Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: successful systematic implementation of a group approach to genetic counselling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase in referrals to cancer genetics clinics, partially associated with the “Angelina Jolie effect”, presents a challenge to existing services, many are already running at full capacity. More efficient ways to deliver genetic counselling are therefore urgently needed. We now systematically offer group instead of standard individual counselling to patients with suspected Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Group sessions last 30 min. The first twenty consist of a presentation by the genetic counsellor, the next ten of a discussion involving a cancer geneticist and a psychologist. A short individual consultation ensues, where personal and family issues are addressed and consent obtained. Blood is drawn afterwards. Satisfaction and knowledge are evaluated. We report data for the Oct-2014–Aug-2015 period. 210 patients attended group counselling, up to eight simultaneously. We always fitted them within a 4-h time frame. Mean satisfaction score was 41/43. Knowledge scores increased from 3.1/6 to 4.9/6 post-counselling (p value < 2.2 × 10−16). Thanks to group counselling, we have withstood increases in referrals without compromising care. The “Angelina Jolie effect” and rapid developments in personalized medicine threaten to overwhelm cancer genetics clinics. In this context, our innovative approach should ensure that all patients have access to approved services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans DG, Barwell J, Eccles DM et al (2014) The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Res 16:442–447

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Eggermont AM, Caldas C, Ringborg U, Medema R, Tabernero J, Wiestler O (2014) Cancer Core Europe: a consortium to address the cancer care-cancer research continuum challenge. Eur J Cancer 50:2745–2746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deeks ED (2015) Olaparib: first global approval. Drugs 75:231–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zellerino B, Milligan SA, Brooks R, Freedenberg DL, Collingridge DS, Williams MS (2009) Development, testing, and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in the clinical genetics setting. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 151C:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calzone KA, Prindiville SA, Jourkiv O et al (2005) Randomized comparison of group versus individual genetic education and counseling for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3455–3464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothwell E, Kohlmann W, Jasperson K, Gammon A, Wong B, Kinney A (2012) Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats. Fam Cancer 11:97–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Otten E, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, van Tintelen JP, van Langen IM (2015) A group approach to genetic counselling of cardiomyopathy patients: satisfaction and psychological outcomes sufficient for further implementation. Eur J Hum Genet 23:1462–1467

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sukenik-Halevy R, Ludman MD, Ben-Shachar S, Raas-Rothschild A (2016) The time-consuming demands of the practice of medical genetics in the era of advanced genomic testing. Genet Med 18:372–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oza AM, Cibula D, Benzaquen AO et al (2015) Olaparib combined with chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:87–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meric-Bernstam F, Brusco L, Shaw K et al (2015) Feasibility of large-scale genomic testing to facilitate enrollment onto genomically matched clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 33:2753–2762

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Robson ME, Storm CD, Weitzel J, Wollins DS, Offit K, American Society of Clinical Oncology (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 28:893–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B et al (2015) American Society of Clinical oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 33:3660–3667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was selected for an oral presentation at the European Society of Human Genetics annual meeting held in Glasgow, UK, 6–9 June 2015. We are grateful to Frederique Legale and Caroline Baynes for logistical assistance. The Cancer Genetics Clinic at the Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris is supported by the French Institut National du Cancer (INCA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick R. Benusiglio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Olivier Caron was an invited speaker for Astra Zeneca. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benusiglio, P.R., Di Maria, M., Dorling, L. et al. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: successful systematic implementation of a group approach to genetic counselling. Familial Cancer 16, 51–56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9929-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9929-x

Keywords

Navigation