Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systems and Beliefs

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systems thinking provides insights into how ideas interact and change, and constructivism is an example of this type of systemic approach. In the 1970s constructivism emphasised the development of mathematical and scientific ideas in children. Recently constructivist ideas are applied much more generally. Here I use this approach to consider beliefs and their role in conflicts and the conditions needed for reconciliation. If we look at Reality in terms of how we construct it as a human cognitive process, we recognise two things. First, that we cannot go beyond our senses and thoughts to what exists independently of us, and second, if we construct what we know we have to take responsibility for this. This inevitably focuses our thinking on the relation we have with the physical and social world, we are a part of the universe rather than apart from it. This paper argues that accepting and understanding these limits of human knowing together with our interconnectedness provide opportunities to understand conflicting positions. To resolve conflict, people with opposing viewpoints have to be prepared to understand each other. That is a challenge because our own reality plays a vital role in our lives, for everything from personal survival to social support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G., & Bateson, M. C. (1987). Angels fear: An investigation into the nature and meaning of the sacred. London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Journal. (2010). doi:10.1136/bmj.c696.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1960) The quest for certainty. New York: Capricorn. (Originally published 1929).

  • Dhont, K., Van Hiel, A., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation. Group Process. Intergroup Relat., 17(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2014). Info-computational constructivism and cognition. Constructivist Foundations, 9(2), 223–231.

  • Dooley, T. (2010). The construction of mathematical insight by pupils in whole-class conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.

  • Douven, I. (2011). Peirce on abduction. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Retrieved February 21, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/peirce.html.

  • Drudy, S., Gash, H., Lynch, K., Lavin, P., Moles, R., Lane, C., et al. (1991). Integrating equal opportunities in the curriculum of teacher education 1988–1991: TENET programme dissemination phase. Irish Educational Studies, 10, 271–289.

  • Evans, D. (2012). Risk intelligence: How to live with uncertainty. New York: Free Press.

  • Farzin, F., Hou, C., & Norcia, A. M. (2012). Piecing it together: Infants’ neural responses to face and object structure. Journal of Vision, 12(13), 6. doi:10.1167/12.13.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2011). A defence of constructionism: Philosophy as conceptual engineering. Metaphilosophy, 42(3), 282–304. http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/Welcome.html.

  • Gash, H., & Morgan, M. (1993). School-based modifications of children’s gender-related beliefs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D., Schulz, L., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. (2013). Retrieved February 21, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/31/northern-ireland-draft-proposals-published.

  • Helm, T. (2014). Extremist religion is at the root of 21st-century wars, says Tony Blair. The Guardian, 25(1), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., Parke, R. D., & Locke, V. O. (2003). Child psychology: A contemporary viewpoint. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (Ed.). (2009). Neoconstructivism: The new science of cognitive development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Laurenson, J. (2014). French boycott gender theory at school. Retrieved February 16, 2014, from http://dw.de/p/1B0Tp.

  • Maturana, H. R. (1988). The search for objectivity, or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 25–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1990). Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In W. Krohn, G. Küppers, & H. Nowotny (Eds.), Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution (pp. 12–35). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2013). Irish Times 12.12.13. The lessons of peace learned in the North may not be that easy to export.

  • Murphy, B. (2014). Dummett, M. (1925–2011). Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved February 11, 2014, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/dummett/.

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J.-L. (2013a). Topological structures of complex belief systems. Complexity, 19(1), 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J.-L. (2013b). Topological structures of complex belief systems (II): Textual materialization. Complexity, 19(2), 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegler, A. (2007). Is Glasersfeld’s constructivism a dangerous intellectual tendency? In R. Glanville & A. Riegler (Eds.), The importance of being Ernst (pp. 263–275). Echoraum: Vienna.

  • Riegler, A., & Douven, I. (2009). Extending the Hegselmann–Krause model III: From single beliefs to complex belief states. Episteme, 6(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, S., & Carson, R. The contradictions in the constructivism discourse. http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome14/rowlands.pdf.

  • Sexton, K. A., & Dugas, M. J. (2009). Defining distinct negative beliefs about uncertainty: Validating the factor structure of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. Psychological Assessment, 21, 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure. London: Routledge.

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York: G. Braziller.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1974). Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In C. D. Smock & E. von Glasersfeld (Eds.), Epistemology and education. Follow through publications (pp. 1–24). Athens.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh Gash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gash, H. Systems and Beliefs. Found Sci 21, 177–187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9411-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9411-5

Keywords

Navigation