Abstract
The author starts from the observation that citizenship and voluntarism are contested terms with diverse meanings. They have also been appropriated by politicians of various persuasions and imbued with meanings associated with ‘feel good’ factors that emphasize serving in a community. Therefore, voluntarism has the potential to continue the exclusion of minority groups, marginalized individuals and collective groupings at the expense of their citizenship rights, particularly those identified by Hannah Arendt as the ‘right to have rights’ that have been endorsed through public policy but today are being undermined by the ‘age of austerity’ in publicly funded welfare states. Against the background of the political context of UK, and the public rhetoric on the ‘Big Society’, the author examines whether citizenship discourses allied with voluntarism support a meaningful endorsement of altruistic solidarity or whether they endorse exploitative relationships under the guise of meeting the public needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H. (1956). On totalitarianism. London: Andre Deutsch.
Barker, H. (1986). Recapturing sisterhood: A critical look at “process” in feminist organisations and community action. Critical Social Policy, 16, 80–90.
Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philantrocapitalism: How the rich can save the world. London: Bloomsbury Press.
Bissio, R. (2011). After the fall: Time for a new deal, social watch report 2010. Accessed October 20, 2011 from http://www.socialwatch.org
Bradbury, H., Lichtenstein, B., Carroll, J., & Senge, P. (2007). Relational space: Creating a context for innovation in collaborative consortia. Scholar Works, University of Massachusetts Boston, College of Management Working Papers and Reports. University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston MASS.
Cameron, D., & Clegg, N. (2010). Building the big society. Accessed April 26, 2011 from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/building-big-society
Clark, J. (1994). The relationship between the state and the voluntary sector. Accessed July 21, 2012 from http://www.gdrc.org/ngo/state-ngo.html
Dominelli, L. (2006). Women and community action. Bristol: Policy Press.
Dominelli, L. (2010). Social work in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dominelli, L. (2012). Green social work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dominelli, L. (2013). Mind the gap: built infrastructures, sustainable caring relations and resilient communities in extreme weather events. Australian Social Work, 66(2), 204–217. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2012.708
Elhert, M. (2012). Buffering income loss due to unemployment: Family and welfare state influence on income after job loss in the United States and Western Germany. Social Science Research, 41(4), 843–860.
George, S. (2003). Globalizing rights? In M. J. Gibney (Ed.), Globalizing rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
George, S. (2008). ‘Talking telephone numbers’ in the Guardian, supplement on development, 22 November, p. 2.
Haq, G., Brown, D., & Hards, S. (2010). Older people and climate change: The case for better engagement. Stockholm: Stockholm University, SEI.
Knijn, T., & Ungerson, C. (1997). Introduction: Care work and gender in welfare regimes. In Social politics, fall (pp. 323–327).
Knowles, D. (2012). George Osbourne’s U-turn on Charitable tax relief is a blatant attempt to distract from Jeremy Hunt’s self-harm. The Daily Telegraph.
Limb, M. (2011). Experts warn public health reforms will lead to job losses and service fragmentation. British Medical Journal, 342, 417.
Lister, R. (2003). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. London: Palgrave.
Lorenz, W. (1994). Social work in a changing Europe. London: Routledge.
McKinnon, J. (2008). Exploring the nexus between social work and the environment. Australian Social Work, 61(3), 268–282.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, J. S. (1867). Utilitarianism. London: Longman and Green.
Molyneux, M. (2002). Social capital and gender silences: Lessons from Latin America. Development and Change, 33(2), 167–188.
Mott, A. (2004). Increasing space and influence through community organising and citizen monitoring: Experiences from the USA. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, Special Issue, New Democratic Spaces, 35(2), 91–112.
Netto, P. (2006). The challenges and opportunities of neo-liberalism: A Marxist perspective. Paper given at the IASSW Biannual Conference, Santiago de Chile, July.
Noddings, N. (2002a). Educating moral people: An caring alternative to character education. Williston, VT: Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N. (2002b). Starting at home: Caring and social policy. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
Owen, D. (1982). The Government of Victorian London (pp. 1855–1889).
Pickles, E. (2011). Action to boost support for voluntary sector and cut red tape for councils. Accessed April 26, 2011 fromhttp://www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/1885482
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Plummer, J. (2011). Analysis: sector budgets feel the squeeze, third sector. Accessed April 26, 2011 from http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/1060843/Analysis-Sector-budgets-feel-squeeze/
Rose, F. (2000). Coalitions across class divides. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. London: Routledge.
The Guardian Data Blog. (2011). Accessed April 14, 2012 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/feb/23/nhs-cuts-list
Warren, M. (2001). Dry bones rattling: Community building to revitalize American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Watt, N., & Ramesh, R. (2012). Health reforms could damage NHS, warns draft risk register. The Guardian. Accessed April 14, 2012 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/mar/27/health-reforms-damage-nhs-risk-register?CMP=twt_gu
Webb, S. (1918). Labour and the new social order. London: The Fabian Society.
Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dominelli, L. Citizenship and Voluntarism: A Meaningful Combination or the Basis for Exploitative Relationships?. Found Sci 21, 385–397 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9399-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9399-2