Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovating teacher education in a complex era

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meteoric increase in technological advancement in the last few decades has dramatically transformed how people live their lives. Innovation is seen to be essential as it ensures sustainable growth in a knowledge-based economy and a competitive global marketplace. Consequently, enabling innovation to occur becomes of prime concern to educators and policymakers. Education for the twenty-first century is about developing multiple intelligences and this demands for a holistic education system committed to enabling a learner to achieve his/her maximum potential. The learning environment in the twenty-first century needs to encompass a multiplicity of places, ideas and people that is technologically driven and often, a virtual rather than a physical space. The responsibility for creating such an environment lies in the teacher. This paper focuses on the role that teachers play in designing a powerful learning environment to drive twenty-first century learning and how teacher education must be re-designed to bring about possibilities of innovation. Possible design features of innovative teacher education programmes are outlined, including the need for a university-based teacher education programme, a strong emphasis on values and the changing role of teachers as mediators and designers of the learning environment. In order to nurture a future generation of strong thinkers, innovative problem-solvers and responsible and active local and global citizens, teachers need to consider teaching as a high calling. Finally, the paper emphasises the need for there to be strong partnerships and systemic coherence between key stakeholders of Education in order for the innovations to bring about transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, B. (2004). E-portfolios: Their use and benefits. Bristol: Tribal Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2014). The role of research in teacher education: Reviewing the evidence. London: British Educational Research Association and Action and Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(3), 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, B. (2014). Teacher training: We need more balance between school direct and PGCE. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2014/jan/22/teacher-training-school-direct-pgce.

  • Cornell University, INSEAD, & World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2014). In S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, & S. Wunsch-Vincent (Eds.), The global innovation index 2014. Geneva.

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Society benefits when we spend more on education. New York: New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books, Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducharme, M. K., & Ducharme, E. R. (1993). School-based teacher education in the United States: An uneven evolution. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 18(2), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C., Hawley, W., & Zlotnick, M. (1985). Making a difference in educational quality through teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, M. (2010). Paper presented at the National College’s Annual Conference, Birmingham.

  • Gray, L. (2008). Effective practice with e-Portfolios: Supporting 21st century Learning. Bristol: JISC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, M. (1984). An evaluation of the rationale for required teacher education: Beginning teachers with or without teacher preparation. Paper presented at the National Commission on Excellence in Teacher Education, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

  • Heng, S. K. (2011). Opening address at the Ministry of Education (MOE) Work Plan Seminar on 22 September 2011. Singapore: Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2011/09/22/work-plan-seminar-2011.php.

  • Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Klecker, B. J., & Loadman, W. (1996). Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacher job satisfaction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 400 254).

  • Liu, W. C., & Tan, O. S. (2015). Teacher effectiveness: Beyond results and accountability. In O. S. Tan & W. C. Liu (Eds.), Teacher effectiveness: Capacity building in a complex learning era (pp. 335–345). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. B. (2000). Teachers as critical mediators of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Education (NIE). (2009). TE21: A teacher education model for the 21st century. Singapore: National Institute of Education (NIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. G. (1985). The quality of prospective teachers: Education vs. noneducation graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, R. (2010). The promise and challenge of university based teacher education. Focus on Learning and Teaching, 21–25.

  • Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259–297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedd, P. J. (2012). Teaching is our calling: Do something worthwhile!. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 29(2), 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Lippincott, A., & Bower, D. (1998). The inherent tensions in the multiple uses of portfolios in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, C., Goerss, B., & Watkins, M. (2005). Implementing portfolios in a teacher education program. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(2), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S. (2007). Problem-based learning pedagogies: Psychological processes and enhancement of intelligences. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S. (Ed.). (2012). Teacher education frontiers: International perspectives on policy and practice for building new teacher competencies. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S., Liu, W. C., & Low, E. L. (2012). Educational reforms and teacher education innovations in Singapore. In O. S. Tan (Ed.), Teacher education frontiers: International perspectives on policy and practice for building new teacher competencies (pp. 71–91). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, S. (2008). Swimming upstream: Shifting the purpose of an existing teaching portfolio requirement. The Professional Educator, 32, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oon Seng Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, O.S. Innovating teacher education in a complex era. Educ Res Policy Prac 14, 193–200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9181-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9181-4

Keywords

Navigation