Skip to main content
Log in

Information ethics and the law of data representations

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theories of information ethics articulated by Luciano Floridi and his collaborators have clear implications for law. Information law, including the law of privacy and of intellectual property, is especially likely to benefit from a coherent and comprehensive theory of information ethics. This article illustrates how information ethics might apply to legal doctrine, by examining legal questions related to the ownership and control of the personal data representations, including photographs, game avatars, and consumer profiles, that have become ubiquitous with the proliferation of information and communication technologies. Recent controversy over the control of player performance statistics in “fantasy” sports leagues provides a limiting case for the analysis. Such data representations will in many instances constitute the kind of personal data that information ethics asserts constitutes an information entity. Legal doctrine in some instances proves sympathetic to such an assertion, but remains largely inchoate as to which data might constitute a given information entity in a given instance. Neither is information ethics, in its current state of development, entirely helpful in answering this critical question. While information ethics holds some promise to bring coherence to this area of the law, further work articulating a richer theory of information ethics will be necessary before it can do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Bartow. Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization and Gender. University of San Francisco Law Review, 34: 633–704, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Burk. Legal Consequences of the Cyberspatial Metaphor. In M. Consalvo et al. editors, Internet Research Annual Vol. 1: Selected Papers from The Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000–2002, pp. 17–24. Peter Lang, 2003

  • D. Burk. Expression, Selection, Abstraction: Copyright’s Golden Braid. Syracuse Law Review, 55: 593–618, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Burk. Electronic Gaming and the Ethics of Information Ownership 4. International Review of Information Ethics 4, 2006a. http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/004/burk.pdf

  • D. Burk. Privacy and Property in the Global Datasphere. In: S. Hongladarom and C. Ess, editors, Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 94–107, Idea Group, 2006b

  • D. Burk. Method and Madness in Copyright Law. Utah Law Review, 2007: 587–618, 2007

  • C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Mass Media, L.P., 443 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (E.D. Mo. 2006)

  • L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundations of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1: 37–56, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Floridi. On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4:287–304, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Floridi. The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7: 185–200, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Floridi. Four Challenges for a Theory of Information Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 8: 109–119, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Floridi, J.W. Sanders. Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 3: 55–66, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Gibson. Idoru. Penguin, 1996

  • S. Haack. On Logic in the Law: “Something but not All”. Ratio Juris, 20: 1–31(2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Heyman. The Birth of the Authornym: Authorship, Pseudonymity, and Trademark Law 80. Notre Dame Law Review, 80: 377, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Malkan. Stolen Photographs: Personality, Publicity, and Privacy. Texas Law Review, 75: 779–835, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McKenna. The Right of Publicity and Autonomous Self-Definition. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 67: 225–294, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McKenna. The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law. Notre Dame Law Review, 82: 1839–1916, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Negroponte. Being Digital. Vintage Books, New York, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Radin. Property and Personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34: 97–1015, 1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Reidenberg. Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52:1315–1371, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Starke-Meyering, D. Burk, and L. Gurak. American Internet Users and Privacy: A Safe Harbor of Their Own? In P.E.N. Howard and S. Jones, editors, Society Online: The Internet in Context, pp. 275–294. Sage, 2004

  • P. Swire, R. Litan. None of Your Business: World Data Flows, Electronic Commerce, and the European Privacy Directive. Brookings, Washington DC, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Weiner. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society, (2nd ed.). Doubleday Anchor, 1954

  • A.F. Westin. Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York, 1968

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan L. Burk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burk, D. Information ethics and the law of data representations. Ethics Inf Technol 10, 135–147 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9161-y

Keywords

Navigation