Abstract
I argue that there are instances in which lying to an innocent and generally competent person respects her autonomy, contrary to arguments by Christine Korsgaard and Onora O’Neill. These authors say that respect for a person’s autonomy requires treating her in a way consistent with the possibility of consent, but I contend that the possibility of consent condition is unworkable. I maintain that lying can respect individual autonomy when being truthful to a person undermines her choices and lying gets her what she would reasonably see herself as having most reason to choose in the circumstances. I make my case by reflecting on lying invitations to a surprise party and on negotiation phenomena.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I rely on the assumption that one cannot consent to something unless one has good reason to think it possible. The assumption strikes me as plausible because in order to consent to something, one must have a clear idea about that to which one consents, and one cannot form a clear idea of the impossible. Hence one cannot consent to receive a round square.
I thank an anonymous referee for this point.
References
Aparly N (2003) Unprincipled virtue. Oxford University Press, New York
Buss S (2005) Valuing autonomy and respecting persons: manipulation, seduction, and the basis of moral constraints. Ethics 115:195–235
Carson T (2010) Lying and deception. Oxford University Press, New York
Dworkin G (2014) Paternalism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/paternalism/>
Fallis D (2015) Are bald-faced lies deceptive lies after all? Ratio 28:81–96
Hill T (1984) Autonomy and benevolent lies. J Value Inquiry 18:251–267
Kagan S (1997) Normative ethics. Westview Press, Boulder
Korsgaard C (1986) The right to lie: Kant on dealing with evil. Philos Public Aff 15:325–349
O’Neill O (1985) Between consenting adults. Philos Public Aff 14:252–277
Raiffa H (1982) The art and science of negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Shiffrin S (2014) Speech matters. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Stohr K (2014) Keeping the shutters closed: the moral value of reserve Philosophers’. Imprint 14:1–25