Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preventive health care is unlike health care for acute ailments, as people are less alert to their unknown medical problems. In order to motivate public and to attain desired participation levels for preventive programs, the attractiveness of the health care facility is a major concern. Health economics literature indicates that attractiveness of a facility is significantly influenced by proximity of the clients to it. Hence attractiveness is generally modelled as a function of distance. However, abundant empirical evidence suggests that other qualitative factors such as perceived quality, attractions nearby, amenities, etc. also influence attractiveness. Therefore, a realistic measure should incorporate the vagueness in the concept of attractiveness to the model. The public policy makers should also maintain the equity among various neighborhoods, which should be considered as a second objective. Finally, even though the general tendency in the literature is to focus on health benefits, the cost effectiveness is still a factor that should be considered. In this paper, a fuzzy bi-objective model with budget constraints is developed. Later, by modelling the attractiveness by means of fuzzy triangular numbers and treating the budget constraint as a soft constraint, a modified (and more realistic) version of the model is introduced. Two solution methodologies, namely fuzzy goal programming and fuzzy chance constrained optimization are proposed as solutions. Both the original and the modified models are solved within the framework of a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. In the case study, the Microsoft Bing Map is utilized in order to determine more accurate distance measures among the nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Augmented 𝜖-constraint method.

  2. Application Programming Interface.

References

  1. Alumur S, Kara BY (2007) A new model for the hazardous waste location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1406–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Batta R, Lejeune M, Prasad S (2014) Public facility location using dispersion, population, and equity criteria. Eur J Oper Res 234(3):819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beliën J, Boeck LD, Colpaert J, Devesse S, den Bossche FV (2013) Optimizing the facility location design of organ transplant centers. Decis Support Syst 54(4):1568–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biørn E, Godager G (2010) Does quality influence choice of general practitioner? an analysis of matched doctor-patient panel data. Econ Model 27(4):842–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Capps CS, Schut FT (2008) Defining hospital markets for antitrust enforcement: new approaches and their applicability to the netherlands. Health Econ Policy Law 3:7–29

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charnes A, Clower R, Kortanek K (1967) Effective control through coherent decentralization with preemptive goals. Econometrica: J Econ Soc 35(2):294–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO (1955) Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manag Sci 1(2):138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Niehaus R (1967) A goal programming model for manpower planning. Tech. rep., DTIC Document

  9. Cocking C, Flessa S, Reinelt G (2012) Improving access to health facilities in nouna district, burkina faso. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 46(2):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC (2008) Does preventive care save money? health economics and the presidential candidates. New England J Med 358(7):661–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Turkey life science and healthcare report. http://www.yased.org.tr (2012). Online accessed 27 May 2014. Deloitte

  12. Feng T, Timmermans HJ (2014) Trade-offs between mobility and equity maximization under environmental capacity constraints: A case study of an integrated multi-objective model. In: Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

  13. Galvao RD, Espejo LGA, Boffey B (2002) A hierarchical model for the location of perinatal facilities in the municipality of rio de janeiro. Eur J Oper Res 138(3):495–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldman D, Romley JA (2008) Hospitals as hotels: the role of patient amenities in hospital demand. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

  15. Gravelle HS, Propper C, Santos R (2013) Does quality affect patients? choice of doctor? evidence from the uk. Tech. rep., C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

  16. Gu W, Wang X, McGregor SE (2010) Optimization of preventive health care facility locations. Int J Health Geogr 9(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gunes ED, Yaman H, Cekyay B, Verter V (2014) Matching patient and physician preferences. J Oper Res Soc 65(4):483–496

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haimes YY, Lasdon LS, Wismer DA (1971) On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1(3):296–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hakimi SL (1964) Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Oper Res 12(3):450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haynes R, Lovett A, Sunnenberg G (2003) Potential accessibility, travel time, and consumer choice: geographical variations in general medical practice registrations in eastern england. Environ Plan A 35(10):1733–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holland WW (2005) Screening in disease prevention: what works? Radcliffe Publishing

  22. Hwang CL, Masud ASM (1979) Multiple objective decision making-methods and applications, lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 164. Springer

  23. Liu B (2004) Uncertainty theory: an introduction to its axiomatic foundations, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 154. Springer

  24. Liu B (2009) Theory and practice of uncertain programming, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 239. Springer Verlag

  25. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Edwards NM, Solberg LI (2010) Greater use of preventive services in us health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Aff 29(9):1656–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C, Byers AH (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Tech. rep. McKinsey Global Institute

  27. Masud AS, Hwang CL (1981) Interactive sequential goal programming. J Oper Res Soc 32(5):391–400

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mavrotas G (2009) Effective implementation of the epsillon-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput 213(2):455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Müller I, Smith T, Mellor S, Rare L, Genton B (1998) The effect of distance from home on attendance at a small rural health centre in papua new guinea. Int J Epidemiol 27(5):878–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ndiaye M, Alfares H (2008) Modeling health care facility location for moving population groups. Comput Oper Res 35(7):2154–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ozkok BA, Tiryaki F (2011) A compensatory fuzzy approach to multi-objective linear supplier selection problem with multiple-item. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):11,363–11,368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Parker BR, Srinivasan V (1976) A consumer preference approach to the planning of rural primary health-care facilities. Oper Res 24(5):991–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Savas BS, Karahan O, Saka RO Health care systems in transition. http://www.euro.who.int (2002). Online accessed 27 May 2014

  34. Schwartz M (2012) Health care quality, access, cost, workforce, and surgical education: the ultimate perfect storm. J Pediatr Surg 47(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shariat-Mohayman A, Babaei M, Moadi S, Amiripour SM (2012) Linear upper-bound unavailability set covering models for locating ambulances: application to tehran rural roads. Eur J Oper Res 221(1):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shariff SS, Moin NH, Omar M (2012) Location allocation modeling for healthcare facility planning in malaysia. Comput Ind Eng 62(4):1000–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsou KW, Hung YT, Chang YL (2005) An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities 22(6):424–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. TUIK Number of beds in public and private in-patient institutions. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr (2012). Online accessed 27 May 2014

  39. TurkishMinistryofHealth Activity report 2013. http://www.sgb.saglik.gov.tr (2013). Online accessed 27 May 2014

  40. Varkevisser M, van der Geest SA, Schut FT (2012) Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the netherlands. J Health Econ 31(2):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Verter V, Lapierre SD (2002) Location of preventive health care facilities. Ann Oper Res 110(1–4):123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Werners BM (1988) Aggregation models in mathematical programming. Math Models Decis Support 48:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. WHO five years of progress in global tobacco control. http://www.who.int (2013). Online accessed 27 May 2014

  44. Woolf SH, Husten CG, Lewin LS, Marks J, Fielding J, Sanchez E (2009) The economic argument for disease prevention: distinguishing between value and savings. Partnership for prevention

  45. Zadeh L (1999) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100 Supplement 1:9–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8 (3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Berman O, Marcotte P, Verter V (2010) A bilevel model for preventive healthcare facility network design with congestion. IIE Trans 42(12):865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V. (2009) Incorporating congestion in preventive healthcare facility network design. Eur J Oper Res 198(3):922–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V (2012) The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design. OR Spectrum 34(2):349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zimmermann H. (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Soheil Davari, Kemal Kilic & Gurdal Ertek

Authors
  1. Soheil Davari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kemal Kilic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gurdal Ertek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheil Davari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davari, S., Kilic, K. & Ertek, G. Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design. Health Care Manag Sci 18, 303–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-014-9293-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-014-9293-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation