Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Multi-observable Approach to Address the Ill-Posed Nature of Inverse Fire Modeling Problems

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study considers the development and evaluation of a prototype inverse fire model (IFM) aimed at predicting the heat release rate of a compartment fire using smoke layer information gained from building environmental sensors. The proposed methodology consists in: performing a search for the unknown heat release rate (HRR) by performing hundreds of different zone model simulations; comparing model predictions to observation data and thereby formulating an error function; using an optimization technique to minimize the error function and thereby producing a best estimate of HRR. The prototype IFM algorithm uses a zone fire model called BRI2002 (developed by the Building Research Institute in Japan) in conjunction with a genetic algorithm for optimization. The IFM algorithm is here applied to a reduced-scale laboratory experiment consisting of steady, over-ventilated, fire conditions in a simple multi-compartment (three rooms) configuration. The IFM algorithm is applied using a multiple-variable formulation in which both the fire size and the fire compartment venting conditions are assumed unknown, and using a one-observable or a two-observable scheme providing information on either the smoke layer temperature or on both the smoke layer temperature and depth. This framework is of particular interest because in the case of a one-observable scheme, the inverse fire problem is ill-posed, i.e. the optimization problem features multiple solutions and may converge to incorrect predictions of the fire size. This study shows that the two-observable scheme provides a way to regularize the inverse fire modeling problem, i.e. a way to provide a unique fire size solution. Our tests indicate that IFM-based estimates of HRR have an accuracy of better than 40%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandel J, Beezley JD (2008) Morphing ensemble kalman filter. Tellus A 60:131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mandel J, Bennethum LS, Beezley JD, Coen JL, Douglas CC, Kim M, Vodacek A (2008) A wildland fire model with data assimilation. Math Comput Simul 79:584–606.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel J, Beezley JD, Kochanski AK (2011) Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF 3.3 and SFIRE 2011. Geosci Model Dev 4:591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rochoux MC, Delmotte B, Cuenot B, Ricci S, Trouvé A (2013) Regional-scale simulations of wildland fire spread informed by real-time flame front observations. Proc Combust Inst 34:2641–2647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rochoux MC, Emery C, Ricci S, Cuenot B, Trouvé A (2014) Towards predictive simulation of wildfire spread at regional scale using ensemble-based data assimilation to correct the fire front position. In: Fire safety science—proceedings. Eleventh international symposium, international association for fire safety science, (accepted for publication).

  6. Rochoux MC, Ricci S, Lucor D, Cuenot B, Trouvé A (2014) Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread. Part I: reduced-cost ensemble Kalman filter based on a polynomial chaos surrogate model for parameter estimation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:2951-2973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rochoux MC, Emery C, Ricci S, Cuenot B, Trouvé A (2015) Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread. Part II: ensemble Kalman filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:1721–1739.

  8. Rios O, Jahn W, Rein G (2014) Forecasting wind-driven wildfires using an inverse modelling approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:1491–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richards RF, Munk BN, Plumb OA (1997) Fire detection, location and heat release rate through inverse problem solution. Part I: theory. Fire Safety J 28:323–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richards RF, Ribail RT, Bakkom AW, Plumb OA (1997) Fire detection, location and heat release rate through inverse problem solution. Part II: experiment. Fire Safety J 28:351–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis WD, Forney GP (2001) Sensor-driven fire model version 1.1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report NISTIR 6705.

  12. Lee W-S, Lee S-K (2005) The estimation of fire location and heat release rate by using sequential inverse method. J Chin Soc Mech Eng 26:201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neviackas A, Trouvé A (2007) Sensor-driven inverse zone modeling of enclosure fire dynamics. In: SFPE Professional Development Conference and Exposition, Las Vegas.

  14. Leblanc M, Trouvé A (2009) Inverse zone modeling of enclosure fire dynamics. In: 6th U.S. Combustion Meeting, Ann Arbor.

  15. Koo S-H, Fraser-Mitchell J, Welch S (2010) Sensor-steered fire simulation. Fire Safety J 45:193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cowlard A, Jahn W, Abecassis-Empis C, Rein G, Torero JL (2010) Sensor assisted fire fighting. Fire Technol 46:719–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jahn W, Rein G, Torero JL (2011) Forecasting fire growth using an inverse zone modeling approach. Fire Safety J 46:81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jahn W, Rein G, Torero JL (2012) Forecasting fire dynamics using inverse computational fluid dynamics and tangent linearisation. Adv Eng Softw 47:114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Overholt KJ, Ezekoye OA (2012) Characterizing heat release rates using an inverse fire modeling technique. Fire Technol 48:893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beji T, Verstockt S, Van de Walle R, Merci B (2014) On the use of real-time video to forecast fire growth in enclosures. Fire Technol 50:1021–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka T, Yamada S (2004) BRI2002: two layer zone smoke transport model. Fire Sci Technol 23:1–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Houck CR, Joines JA, Kay MG (1995) A genetic algorithm for function optimization: a Matlab implementation, Report NCSU-IE TR 95-09, North Carolina State University. www.ise.ncsu.edu/mirage/GAToolBox/gaot/.

  23. Lautenberger C, Rein G, Fernandez-Pello C (2006) The application of a genetic algorithm to estimate material properties for fire modeling from bench-scale fire test data. Fire Safety J 41:204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rein G, Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello C, Torero JL, Urban DL (2006) Application of genetic algorithms and thermogravimetry to determine the kinetics of polyurethane foam in smoldering combustion. Combust Flame 146:95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. GNU Octave. http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/.

  26. National Fire Protection Association (2012). Standard for smoke control systems. In: NFPA 92, vol 92, pp 12–13.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnaud Trouvé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Price, M., Marshall, A. & Trouvé, A. A Multi-observable Approach to Address the Ill-Posed Nature of Inverse Fire Modeling Problems. Fire Technol 52, 1779–1797 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0541-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0541-7

Keywords

Navigation