Abstract
The recent decision of the House of Lords in Stack v. Dowden appears, at first sight, to endorse a new approach to the jointly owned family home. However, upon closer inspection, this proves to be something of an illusion: the new approach is remarkably similar to the traditional resulting trust in that it attaches more weight to financial payments than to other contributions. A further problem is that the disjunction between the reasoning of the judges and the actual result makes it a difficult decision to apply to future cases. This case-note will consider the legal and social issues raised by the case and will argue that it has the potential to disadvantage women who do not make an equal financial contribution to the purchase of the home.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur S., Lewis J., Maclean M., Finch S., Fitzgerald R. (2002) Settling Up: Making Financial Arrangements After Separation. National Centre for Social Research, London
Barlow A., Duncan S., James G., Park A. (2005) Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Burgoyne C., Clarke V., Reibstein J., Edmunds A. (2006) All My Worldly Goods I Share With You?’ Managing Money at the Transition to Heterosexual Marriage. The Sociological Review 54(4):619–637
Dewar J., (1998) Land, Law and the Family Home. In: Bright S., Dewar J. (eds) Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford, OUP, pp 327–355
Douglas G., Pearce J., Woodward H., (2007) Dealing with Property Issues on Cohabitation Breakdown. Family Law 37:36–42
Fawcett Society, “Wimbledon Pays Women Equally – But Will Gordon Brown?” (2007), available at http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk//index.asp?PageID=486
Haskey J. (2001) Cohabiting Couples in Great Britain: Accommodation Sharing, Tenure and Property Ownership. Population Trends 103:26–36
Kiernan K. (2004) Unmarried Cohabitation and Parenthood in Britain and France. Law and Policy 26(1):33–55
Lader, D., Short, S. & Gershuny, J., The Time Use Survey, 2005: How We Spend Our Time (Office for National Statistics, 2006), available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/time_use_2005.pdf
Moffat G. (2007) Work-life Balance and Employment Law: Cultural Change or Mission: Impossible?. In: Probert R. (ed) Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 135–158
Office for National Statistics, 2006 Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (2006), available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/ashe1006.pdf
Probert R. (2001) Trusts and the Modern Woman: Establishing an Interest in the Family Home. Child and Family Law Quarterly 13:275–286
Probert R. (2005) Land, Law and Ex-lovers. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 69:168–173
Ramos X. (2001) Domestic Work Time and Gender Differentials in Great Britain 1992–1998 International Journal of Manpower 26(3):265–295
Stewart A. (2007) Home or Home: Caring About and For Elderly Family Members in a Welfare State. In: Probert R. (ed.) Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 159–177
Summerfield, C. & Babb, P. (eds.), Social Trends 33 (London: T.S.O, 2003)
Tennant, R., Taylor, J. & Lewis, J., Separating From Cohabitation: Making Arrangements for Finances and Parenting (London: DCA Research Series 7/06, 2006)
Vogler C., Brockmann M., Wiggins R. (2006) Intimate Relationships and Changing Patterns of Money Management at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century. The British Journal of Sociology 57(3):455–482
Wilson J. (2006) Tripping Up on the TR1. Family Law 36:305–311
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Liam D’Arcy Brown and Gary Watt for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this piece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Probert, R. Equality in the Family Home?. Fem Leg Stud 15, 341–353 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-007-9065-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-007-9065-y