Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of History in Science

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The case often made by scientists (and philosophers) against history and the history of science in particular is clear. Insofar as a field of study is historical as opposed to law-based, it is trivial. Insofar as a field attends to the past of science as opposed to current scientific issues, its efforts are derivative and, by diverting attention from acquiring new knowledge, deplorable. This case would be devastating if true, but it has almost everything almost exactly wrong. The study of history and the study of laws are not mutually exclusive, but unavoidably linked. Neither can be pursued without the other. Much the same can be said of the history of science. The history of science is neither a distraction from “real” science nor even merely a help to science. Rather, the history of science is an essential part of each science. Seeing that this is so requires a broader understanding of both history and science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beatty, John. 1998. Personal communication, especially in connection with the Dibner-MBL Seminar in the History of Biology, 1998 “Why Does History Matter: Biology as a Historical Science”.

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1997. ‘Non-Overlapping Magisteria.’ Natural History 106: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Frederic Lawrence. 1991–1993. Hans Krebs, vols. 1–2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Holmes, Frederic Lawrence, et al. (eds.). 2003. Reworking the Bench: Research Notebooks in the History of Science. Dordrecht:Kluwer.

  • Maienschein, Jane, et al. 2009. ‘Focus: What is the Value of History of Science?’ Isis 99: 318–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1959. ‘Where Are We?’ Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4501, USA

    Richard Creath

Authors
  1. Richard Creath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Creath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Creath, R. The Role of History in Science. J Hist Biol 43, 207–214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9208-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9208-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation