Skip to main content
Log in

Geotechnical Assessment of Crushed Shales from Selected Locations in Nigeria as Materials for Landfill Liners

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crushed shales obtained from two locations (Ahoko, Bida basin and Ifon, Dahomey basin) in Nigeria were evaluated to determine their suitability as compacted landfill liners. The shale samples were subjected to X-ray diffraction, hydraulic conductivity, classification, compaction, consolidation and cation exchange capacity tests. The result of the XRD revealed kaolinite and illite as the major clay minerals while quartz was the dominant non-clay minerals. The average CEC of Ifon and Ahoko shales was 5.37 and 8.34 mEq/100 g, respectively. The liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of crushed Ifon shales ranged from (33.9 to 37.4%), (25.2 to 27.2%) and (8.6 to 10.2%) while the Ahoko shales ranged from (44 to 46.4%), (26.3 to 27.4%) and (16.6 to 19.6%), respectively. In addition, the estimated activity of the clay fractions of the two shales ranged from 0.41 to 0.51, suggesting inactive clays. The compacted shales have low compressibility and when compacted at modified Proctor level of compaction. At molding water content between optimum moisture content (OMC) ±2%, the hydraulic conductivities of the compacted shale were in the order of 10−6–10−7 cm/s when compacted at modified Proctor level. At OMC, hydraulic conductivities of the compacted shales were in the order of 10−7 cm/s when exposed to different concentration of calcium chloride solutions. Overall, the crushed shale samples from Ahoko and Ifon generally fulfilled the basic geotechnical properties for compacted clay liners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abichou T, Benson CH, Edil TB, Tawfiq K (2004) Hydraulic conductivity of foundry sands and their use as hydraulic barriers. In: Aydilek AH, Wartman J (eds) Recycled materials in geotechnics. Geotechnical Special Publication 127, ASCE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeleye DR (1974) Sedimentology of the fluvial Bida Sandstone (Cretaceous), Nigeria. Sediment Geol 12:1–24. doi:10.1016/0037-0738(74)90013-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluko OO, Sridhar MKC, Oluwande PA (2003) Characterization of leachates from a municipal solid waste landfill site in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Environ Heal Res 2:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameratunga J, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2016) Correlations of soil and rock properties in geotechnical engineering. Developments in geotechnical engineering. Springer, New Delhi

  • Arasan S (2010) Effect of chemicals on geotechnical properties of clay liners: a review. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 2:765–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Arasan S, Yetimoǧlu T (2008) Effect of inorganic salt solutions on the consistency limits of two clays. Turkish J Eng Environ Sci 32:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D1557 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D5856 (2007) Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of porous materials using a rigid-wall compaction-mold permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D698 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell FG (2000) Engineering properties of soils and rocks, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson CH, Hardianto FS, Motan SE (1994) Representative specimen size for hydraulic conductivity assessment of compacted soil liners. In: Daniel DE, Trautwein SJ (eds) Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil. ASTM STP 1142, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelpia

    Google Scholar 

  • Blotz LR, Benson CH, Boutwell GP (1998) Estimating optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight for compacted clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(9):907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Standard 1377 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. British Standard Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick GP, Daniel DE (1990) Stabilizing compacted clay against chemical attack. J Geotech Eng 116:1549–1567. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:10(1549)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budhu M (2015) Soil mechanics fundamentals. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos P, Madejón E, Pérez-de-Mora A, Cabrera F (2008) Horizontal and vertical variability of soil properties in a trace element contaminated area. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 10:11–25. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2007.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra R, Pleysier J, Cremers A (1975) The measurement of the cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in soils: a new method. In: Proceedings of the International Clay Conference, Wilmette, Illinois, pp 439–449

  • Daniel DE, Benson CH (1990) Water content-density criteria for compacted soil liners. J Geotech Eng 116:1811–1830. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:12(1811)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elueze AA (2000) Compositional appraisal and petrotectonic significance of the Imelu banded ferruginous rock in the Ilesha schist belt, southwestern Nigeria. J Min Geol 36(1):8–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisca FM, Glatstein DA (2010) Long term hydraulic conductivity of compacted soils permeated with landfill leachate. Appl Clay Sci 49:187–193. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2010.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M, Huebner P, Kmet P (1990) An evaluation of the performance of four clay lined landfills in Wisconsin. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual waste conference. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, pp 399–460

  • Guney Y, Koparal S, Aydilek AH (2008) Sepiolite as an alternative liner material in municipal solid waste landfills. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(8):1166–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdi N, Srasra E (2013) Hydraulic conductivity study of compacted clay soils used as landfill liners for an acidic waste. Waste Manag 33:60–66. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Wang Y, Li Y, Ruan X (2015) Effects of leachate infiltration and desiccation cracks on hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay. Water Sci Eng 8:151–157. doi:10.1016/j.wse.2015.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali K (1997) Engineering aspects of a novel landfill liner material: bentonite-amended natural zeolite. Eng Geol 46:105–114. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(96)00102-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabalı K, Mollamahmutoğlu M (2000) The influence of hazardous liquid waste on the permeability of earthen liners. Environ Geol 39:201–210. doi:10.1007/s002540050001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Baun A, Ledin A, Christensen TH (2002) Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 32:297–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch D (2002) Bentonites as a basic material for technical base liners and site encapsulation cut-off walls. Appl Clay Sci 21:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogbe CA (1976) The Cretaceous and Palcogene sediments of southern Nigeria. In: Kogbe CA (ed) Geology of Nigeria. Elizabcthun, Sydney, pp 273–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design, Report EL-6800. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Xue Q, Wang P, Liu L (2013) Influence of leachate pollution on mechanical properties of compacted clay: a case study on behaviors and mechanisms. Eng Geol 167:128–133. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HL, Zhu CP, Zhang XL (2008) Fundamental physical properties of soil polluted by acid and alkali in laboratory. Chin J Geotech Eng 30(8):1213–1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Łuczak-Wilamowska B (2002) Neogene clays from Poland as mineral sealing barriers for landfills: experimental study. Appl Clay Sci 21:33–43. doi:10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00090-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malusis MA, Shackelford CD (2002) Theory for reactive solute transport through clay membrane barriers. J Contam Hydrol 59:291–316. doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00041-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Met İ, Akgün H (2015) Geotechnical evaluation of Ankara clay as a compacted clay liner. Environ Earth Sci 74:2991–3006. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4330-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamedzein YE-A, Al-Rawas AA, Al-Aghbari MY et al (2005) Assessment of crushed shales for use as compacted landfill liners. Eng Geol 80:271–281. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JD, Chao KC, Overton DD, Nelson EJ (2015) Foundation engineering for expansive soils, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrike SE, Osadebe CC, Omoniyi SS (2009) Geotechnical analysis of two Nigerian soils for use as clay liners. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:417–419. doi:10.1007/s10064-009-0189-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojo OJ, Akande SO (2009) Sedimentology and depositional environments of the Maastrichtian Patti Formation, southeastern Bida basin, Nigeria. Cretac Res 30:1415–1425. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2009.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojoawo SO (2012) Characterization of dumpsite leachate: case study of Ogbomosoland, South-Western Nigeria. Open J Civ Eng 02:33–41. doi:10.4236/ojce.2012.21006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oweis IS, Khera RP (1990) Geotechnology of waste management. Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., University Press, Cambridge

  • Oztoprak S, Pisirici B (2011) Effects of micro structure changes on the macro behaviour of Istanbul (Turkey) clays exposed to landfill leachate. Eng Geol 121:110–122. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Vipulanandan C, Kim J, Oh M (2006) Effects of surfactants and electrolyte solutions on the properties of soil. Environ Geol 49:977–989. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-0136-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian X, Koerner RM, Gray DH (2002) Geotechnical aspects of landfill design and construction. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman F (2000) Hydraulic conductivity and chemical compatibility of some victorian soils used as liners for waste containment, Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University of Technology Melbourne, Australia, p 365

  • Rowe RK (2010) Systems engineering the design and operation of municipal solid waste landfills to minimize contamination of ground water. In: Chen Y, Zhan L, Tang X (eds) Advances in environmental geotechnics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK, Quigley RM, Brachman RWI, Booker JR (2004) Barrier systems for waste disposal facilities, 2nd edn. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shariatmadari N, Salami M, Fard MK (2011) Effect of inorganic salt solutions on some geotechnical properties of soil–bentonite mixtures as barriers. Int J Civ Eng 9(2):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HD, Reddy KR (2004) Geoenvironmental engineering: Site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste management technologies. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha MR, Kabir MH (2003) Sedimentary residual soils as a hydraulic barrier in waste containment systems. In: Second international conference on advances in soft soil engineering technology, Putrajaya, Malaysia, pp 895–904

  • Tijani MN, Bolaji OP (2007) Sorption and engineering characteristics of some clay/shale deposits from Nigeria as landfill liner. In: International meeting, clays in natural and engineered barriers for radioactive waste confinement, Lille, France, pp 376–378

  • Tijani MN, Adesina RB, Wagner J-F (2012) Geotechnical and geochemical assessments of shales in Anambra basin, SE-Nigeria as compacted clay liner in landfill system. Clays in natural and engineered barriers for radioactive waste confinement—5 International meeting Book of abstracts, p 923, France

  • Wesley LD (1988) Compression index: misleading parameter? J Geotech Eng 114:718–723. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:6(718)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlow R (2000) Basic soil mechanics, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Q, Zhang Q (2014) Effects of leachate concentration on the integrity of solidified clay liners. Waste Manag Res 32:198–206. doi:10.1177/0734242X14521679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz G, Yetimoglu T, Arasan S (2008) Hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay liners permeated with inorganic salt solutions. Waste Manag Res 26:464–473. doi:10.1177/0734242X08091586

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Edil T.B and the reviewers for the valuable comments and helpful suggestions during the paper review process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. O. Afolagboye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afolagboye, L.O., Talabi, A.O., Ajisafe, Y.C. et al. Geotechnical Assessment of Crushed Shales from Selected Locations in Nigeria as Materials for Landfill Liners. Geotech Geol Eng 35, 1847–1858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0213-0

Keywords

Navigation