Abstract
We report the results of an experimental investigation of a key axiom of economic theories of dynamic decision making—namely, that agents plan. Inferences from previous investigations have been confounded with issues concerning the preference functionals of the agents. Here, we present an innovative experimental design which is driven purely by dominance: if preferences satisfy dominance, we can infer whether subjects are planning or not. We implement three sets of experiments: the first two (the Individual Treatments) in which the same player takes decisions both in the present and the future; and the third (the Pairs Treatment) in which different players take decisions at different times. The two Individual treatments differed in that, in one, the subjects played sequentially, while, in the other, the subjects had to pre-commit to their future move. In all contexts, according to economic theory, the players in the present should anticipate the decision of the player in the future. We find that over half the participants in all three experimental treatments do not appear to be planning ahead; moreover, their ability to plan ahead does not improve with experience, except possibly when we force subjects to pre-commit to their future decision. These findings identify an important lacuna in economic theories, both for individual behaviour and for behaviour in games.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkan, R., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1999). Changing plans: dynamic inconsistency and the effect of experience on the reference point. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 547–554.
Beard, T. R., & Beil, R. O. (1994). Do people rely on the self-interested maximization of others? An experimental test. Management Science, 40, 252–262.
Busemeyer, J. R., Weg, E., Barkan, R., Li, X., & Ma, Z. (2000). Dynamic consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 79, 530–545.
Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C. S., & Sugden, R. (1998). Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: an experimental investigation. Economic Journal, 108, 1362–1380.
Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C. S., & Sugden, R. (2004). Dynamic decisions under uncertainty: some recent evidence from economics and psychology. In I. Brocas & J. D. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions : Vol. 2. Reasons and choices. London: Oxford University Press.
Hey, J. D. (2002). Experimental economics and the theory of decision making under risk and uncertainty. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 28, 5–21.
Hey, J. D. (2003). Are revealed intentions possible? (Discussion Paper). University of York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bone, J., Hey, J.D. & Suckling, J. Do people plan?. Exp Econ 12, 12–25 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9187-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9187-8