Using a single spin-1 object as an example, we discuss a recent approach to quantum entanglement. [A.A. Klyachko and A.S. Shumovsky, J. Phys: Conf. Series 36, 87 (2006), E-print quant-ph/0512213]. The key idea of the approach consists in presetting of basic observables in the very definition of quantum system. Specification of basic observables defines the dynamic symmetry of the system. Entangled states of the system are then interpreted as states with maximal amount of uncertainty of all basic observables. The approach gives purely physical picture of entanglement. In particular, it separates principle physical properties of entanglement from inessential. Within the model example under consideration, we show relativity of entanglement with respect to dynamic symmetry and argue existence of single-particle entanglement. A number of physical examples are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Marcikic, H. de Riedmatten, W. Tittel, and N. Gisin, Nature (London) 42, 509 (2003); A. Poppe, A. Fedrizzi, R. Ursin, H. R. Böhm, T. Lörunser, O. Maurhardt, M. Peev, M. Suda, C. Kurtsiefer, H. Weinfurter, T. Jennewein, and A. Zeilinger, Optics Express 12, 3865 (2004); J. Ouelette, Ind. Phys. 10, 22 (2004).
R. C. S. Spreeuw, Found. Phys. 28, 361 (1998); A. Zeilinger, Found. Phys. 29, 631 (1999); A. Cabello, Found. Phys. 35, 1927 (2005); Č. Brukner et al., Found. Phys. 35, 1909 (2005); D. P. DiVincenzo et al., Found. Phys. 33, 1629 (2003); K. Horodecki et al., Found. Phys. 35, 2027 (2005); D. I. Fivel, Found. Phys. 29, 561 (1999); H. A. Carteret et al., Found. Phys. 29, 527 (1999); D. Bruß et al., Found. Phys. 33, 1617 (2004); P. Schust et al., Found. Phys. 34, 99 (2004); G. Auletta, Found. Phys. 35, 787 (2005); J. Bub, Found. Phys. 35, 541 (2005); T. Krüger, Found. Phys. 30, 1869 (2000); F. Hulpke et al., Found. Phys. 36, 477 (2006); P. Holland, Found. Phys. 35, 177 (2005).
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935). Phys. Rev. 47: 777
Nielsen M.A., Chuang I.L. (2000). Quantum Computations and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, New York
Bell J.S. (1966). Rev. Mod. Phys. 38: 447
Klyachko A.A., Shumovsky A.S. (2006). J. Phys. Conf. Series 36, 87 E-print quant-ph/0512213.
Klyachko A.A., Shumovsky A.S. (2003). J. Opt. B: Quant. Semiclas. Opt. 5: S322
S. J. van Enk, Phys. Rev. A 67, 022303 (2003); Phys. Rev. A 72, 064306 (2005).
Barnum H., Knill E., Ortiz G., Somma R., Viola L. (2004). Phys. Rev. Lett. 92: 107902
Can M.A., Klyachko A.A., Shumovsky A.S. (2005). J. Opt. B: Quant. Semiclass. Opt. 7: L1
A. A. Klyachko, E-print quant-ph/0206012.
Barnum H., Knill E., Ortiz G., Viola L. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 68, 032308
Klyachko A.A. (2006). J. Phys.: Conf. Series 36: 87
A. A. Klyachko, in Physics and Theoretical Computer Science From Numbers and Languages to (Quantum) Cryptography Volume 7, J.-P. Gazeau, J. Ned́cetril, and B. Rovan, eds. NATO Security through Science Series: Information and Communication Security (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2007).
Peres A. (1995). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Bruß D. (2002). J. Math. Phys. 43: 4237
Miyake A. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 67: 012108
Can M.A., Klyachko A.A., Shumovsky A.S. (2002). Phys. Rev. A 66: 022111
O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, A. Ekert, M. Lewenstein, C. Macchiavello, and A. Sanpera A, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062305 (2002); H. F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. A 68, 032103 (2003); B.-Q. Jin and V. E. Korepin, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062314 (2004).
Sancho J.M.G., Huelga S.F. (2000). Phys. Rev. A 61: 042303
M. Hayashi, B.-S. Shi, A. Tomita, K. Matsumoto, Y. Tsuda, and Y.-K. Jiang, E-print quant-ph/0603254.
Klyachko A.A., Shumovsky A.S. (2004). J. Opt. B: Quant. Semicla. Opt. 6: S29
Hermann R. (1966). Lie Groups for Physicists. Benjamin, New York
Dür W., Vidal G., Cirac J.I. (2000). Phys. Rev. A 62: 062314
Verstraete F., Dehaene J., De Moor B. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 68: 012103
A. V. Burlakov, M. V. Chechova, O. A. Karabutova, D. N. Klyshko, and S. P. Kulik, Phys. Rev. A 60, R4209 (1999); H. Bechman-Pasquinucci and A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3313 (2000); D. Bruß and C. Macchiavello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127901 (2002).
Caves C.M., Milburn G.J. (2000). Opt. Commun. 179: 439
L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2279 (1994); C. C. Gerry, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4583 (1996); P. G. Kwiat and R. J. Hughes, Science, 289, 1431 (2000); A. Beige, B.-G. Englert, C. Kurtsifer, and H. Weinfurter, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, L407 (2002); Y. H. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 67, 040301 (2003).
J. M. Radcliffe, J. Phys. A: Math. General 4, 313 (1971): F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2211 (1972).
A. M. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1986); J. Peřina, Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991).
J. Hald, J. L. Sørensen, C. Schori, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. A 83, 1319 (1999); A. Sørensen, L. M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 409, 63 (2001); U. V. Poulsen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A 64, 013616 (2001); A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4431 (2001); L. K. Thomsen, S. Mancini, and H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. A 65, 061801 (2002); J. K. Stokton, J. M. Geremia, A. C. Doherty, and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. A 67, 022112 (2003); D. W. Berry and B. C. Sanders, J. Phys. A 38, L 205 (2005).
Rungta P., Bužek V., Caves C.M., Hillery M., Milburn G.J. (2001). Phys. Rev. A 64: 042315
Wigner E.P., Yanase M.M. (1963). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 19: 910
H. Araki and M. M. Yanase, Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960); F. J. Dyson and A. Leonard, J. Math. Phys. 8, 423 (1967); F. J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 8, 1538 (1967); E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 434 (1973); A. Uhlman, Comm. Math. Phys. 54, 21 (1977); M. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 050402 (2002); J. Řeháček and Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 127904 (2003); S.-L. Luo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 180403 (2003); P. Gibilisco and T. Isola, J. Math. Phys. 44, 3752 (2003); S.-L. Luo and Q. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032106 (2004).
Klyachko A.A., Öztop B., Shumovsky A.S. (2006). Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 124102
Concurrence as a measure of two-qubit entanglement has been introduced by W. K. Wooters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). For its generalization on an arbitrary bipartite state, see: P. Rungta, V. Bužek, C.M. Caves, M. Hillery, and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 042315 (2001); F. Minnert, M. Kuś, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167902 (2004).
Kitagawa M., Ueda M. (1993). Phys. Rev. A 47: 5138
Çakır Ö., Klyachko A.A., Shumovsky A.S. (2005). Phys. Rev. A 71: 034303
A. V. Burlakov, M. V. Chechova, O. A. Karabutova, D. N. Klyshko, and S. P. Kulik, Phys. Rev. A 60, R4209 (1999); M. B. Nasr, A. F. Abouraddy, M. C. Booth, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, M. C. Teich, U. Kempe, amd R. Wollescheensky, Phys. Rev. A 65, 023816 (2002); G. DiGiuseppe, M. Atature, M. Shaw, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, M. C. Teich, A. J. Miller, S. W. Nam, and J. M. Martinis, Phys. Rev. A 68, 063817 (2003); Y. I. Bogdanov, M. V. Chechova, S. P. Kulik, G. A. Maslennikov, A. A. Zhukov, C. H. Oh, and M. K. Tey Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230503 (2004); M. V. Chechova, L. A. Krivitsky, S. P. Kulik, and G. A. Maslennikov, Phys. Rev. A 70, 053801 (2004).
P. Wölfe, The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990).
J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (Wiley, New York, 1952); R. J. Blin-Stoyl, Nuclear and Particle Physics (Chapman & Hall, London, 1991).
Hamieh S. (2004). J. Phys.: Math. Gen. 37: L59
Cottingham N., Greenwood D.A. (1998). An Introduction to Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics. Cambridge University Press, New York
von Neumann J. (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Coffman V., Kundu J., Wootters N.K. (2000). Phys. Rev. A 61: 052306
Horodecki R., Horodecki P., Horodecki M. (1996). Phys. Lett. A 210: 377
Werner R.F. (1989). Phys. Rev. A 40: 4277
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Binicioǧlu, S., Can, M.A., Klyachko, A.A. et al. Entanglement of a Single Spin-1 Object: An Example of Ubiquitous Entanglement. Found Phys 37, 1253–1277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9149-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9149-1