ‘Improve’ Mexican Corn, 1940–1950.” JHB 39: 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, Kenneth. 1951. “The Progress and Prospect of Biometrical Genetics.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 111–126.

  • Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William B (eds.). 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, Walter A. 1985. The Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age. New York: Basic Books.

  • Medvedev, Z.A. 1971. The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko, trans. by I. Michael Lerner. New York, Anchor Books.

  • Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H.J. 1951. “The Development of Gene Theory.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 77–100.

  • Olby, Robert. 1979. “Mendel No Mendelian?” History of Science 17: 53–72.

  • Owen, Ray. 2007. Malcolm Robert Irwin, 18971897: A Biographical Memoir. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science.

  • Paul, Diane B. 1983. “A War on Two Fronts: J. B. S. Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” JHB 16: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Diane B. 1996. Controlling Human Heredity, 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, L.S. 1951. “Genetics of the Human Race.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 393–400.

  • Pfeiffer, John. 1950. Genetics: The Science of Heredity. Public Affairs Pamphlet No. 165. New York: Public Affairs Committee.

  • Richmond, Marsha L. 2006. “The 1909 Darwin Celebration: Reexamining Evolution in the Light of Mendel, Mutation, and Meiosis.” Isis 97: 447–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Sapp, Jan. 1990. “The Nine Lives of Gregor Mendel.” H.E. Le Grand (ed.), Experimental Inquiries: Historical, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Experimentation in Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 137–66.

  • Selya, Rena. This volume. “Defending Scientific Freedom and Democracy: The Genetics Society of America’s Response to Lysenko.”

  • Shaw, George Bernard. 1949. “Behind the Lysenko Controversy.” Saturday Review of Literature 16 April: 10–11.

  • Shepherd, Chris J. 2005. “Imperial Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Agricultural Science in Peru, 1940–1960.” Science as Culture 14: 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolution Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1999. “The 1959 Darwinian Celebration in America.” Pnina G. Abir-Am and Clark A. Elliot (eds.), Commemorative Practices in Science: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Collective Memory. Osiris 2nd Ser. 14, pp. 274–323.

  • Snyder, Lawrence H. 1951. “Old and New Pathways in Human Genetics.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 369–392.

  • Sonneborn, T.M. 1951. “The Role of Genes in Cytoplasmic Inheritance.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 291–314.

  • Soyfer, Valery N. 1994. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science, trans. by Leo Gruliow and Rebecca Gruliow. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  • Sturtevant, A.H. 1951. “The Relation of Genes and Chromosomes.” L.C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century: Essays on the Progress of Genetics During Its First 50 Years. New York: Macmillan, pp. 101–110.

  • Travis, Anthony. 2006. “Decadence, Decline, and Celebration: Raphael Meldola and the Mauve Jubilee of 1906.” History and Technology 22: 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wailoo, Keith and Pemberton, Stephen. 2006. The Troubled Dream of Genetic Medicine: Ethnicity and Innovation in Tay-Sachs, Cystic Fibrosis, and Sickle Cell Disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jessica. 1999. American Science in an Age of Anxiety: Scientists, Anticommunism, and the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jessica. 2002. “Scientists and the Problem of the Public in Cold War America.” Osiris 2nd Ser. 17: 323–347.

  • Wolfe, Audra J. 2010. “What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40: 48–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audra J. Wolfe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfe, A.J. The Cold War Context of the Golden Jubilee, Or, Why We Think of Mendel as the Father of Genetics. J Hist Biol 45, 389–414 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9291-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9291-7

Keywords

Navigation