Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify factors that impacted on the performance and attractiveness of the Academic Director’s role. Academic Directors are responsible for leading and managing an academic qualification. Academic Directors (\(n=101\)) participating in a leadership development programme were invited to respond to an online \(360^\circ \) feedback survey. They invited (\(n=808\)) Significant Others to provide feedback using the same \(360^\circ \) survey. In the main, there was agreement between the two groups on impact factors. The factors impacting strongly on performance were focused on workload points, complexity of the role, knowledge and skills, people skills and others’ expectations. The factors impacting strongly on role attractiveness were around working conditions, autonomy and authority, clarity of work goals and expectations of others. Middle level academic management positions in higher education are poorly researched and the implications of this research with respect to job design, leadership development and recruitment and retention are significant. This is the first study of its kind to investigate factors impacting on the performance of the Academic Director role.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Rubaish, A. M., Rahim, I. A., Abumadini, M. S., & Wosornu, L. (2009). Job satisfaction among the academic staff of a Saudi university: an evaluative study. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 16(3), 97–103. Retrieved May 17, 2012, from http://www.ssfcm.org/english/index.php?fuseaction=content.main&mainsection=0000000893&artical=0000001954&page%5B1%5D=1
Anderson, G. (2006). Carving out time and space in the managerial university. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(5), 578–592.
Atwater, L. E., Brett, J. F., & Charles, A. C. (2007). Multisource feedback: Lessons learned and implications for practice. Human Resource Management, 46(2), 285–307. doi:10.1002/hrm.20161.
Bellamy, S., Morley, C., & Watty, K. (2003). Why business academics remain in Australian Universities despite deteriorating working conditions and reduced job satisfaction: An intellectual puzzle. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 13–28.
Byrne, M., Chughtai, A. A., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2012). Job satisfaction among accounting and finance academics: Empirical evidence from Irish higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(2), 153–167. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2012.662740.
Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2010). Across the great divide: What do Australian academics think of university leadership? Advice from the CAP Survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(4), 379–387.
Coates, H., Dobson, I., Edwards, D., Friedman, T., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2009). The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession: A comparative analysis, research briefing. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Currie, J., & Newson, J. (1998). Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Currie, J., & Vidovich, L. (1998). The ascent towards corporate managerialism in American and Australian universities. In R. Martin (Ed.), Chalklinkes: The politics of work in the managed university (pp. 112–144). London: Duke University Press.
Currie, G., & Procter, S. (2005). The antecedents of middle managers’ strategic contribution: The case of a professional bureaucracy. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1325–1356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00546.x.
Dawkins, J. (1998). Higher education: A policy statement. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The changing nature of the Academic Deanship. Leadership, 5(3), 347–64. doi:10.1177/1742715009337765.
de Boer, H., Goedegebuure, L., Meek, L. (2010). The changing nature of academic middle management: A framework for analysis. In V. L. Meek, et al. (Eds.), Higher education dynamics (Vol. 33, pp. 229–241). doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5_12.
Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, L., & Knight, P. (1996). Transforming Higher Education. London: Open University Press/Taylor & Francis.
Holmes, (1993). Quality assurance in further and higher education: A sacrifical lamb on the altar of managerialism. Quality Assurance in Education, 1(1), 4.
Iaffaldano, M., & Muchinsky, P. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 251–273.
Johnson, R. (2002). Learning to manage the university: Tales of training and experience. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(1), 33–51.
Judge, T., Thorenson, C., Bono, J., & Patton, G. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407.
Ladyshewsky, R., & Flavell, H. (2012). Transfer of training in an academic leadership development program for program coordinators. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40(1), 127–147.
Lazarsfeld, Jensen, A., & Morgan, K. (2009). Overload: The Role of Work-Volume Escalation and Micro-Management of Academic Work Patterns in Loss of Morale and Collegiality at UWS: The Way Forward, research report. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: National Tertiary Education Union.
Lindner, J. R. (1998). Understanding employee motivation. Journal of Extension, 36(3), 1–8. Retrieved May 17, 2012, from http://www.joe.org/joe/1998june/rb3.php.
Marginson, S. (2010). The limits of market reform in higher education. Higher Education Reform, 7, 1–19.
McRoy, I., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Leading change in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 687–704.
Mercer, J. (2009). Junior academic-manager in higher education: An untold story? International Journal of Educational Management, 23(4), 348–359. doi:10.1108/09513540910957444.
Meek, V., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2010). Introduction. In V. L. Meek, et al. (Eds.), The changing dynamics of higher education middle management. Higher education dynamics (Vol. 33, pp. 1–14). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9163-5_3.
Petty, M. G., & Cavender, J. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 712–721.
Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A. (2003). 360-degree assessment: Time for reinvention. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3), 297–311.
Vilkinas, T., & Ladyshewsky, R. (2012). Leadership behaviour and effectiveness of academic program directors in Australian universities. Educational Management Administration and Leadership., 40(1), 109–126.
Vilkinas, T. (2009). Improving the Leadership Capability of Academic Coordinators in Postgraduate and Undergraduate Programs in Business, Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Surry Hills, New South Wales. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/Improving%20the%20leadership%20capacity%20-%20UniSA%20Apr09.pdf.
Wong, E. S. K., & Heng, T. N. (2009). Case study of factors influencing jobs satisfaction in two Malaysian universities. International Business Research, 2(2), 86–98. Retrieved May 17, 2012, from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/viewFile/1123/1125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vilkinas, T., Ladyshewsky, R.K. Factors impacting job performance and role attractiveness in Academic Directors and their implications for policy and practice in higher education. Educ Res Policy Prac 13, 101–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-013-9153-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-013-9153-5