Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

From a Howling Wilderness to Howling Safaris: Science, Policy and Red Wolves in the American South

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article details the complex natural and cultural history of red wolf (Canis rufus) restoration in the American South. The decisions and methods utilized in the red wolf’s recovery after 1960 were unprecedented and creative but not geographically limited. The federal red wolf recovery experiment highlights the debate over what constitutes a species in a dynamic world, and the practical challenges and unexpected results in endangered species management in peopled landscapes. This wildlife restoration story illustrates not only the “hands-on” management role humans played, and continue to play, but also reveals cultural assumptions about what constitutes a “wild” wolf and about the necessity of wilderness. The red wolf recovery project provides constructive lessons for future species restoration involving flora and fauna on public and private land, and demonstrates human and animal engagement in the making of nature and culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alagona, Peter S. 2004. ‹Biography of a ‹Feathered Pig’: The California Condor Conservation Controversy.’ Journal of the History of Biology 37(3): 557–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulerich, Richard J. 1966. ‹The Wolf.’ National Parks Magazine 40(230): 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, Mark V. Jr. 2002. ‹Science, Sentiment, and the Specter of Extinction: Reconsidering Birds of Prey during America’s Interwar Years.’ Environmental History 7(1): 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, William. 1973. Travels Through North and South Carolina, Georgia, East and West Florida. A Facsimile of the 1792 London Edition Embellished with its Nine Original Plates. Savannah, GA:Beehive Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Rick. 1992. The Ninemile Wolves. Livingston, MT:Clark City Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiata, Mary. 2006. “Among Us.” Washington Post Magazine (16 April): W06.

  • Beyer, Arthur B. 2007. ‹Checked Out By a Wolf!.’ International Wolf 17(4): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolgiano, Chris. 1992. ‹The Fall of the Wild.’ Wilderness 55(196): 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camuto, Christopher. 1997. Another Country: Journeying Toward the Cherokee Mountains. New York, NY:Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardillo, Marcel, Mace, Georgina M., Gittleman, John L. and Purvis, Andy. 2006. Laten extinction risk and the future battleground of mammal conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(11): 4157–4161.

  • Cardillo, Marcel, Purvis, Andy, Sechrest, Wes, Gittleman, John L, Biebly, Jon, Mace, Georgina M. 2004. ‹Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World’s Carnivores.’ PLoS Biology 2(7): 0909–0914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, James C. 1993. The Selling of the South: The Southern Crusade for Industrial Development 1936–1990, 2nd ed. Urbana:University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Jeffrey P. 1991. ‹The New Breeding Ground.’ National Parks 1(2): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Jon T. 2004. Vicious: Wolves and Men in America. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowdrey, Albert E. 1996. This Land, This South: An Environmental History, Rev ed. Lexington:University Press of Kentucky.

  • Coyne, Jerry A, Orr, H. Allen. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA:Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, William. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England, 1st ed. New York, NY:Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, William. 1995. ‹The Trouble with Wilderness; or Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.’ William Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York, NY:W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech, Brian, Krausman, Paul R. 2001. The Endangered Species Act: History, Conservation Biology, and Public Policy. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBlieu, Jan. 1991. Meant to be Wild: The Struggle to Save Endangered Species Through Captive Breeding. Golden, CO:Fulcrum Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBlieu, Jan. 1992. “Could the Red Wolf Be a Mutt?” New York Times Magazine, 14 June, pp. 30–31, 42–46.

  • Denton, David. 2007. “Hunter Education and Red Wolf Restoration.” International Wolf 17(4): 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Thomas R. 1988. Saving America’s Wildlife. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, Lawrence S. 1983. ‹When Wolves Roamed North Carolina.’ Wildlife in North Carolina 47(12): 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, Lawrence S. 1991. ‹Return of the Natives.’ Wildlife in North Carolina 55(8): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editors. 1986. “The Red Wolf Comes Home”. Christian Science Monitor, 17 November.

  • Fahrenthold, David A. 2007. “Unexpected Urbanites: Cacophonous Coyotes.” Washington Post (16 April): B1.

  • Fish and Wildlife Service, United States. 1990. Red Wolf Recovery Plan. Atlanta, GA:Southeast Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish and Wildlife Service, United States. 1992. Red Wolf Recovery Program: Five Year Summary, 1987–1992. Available online: http://www.timberwolfinformation.org/updates/redwolf/fiveyr.html (Last accessed December 3, 2008).

  • Fish and Wildlife Service, United States. 1999. Red Wolf Hybridization with Coyotes: Initial Phase of the Management Plan. Red Wolf News 1(3), 26 November: 1. Available online: http://www.fws.gov/redwolf/rwnews/rwnews1–3.pdf (Last accessed December 3, 2008).

  • Fish and Wildlife Service, United States. 2006. Endangered Red Wolves (December). Washington, DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Fish and Wildlife Service, United States. 2007a. Red Wolf Journal (January). Available online: http://www.fws.gov/alligatorriver/rwnews/Red%20Wolf%20Journal%205opt.pdf (Last accessed June 1, 2008).

  • Fish and Wildlife Service, United States. 2007b. Red Wolf (Canis rufus) 5-Year Status Review: Summary and Evaluation. Available (28 September). Available online: http://www.fws.gov/southeast/5yearReviews/5yearreviews/RedWolf–5YrR.pdf (Last accessed December 3, 2008).

  • Flader, Susan. 1994. Thinking Like a Mountain: Aldo Leopold and the Evolution of an Ecological Attitude Toward Deer, Wolves, and Forests. Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelman, Valerie M. 1989. ‹American Attitudes Towards Wolves: A History of Misperception.’ Environmental Review 13(1): 63–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbreath, Jennifer D. and Phillips, Michael K. 1996. “Red wolves and private land”. Nina Fascione and Maria Cecil (eds.), Defenders of Wildlife’s Wolves of America Conference Proceedings, 14–16 November, Albany, NY, pp. 161–164.

  • Haig, Susan M. 1998. ‹Molecular Contributions to Conservation.’ Ecology 79(2): 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, PW, Lee, RN, Garrigan, D. 2002. ‹Major Histocompatibility Complex Variation in Red Wolves: Evidence for Common Ancestry With Coyotes and Balancing Selection.’ Molecular Ecology 11(10): 1905–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, Diane. 2007. ‹Red Wolf Restoration: A Twenty Year Journey.’ International Wolf 17(4): 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, Jody. 2006. ‹On the Failure of Modern Species Concepts.’ Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(8): 447–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holaday, Bobbie. 2003. Return of the Mexican Gray Wolf: Back to the Blue. Tucson:University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, Jack Temple. 1995. Poquosin: A Study of Rural Landscape & Society. Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, Gail Y B, Black, Pamela. 2005. Red Wolves: Creating Economic Opportunity Through Ecotourism in Rural North Carolina. Washington, DC:Defenders of Wildlife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledig, F Thomas. 1988. ‹The Conservation of Diversity in Forest Trees: Why and How Should Genes Be Conserved?’ BioScience 38(7): 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, Aldo. 1949. A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, Richard. 1992. Endangered and Other Protected Species: Federal Law and Regulation. Washington, DC:Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Barry Holstun. 1978. Of Wolves and Men. New York, NY:Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, John. 1995. “Red Wolf Showdown”. Audubon (March–April): 22–24.

  • Markham, Doug. 1993. “Smokies Homecoming”. Defenders (Fall): 9–15.

  • McCarley, Howard. 1962. ‹The Taxonomic Status of Wild Canis (Canidae) in the South Central United States.’ The Southwestern Naturalist 7(3/4): 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, Rick. 1995. War Against the Wolf: America’s Campaign to Exterminate the Wolf. Stillwater, MN:Voyageur Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech, David L. 1966. “The wolves of Isle Royale.” In Fauna of the national parks of the United States Fauna series no. 7. Washington, DC: G.P.O. Available online: http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS47783 (Last accessed December 3, 2008).

  • Mech, L David. 1970. The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species, 1st ed. Garden City, NY:Natural History Press. Published for the American Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech, L David. 1995. ‹The Challenge and Opportunity of Recovering Wolf Populations.’ Conservation Biology 9(2): 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech, L David. 1998. The Wolves of Denali. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine, Curt, Soule, Michael, Noss, Reed F. 2006. ‹“A Mission-Driven Discipline”: The Growth of Conservation Biology.’ Conservation Biology 20(3): 631–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mighetto, Lisa. 1991. Wild Animals and American Environmental Ethics. Tucson:University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitman, Gregg. 1996. ‹When Nature Is the Zoo: Vision and Power in the Art and Science of Natural History.’ Osiris 11: 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlot, Christine. 1989. ‹The Science of Saving Endangered Species.’ BioScience 39(2): 68–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Donald E, Smith, Roland. 1991. ‹The Red Wolf as a Model for Carnivore Re-Introductions.’ Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 62: 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowat, Farley. 1963. Never Cry Wolf. Boston:Little.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie, Adolph. 1944. “The Wolves of Mount McKinley”. In Fauna of the National Parks of the United States Fauna series no. 5. Washington, D.C.: G.P.O. Available online: http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS47781 (Last accessed December 3, 2008).

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 1967. ‹The Red Wolf in Louisiana.’ Defenders of Wildlife News 42(1): 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 1970. ‹Report on the Red Wolf.’ Defenders of Wildlife News 45(1): 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 1972. “The Mysterious Wolf of the South”. Natural History: The Journal of the American Museum of Natural History. 81(1): 50–53, 74–77.

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 1974. ‹Red Wolf: Our Most Endangered Mammal – The Rare Red Wolf is Endangered by Hybridization With Coyotes.’ National Parks and Conservation Magazine 48(8): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 1979. North American Quaternary Canis, Monograph of the Museum of Natural History, The University of Kansas. Lawrence:Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 1995. ‹Hybridization: The Double-Edged Threat.’ IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group Canid News 3: 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, Ronald M. 2002. ‹The Original Status of Wolves in Eastern North America.’ Southeastern Naturalist 1(2): 95–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, Ronald M, Federoff, NE, et al. 1998. ‹Validity of the Red Wolf: Response to Roy.’ Conservation Biology 12(3): 722–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Warren T. 1989. An Overview and Guide for “Experimental Population” Designations, Unpublished Report. United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Petersen, Shannon. 2002. Acting for Endangered Species: The Statutory Ark. Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Michael K. 1989. ‹Born in the Wild.’ Wildlife in North Carolina 53(9): 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Michael K. 1995. Conserving the Red Wolf. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group Canid News 3. Available online: http://www.canids.org/PUBLICAT/CNDNEWS3/consredw.htm (Last accessed December 3, 2008).

  • Phillips, Michael K, Henry, V Gary, Kelly, Brian T. 2003. ‹Restoration of the Red Wolf.’ LD Mech, L Boitani (eds.), Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, William S. 1973. ‹Creatures of North Carolina from Roanoke Island to Purgatory Mountain.’ North Carolina Historical Review 50(2): 121–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, James A. 1999. Preserving Yellowstone’s Natural Conditions: Science and the Perception of Nature. Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, David B. 1967. The Roanoke voyages, 1584–90. Vol. I. [Nendeln, Liechtenstein]: Kraus Reprint.

  • Rennie, John. 1991. “Howls of Dismay”. Scientific American (October): 18–20.

  • Richardson, Curtis J, Matthews, Mary L, Anderson, Stephen A. 1981. Pocosin Wetlands: An Integrated Analysis of Coastal Plain Freshwater Bogs in North Carolina. Stroudsburg, PA:Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Edmund. 2003. ‹Evolutionary History: Prospectus for a New Field.’ Environmental History 8(2): 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Edmund. 2004. ‹The Garden in the Machine: Toward an Evolutionary History of Technology.’ Scranton Philip, Susan R Schrepfer (eds.), Industrializing Organisms: Introducing Evolutionary History. New York, NY:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, Bruce J. 1991. From Cotton Belt to Sunbelt: Federal Policy, Economic Development, and the Transformation of the South, 1938–1980. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Richard West. 1997. Preserving Nature in the National Parks: A History. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, James H. 1975. Ecology, Behavior and Systematics of the Red Wolf (Canis rufus). Ph.D. diss., Yale University.

  • Silver, Timothy. 1990. A New Face on the Countryside: Indians, Colonists, and Slaves in South Atlantic Forests, 1500–1800. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Douglas W, Ferguson, Gary. 2005. Decade of the Wolf: Returning the Wild to Yellowstone. Guilford, CT:Lyons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Noel F R, Derrickson, Scott R, Beissinger, Steven R, Wiley, James W, Smith, Thomas B, Toone, William D, Miller, Brian. 1996. ‹Limitations of Captive Breeding in Endangered Species Recovery.’ Conservation Biology 10(2): 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, Paul. 2002. Driven Wild: How the Fight Against Automobiles Launched the Modern Wilderness Movement. Seattle:University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Mark. 1987. ‹Coyotes Come to Carolina.’ Wildlife in North Carolina 51(10): 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Joseph E. 1999. Making Salmon: An Environmental History of the Northwest Fisheries Crisis. Seattle:University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venters, Vic. 1989. ‹Return of the Red Wolf.’ Wildlife in North Carolina 53(9): 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venters, Vic. 1991. “Experimental Reintroduction Project Underway: Great Smoky Mountains National Park Gets Red Wolves.” Wildlife in North Carolina (April): 25.

  • Walker, Brett L. 2005. The Lost Wolves of Japan. Seattle:University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, Albert G. 2006. ‹Burned to Be Wild: Herbert Stoddard and the Roots of Ecological Conservation in the Southern Longleaf Pine Forest.’ Environmental History 11(3): 500–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, Robert K, Gittleman, John L. 1995. ‹The Problematic Red Wolf.’ Scientific American 273(1): 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, Robert K, Vila, Charles. 2003. ‹Molecular Genetic Studies of Wolves.’ LD Mech, L Boitani (eds.), Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, David S, McMillan, Margaret. 2006. ‹The Class of ‹67.’ D Goble, JM Scott, FW Davis (eds.), The Endangered Species Act at Thirty, vol I. Washington, DC:Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Stanley Paul, Goldman, Edward Alphonso 1944. The Wolves of North America. Part II: Classification of Wolves, 1st ed. Washington, DC:The American Wildlife Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Christopher J. Manganiello

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Manganiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Manganiello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manganiello, C.J. From a Howling Wilderness to Howling Safaris: Science, Policy and Red Wolves in the American South. J Hist Biol 42, 325–359 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9176-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9176-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation