Skip to main content
Log in

Radiobiology in the Atomic Age: Changing Research Practices and Policies in Comparative Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay introduces a special collection of papers by Angela Creager, Soraya de Chadarevian, Karen Rader, Jean-Paul Gaudillière, and María Jesús Santesmases on the theme “Radiobiology in the Atomic Age.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abir-Am Pnina G. (1982) “The Discourse of Physical Power and Biological Knowledge in the 1930s: A Reappraisal of the Rockefeller Foundation’s ‚Policy’ in Molecular Biology.” Social Studies of Science 12:341–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty John. (1991) “Genetics in the Atomic Age: The Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, 1947–1956.” In: Keith R. Benson, Jane Maienschein and Ronald Rainger (eds.), The Expansion of American Biology. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ pp. 284–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocking Stephen (1995) “Ecosystems, Ecologists, and the Atom: Environmental Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.” Journal of the History of Biology 28:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocking Stephen. (1997) Ecologists and Environmental Politics: A History of Contemporary Ecology. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chadarevian Soraya. (2002) Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel Ronald E. (1997) “Scientists as Policymakers, Advisors, and Intelligence Agents: Linking Contemporary Diplomatic History with the History of Contemporary Science”. In: Thoma Söderqvist (ed.), The Historiography of Contemporary Science and Technology. Harwood: Amsterdam pp. 215–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans Robley D. (1946) “The Medical Uses of Atomic Energy.” Atlantic 177 (Jan. 1946):68–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman Paul. (1987) “Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Basis for Physical Research in the United States, 1940–1960.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 18:149–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragu Philippe. (2003) “How the Field of Thyroid Endocrinology Developed in France after World War II.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 77:393–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière Jean-Paul. (2002) Inventer la biomédecine: La France, l’Amérique et la production des saviors du vivant (1945–1965). éditions la Découverte: Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul and Löwy, Ilana, eds. 1998. The Invisible Industrialist: Manufactures and the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Macmillan: London

  • Gowing Margaret (1974) Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy, 1945–1952, 2 vols. Macmillan:London

  • Hacker Barton C. (1994) Elements of Controversy: The Atomic Energy Commission and Radiation Safety in Nuclear Weapons Testing, 1947–1974. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht Gabrielle. (2002) “Rupture-Talk in the Nuclear Age: Conjugating Colonial Power in Africa.” Social Studies of Science 32:691–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, Richard G. and Duncan, Francis. 1990 (1969). Atomic Shield: A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Volume II 1947–1952. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; originally published: University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press

  • Hollaender, Alexander. 1963. “Acceptance Speech.” Michael Ebert and Alma Howard (eds.), Radiation Effects in Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, pp. vii–x

  • Jolly, J. Christopher. 2003. “Thresholds of Uncertainty: Radiation and Responsibility in the Fallout Controversy.” Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University

  • Josephson Paul. (2000) Red Atom: Russia’s Nuclear Power Program from Stalin to Today. W. H. Freeman :New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser David. (2005) Training and the Generalist’s Vision in the History of Science. Isis 96:244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay Lily E. 1993 The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. Oxford University Press:New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller Evelyn Fox. (1990) “Physics and the Emergence of Molecular Biology: A History of Cognitive and Political Synergy.” Journal of the History of Biology 23:389–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller Evelyn Fox. (1992) “From Secrets of Life to Secrets of Death.” In Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender, and Science. Routledge: New York pp. 39–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles Daniel J. (1990) “Cold War and Hot Physics: Science, Security, and the American State, 1945–56” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 20:239–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. and Geison, Gerald L. 1995. “The Experimental Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century.” Osiris 10: 97–121, 233–241

  • Kohler Robert E. 1991. Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945. University of Chicago Press:Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft Alison. (2006) “Between Medicine and Industry: Medical Physics and the Rise of the Radioisotopes 1945–65.” Contemporary British History 20:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krige John. (2006) “Atoms for Peace, Scientific Internationalism and Scientific Intelligence.” Osiris 21:161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, Timothy and Hays, Marguerite. 2000. “The Manhattan Project for Biomedicine.” Philip R. Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies: Historical, Philosophical, Ethical, and Theological Perspectives on the Human Genome Project. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 29–62

  • Lindee Susan M. (1994) Suffering Made Real: American Science and the Survivors at Hiroshima. University of Chicago Press:Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller H.J. (1927) “Artificial Transmutation of the Gene.” Science 66:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rader Karen A. (2004) Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955 Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen Nicolas. (1997) “The Mid-Century Biophysics Bubble: Hiroshima and the Biological Revolution in America, Revisited.” History of Science 35:245–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2002. “Les Sciences de la Vie a l’Age Atomique. Identités, pratiques et alliances dans la construction de la biologie moléculaire á Genève (1945–1970),” Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Genève, Université de Paris 7

  • U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 1952. Some Applications of Atomic Energy in Plant Science. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela N. H. Creager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Creager, A.N.H., Santesmases, M.J. Radiobiology in the Atomic Age: Changing Research Practices and Policies in Comparative Perspective. J Hist Biol 39, 637–647 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-006-9107-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-006-9107-3

Keywords

Navigation