Abstract
We present a new way of constructing classical analogies of quantum interference. These analogies share one common factor: they treat closed loops as fundamental entities. Such analogies can be used to understand the difference between quantum and classical probability; they can also be used to illuminate the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. An examination of these analogies suggests that closed loops (particularly closed loops in time) may have special significance in interpretations of quantum interference, because they allow probabilities to remain classically additive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Born, M.: Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Z. Phys. 37, 863 (1926)
Knight, P.: Quantum mechanics: where the weirdness comes from. Nature 395, 12 (1998)
de Broglie, L.: Philos. Mag. 47, 446 (1924)
Heisenberg, W.: Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Z. Phys. 43, 172 (1927)
Schrödinger, E.: Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935)
Ficek, Z., Swain, S.: Quantum Interference and Coherence. Springer, New York (2005)
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. III. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1965)
Kirkpatrick, K.A.: “Quantal” behavior in classical probability. Found. Phys. Lett. 16, 199 (2003)
Cohen, O.: Classical teleportation of classical states. Fluct. Noise Lett. 6, C1–C8 (2006)
Dragoman, D., Dragoman, M.: Quantum-Classical Analogies. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Rave, M.J.: Interpreting quantum interference using a Berry’s phase-like quantity. Found. Phys. 38, 1073 (2008)
Feynman, R.P.: Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948)
Hartle, J.B.: Quantum mechanics of individual systems. Am. J. Phys. 36, 704 (1968)
Dennett, D.C.: Intuition pumps. In: Brockman, J. (ed.) The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution. Simon & Schuster, New York (1995)
Wang, L.J., Zou, X.Y., Mandel, L.: Induced coherence without induced emission. Phys. Rev. A 44, 4614 (1991)
Forster, M.R.: Miraculous consilience of quantum mechanics. In: Eells, E., Fetzer, J.H. (eds.) The Place of Probability in Science. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Berry, M.V.: Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)
Zeh, H.D.: The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Everett, H. III: In: DeWitt, B.S., Graham, N. (eds.) The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1986)
Tegmark, M.: The interpretation of quantum mechanics: many worlds or many words? Fortschr. Phys. 46, 855 (1998)
Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)
Merli, P.G., Missiroli, G.F., Pozzi, G.: On the statistical aspect of electron interference phenomena. Am. J. Phys. 44, 306 (1976)
Schlosshauer, M.: Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267 (2004)
Schlosshauer, M.: Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rave, M.J. Quantum Interference and Many Worlds: A New Family of Classical Analogies. Found Phys 41, 1318–1330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9550-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9550-7