Abstract
It is shown that the following three common understandings of Newton’s laws of motion do not hold for systems of infinitely many components. First, Newton’s third law, or the law of action and reaction, is universally believed to imply that the total sum of internal forces in a system is always zero. Several examples are presented to show that this belief fails to hold for infinite systems. Second, two of these examples are of an infinitely divisible continuous body with finite mass and volume such that the sum of all the internal forces in the body is not zero and the body accelerates due to this non-null net internal force. So the two examples also demonstrate the breakdown of the common understanding that according to Newton’s laws a body under no external force does not accelerate. Finally, these examples also make it clear that the expression ‘impressed force’ in Newton’s formulations of his first and second laws should be understood not as ‘external force’ but as ‘exerted force’ which is the sum of all the internal and external forces acting on a given body, if the body is infinitely divisible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, D., Johnson, P.: Nonconservation of energy and loss of determinism I: infinitely many colliding balls. Found. Phys. 39, 937–957 (2009)
Atkinson, D.: Losing energy in classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 38, 170–180 (2007)
Laraudogoitia, J.P.: A beautiful supertask. Mind 105, 81–83 (1996)
Atkinson, D., Johnson, P.: Nonconservation of energy and loss of determinism II: colliding with an open set. Found. Phys. 40, 179–189 (2010)
Laraudogoitia, J.P.: A flawed argument against actual infinity in physics. Found. Phys. 40, 1902–1910 (2010)
Newton, I.: The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University California Press, Berkeley (1999). Trans.: Cohen, I.B. and Whitman, A.
Lee, C.: Nonconservation of momentum in classical mechanics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 42, 68–73 (2011)
Saari, D., Xia, J.: Off to infinity in finite time. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 42, 538–546 (1995)
Norton, J.: Causation as folk science. Philos. Impr. 3, 4 (2003). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0003.004
Feynman, R., Leighton, R., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, Heat. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1964)
Goldstein, H.: Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1980)
Apostol, T.: Calculus, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1967)
Cooke, M.: Infinite sequences: finitist consequence. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 54, 591–599 (2003)
Wu, J., Ma, H., Zhou, M.: Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Childress, S.: An Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Mechanics. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2009)
Laraudogoitia, J.P.: Just as beautiful but not (necessarily) a supertask. Mind 111, 281–287 (2002)
Lanford, O.E.: Time evolution of large classical systems. In: Moser, J. (ed.) Dynamical Systems, Theory and Applications, pp. 1–111. Springer, New York (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, C. Infinity and Newton’s Three Laws of Motion. Found Phys 41, 1810–1828 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9580-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9580-1