Abstract
In seeking to fulfil the ambition of the 2003 genetics white paper, Our Inheritance, Our Future, to ‘mainstream’ genetic knowledge and practices, the Department of Health provided start-up funding for pilot services in various clinical areas. These included seven cancer genetics projects, co-funded with Macmillan Cancer Support. To help to understand the challenges encountered by such an attempt at reconfiguring the organization and delivery of services in this field, a programme-level evaluation of the genetics projects was commissioned to consider the organizational issues faced. Using a qualitative approach, this research has involved comparative case-study work in 11 of the pilot sites, including four of the seven cancer genetics pilots. In this paper, the researchers present early findings from their work, focusing in particular on the cancer genetics pilots. They consider some of the factors that have influenced how the pilots have sought to address pre-existing sector, organizational and professional boundaries to these new ways of working. The article examines the relationship between these factors and the extent to which pilots have succeeded in setting up boundary-spanning services, dealing with human-resource issues and creating sustainable, ‘mainstreamed’ provision which attracts ongoing funding in a volatile National Health Service commissioning environment where funding priorities do not always favour preventive, risk-assessment services.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Secretary of State for Health (2003) Our inheritance, our future: realising the potential of genetics in the NHS. The Stationery Office, London
Secretary of State for Health (2000) The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. HMSO, London
Glendinning C, Coleman A, Shipman C, Malbon J (2001) Primary care groups: progress in partnerships. BMJ 323:28–31
Powell M, Dowling B (2006) New Labour’s partnerships: comparing conceptual models with existing forms. Soc Policy & Soc 5:305–314
Currie G (2006) Managing knowledge across organizational and professional boundaries within public services. Public Money & Manage 26:83–84
Currie G, Suhomlinova O (2006) The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: the triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Adm 84:1–30
Bate P (2000) Changing the culture of a hospital: from hierarchy to networked community. Public Adm 79:485–512
Ferlie E, Hartley J, Martin S (2003) Changing public service organisations: current perspectives and future prospects. Br J Manage 14:S1–S14
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14:532–550
Yin R (1994) Case study research and methods. Sage, London
McIntosh A, Shaw C, Evans G, Turnbull N, Bahar N, Barclay M, Easton D, Emery J, Gray J, Halpin J, Hopwood P, McKay J, Sheppard C, Sibbering M, Watson W, Wailoo A, Hutchinson A (2004; updated 2006) Clinical guidelines and evidence review for the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care/University of Sheffield. NICE guideline CG014. www.nice.org.uk
Women’s Concerns Study Group (2001) Raising concerns about family history of breast cancer in primary care consultations: prospective, population based study. BMJ 322:27–28
Welsh T, Pringle M (2001) Social capital. BMJ 323:177–178
Dopson S, FitzGerald L, Ferlie E, Gabbay J, Locock L (2002) No more magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based. Health Care Manage Rev 27(3):35–47
Addicott R, McGivern G, Ferlie E (2007) The distortion of a managerial technique? The case of clinical networks in UK health care. Br J Manage 18:93–105
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge with gratitude the Department of Health, which funded this research, the practitioners, managers and service users who gave up their time to be interviewed, and Dr Ros Eeles, Professor Gareth Evans, Dr Janice Koistinen and an anonymous referee for their comments on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, G.P., Finn, R. & Currie, G. National evaluation of NHS genetics service investments: emerging issues from the cancer genetics pilots. Familial Cancer 6, 257–263 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-007-9130-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-007-9130-3