Skip to main content
Log in

Linking places to problems: geospatial theories of neighborhoods, alcohol and crime

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a critical review of two broad categories of social ecological theories of crime, social integration and place-based theories, and their relationships to spatial assessments of crime patterns. Social integration theories emphasize the role of neighborhood disorganization on crime, while place-based theories stress the social interactions within and between places as a source of crime. We provide an analysis of the extent to which these two types of theorizing describe processes and mechanisms that are truly ecologic (identify specific interactions between individuals and their environments) and truly spatial (identify specific movement and interaction patterns of individuals and groups) as they endeavor to explain crime outcomes. We suggest that social integration theories do not provide spatial signatures of sufficient specificity to justify the application of spatial statistical techniques as quantitative arbiters of the theory. On the other hand, place based theories go some way toward addressing these issues because the emphasis is placed on understanding the exact physical and social characteristics of place and the activities that occur around locations as sources of crime. Routine activities and crime potential theories attempt to explain clustering or “hot spots” of crime in ways that give clear spatial dimension by looking at micro-spatial interactions between offenders and targets of crime. These theories have strong ecological implications as well, since they contain specific statements about how people use the space around them and how these patterns of use are related to patterns of criminal activity. We conclude by identifying a set of requirements for successful empirical tests of geospatial theories, including the development of valid measures of key theoretical constructs and the formulation of critical empirical assessments of geospatial hypotheses derived from motivating theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L., Cohen, J., Cook, D., Gorr, W., & Tita, G. (2000). Spatial analyses of crime. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 4. Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 213–262). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banjeree, A., LaScala, E., Gruenewald, P. J., Freisthler, B., & Treno, A. (2008). Social disorganization, alcohol, and drug markets and violence: A space-time model of community structure. In Y. F. Thomas (Ed.), Geography and drug addiction (pp. 119–132). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. L., & Block, C. R. (1995). Space, place and crime: Hot spot areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 145–183). Monsey, NY: Crimnal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. E., & Wiles, P. (1997). Environmental criminology. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 305–359). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths, and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R. J. Jr. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (1993). Routine activity and rational choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (1987). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology, 25(4), 911–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freisthler, B. (2004). A spatial analysis of social disorganization, alcohol access and rates of child maltreatment in neighborhoods. Child and Youth Services Review, 26(12), 803–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. P. (1994). The ecology of aggression. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, D. M., Speer, P. W., Gruenewald, P. G., & Labouvie, E. W. (2001). Spatial dynamics of alcohol availability, neighborhood structure and violent crime. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(5), 628–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, P. G. (2007). The spatial ecology of alcohol problems: Niche theory and assertive drinking. Addiction, 102(6), 870–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, P. G. (2008). Why do alcohol outlets matter anyway? A look into the future. Addiction, 103(10), 1585–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, P. J., Freisthler, B., Remer, L., LaScala, E. A., & Treno, A. (2006). Ecological models of alcohol outlets and violent assaults: Crime potentials and geospatial analysis. Addiction, 101(5), 666–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, P. J., Millar, A. B., Ponicki, W. R., & Brinkley, G. (2000). Physical and economic access to alcohol: The application of geostatistical methods to small area analysis in community settings. In R. Wilson & M. Dufour (Eds.), Small area analysis and the epidemiology of alcohol problems, NIAAA research monograph. Rockville, MD: NIAAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, P. J., Millar, A. B., Treno, A. J., Yang, Z., Ponicki, W. R., & Roeper, P. (1996). The geography of availability and driving after drinking. Addiction, 91(7), 967–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kautt, P. M., & Roncek, D. W. (2007). Schools as criminal “hot spots”: Primary, secondary and beyond. Criminal Justice Review, 32(4), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In I. Kawachi & L. Berkman (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubirin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. B. (2008). Bayesian disease mapping: Hierarchical modeling in spatial epidemiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, R., Gorman, D. M., Wieczorek, W. F., & Gruenewald, P. G. (2003). The application of spatial analysis to the public health understanding of alcohol and alcohol-related problems. In O. A. Khan (Ed.), Geographic information systems and health applications. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, M., Chikritxhs, T., & Room, R. (2007). Changing the density of alcohol outlets to reduce alcohol-related problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26(5), 557–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Cullen, F. T., & Pratt, T. C. (2003). Replicating Sampson and Groves’s test of social disorganization theory: Revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. (1993). Alcohol and theories of homicide. In F. Adler & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 4, pp. 113–141). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H. (2006). A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(3), 261–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. G., Reid, S. E., Bhati, A. S., & Tereschchenko, B. (2008). Alcohol outlets as attractors of violence and disorder: A closer look at neighborhood environment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D. W., & Maier, P. A. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots”. Criminology, 29(4), 725–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1992). Family management and child development: Insights from social disorganization theory. In J. McCord (Ed.), Facts, frames, and forecasts (pp. 63–93). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1995). The community. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 193–216). San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2004). Neighborhood and community: Collective efficacy and community safety. New Economy, 11(2), 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2005). Social ecology and collective efficacy theory. In S. Henry & M. M. Lanier (Eds.), Essential criminology reader (pp. 132–140). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2006). Collective efficacy theory: Lessons learned and directions for future inquiry. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. Blevens (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 149–167). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. Criminology, 94(4), 774–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, R. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5339), 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, R., Theall, K. P., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Mason, K., Cohen, D., & Simonsen, N. (2007). Determinants of social capital indicators at the neighborhood level: A longitudinal analysis of loss of off-sale alcohol outlets and voting. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 68(6), 934–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. R. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (1987). Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology, 25(4), 893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, T., Gruenewald, P. J., Toumbourou, J., & Loxley, W. (2005). Preventing harmful substance use: The evidence base for policy and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B. (2002). Fear of crime, local social ties, and collective efficacy: Maybe masquerading measurement, maybe deja vu all over again. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theall, K. P., Scribner, R., Cohen, D., Bluthenthal, R. N., Schonlau, M., & Farley, T. A. (2009a). Social capital and neighborhood alcohol environment. Health and Place, 15(1), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theall, K. P., Scribner, R., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Cohen, D., Mason, K., & Simonsen, N. (2009b). Neighborhood alcohol availability and gonorrhea rates: Impact of social capital. Geospatial Health, 3(2), 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tita, G., & Griffith, E. (2005). Travelling to violence: The case for a mobility-based spatial topology of homicide. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(3), 275–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Mazerolle, L. G. (2000). Crime and disorder in drug hot spots: Implications for theory and practice in policing. Police Quarterly, 3(3), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis M. Gorman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorman, D.M., Gruenewald, P.J. & Waller, L.A. Linking places to problems: geospatial theories of neighborhoods, alcohol and crime. GeoJournal 78, 417–428 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9425-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9425-7

Keywords

Navigation