The ethics of information transparency
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The paper investigates the ethics of information transparency (henceforth transparency). It argues that transparency is not an ethical principle in itself but a pro-ethical condition for enabling or impairing other ethical practices or principles. A new definition of transparency is offered in order to take into account the dynamics of information production and the differences between data and information. It is then argued that the proposed definition provides a better understanding of what sort of information should be disclosed and what sort of information should be used in order to implement and make effective the ethical practices and principles to which an organisation is committed. The concepts of “heterogeneous organisation” and “autonomous computational artefact” are further defined in order to clarify the ethical implications of the technology used in implementing information transparency. It is argued that explicit ethical designs, which describe how ethical principles are embedded into the practice of software design, would represent valuable information that could be disclosed by organisations in order to support their ethical standing.
- Ahrens, M. (2006). Computer and computer peripheral fires with a discussion of batteries. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
- Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.
- Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: Wiley.
- Floridi, L. (2004). Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy, 35, 554–582. CrossRef
- Floridi, L. (2006). The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 185–200. CrossRef
- Floridi, L. (2007). In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 3(1), 31–41.
- Floridi, L. (2008). Data. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Detroit: Macmillan.
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods (UW CSE Technical Report 02-12-01). Department of Computer Science and Engineering: Seattle, University of Washington.
- Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., & Science Museum (Great Britain) (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology, 1996–2000: The years of controversy. London: Science Museum.
- Harvey, B. (1995). Ethical banking: The case of the co-operative bank. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(12), 1005–1013. CrossRef
- Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., & Harrison, D. (2004). Developing the concept of transparency for use in supply relationships. British Journal of Management, 15, 291–302. CrossRef
- Löfstedt, R. E., & Renn, O. (1997). The Brent Spar controversy: An example of risk communication gone wrong. Risk Analysis, 17(2), 131–136. CrossRef
- Magretta, J. (1997). Growth through global sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 78–88.
- Mallin, C. (2002). The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and financial disclosure. Corporate governance, 10(4), 253. CrossRef
- Moll, R. (2003). Ford motor company and the firestone tyre recall. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(3), 200–211. CrossRef
- Moor, J. H. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. SIGCAS Computer and Society, 27(3), 27–32. CrossRef
- Sanders, J., & Turilli, M. (2007). Dynamics of control. In TASE 2007 (pp. 440–449).
- Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). The metaphilosophy of information. Minds and Machines, 17(3), 331–344. CrossRef
- Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). Information gain from inference. In LogKCA-07, international workshop on logic and philosophy of knowledge, rationality, and action (pp. 351–368). Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain: The University of Basque Country Press.
- Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 194–205. CrossRef
- Turilli, M. (2007). Ethical protocols design. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 253–262.
- Turilli, M. (2008). Ethics and the practice of software design. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy. Amsterdam: IOS.
- Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2006). Firm information transparency: Ethical questions in the information age. In Social informatics: An information society for all? In remembrance of Rob Kling (pp. 145–156). New York: Springer.
- Warwick, S. (2001). Is copyright ethical? An examination of the theories, laws and practices regarding the private the private ownership of intellectual work in the United States. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp.␣263–279). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
- Winkler, B. (2000). Which kind of transparency? On the need for clarity in monetary policy-making. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
- The ethics of information transparency
Ethics and Information Technology
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 105-112
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Information transparency
- Semantic information
- Computer ethics
- Software design
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Oxford University Computing Laboratory (OUCL), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 2. Oxford e-Research Centre (OeRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 3. Information Ethics Group (IEG), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 4. Research Group in Philosophy of Information (GPI), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- 5. Centre for Ethics and Economics and Business, Universidade Católica Portugueasa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 6. Department of Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK