Skip to main content
Log in

Causal Compatibilism – What Chance?

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Orthodox physicalism has a problem with mental causation. If physics is complete and mental events are not identical to physical events (as multiple-realisation arguments imply) it seems as though there is no causal work for the mental to do. This paper examines some recent attempts to overcome this problem by analysing causation in terms of counterfactuals or conditional probabilities. It is argued that these solutions cannot simultaneously capture the force of the completeness of physics and make room for mental causation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crane, T.: 1995, ‘Mental Causation’, Aristotelian Society, Supplement 69, pp. 211–236

  • Horgan, T.: 1989, ‘Mental Quasation’, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 3

  • F. Jackson (1996) ArticleTitle‘Mental Causation’ Mind 105 337–413 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/105.419.377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Jackson P. Pettit (1991) ArticleTitle‘Program Explanation: A General Perspective’ Analysis 50 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1993) Supervenience and Mind Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1998) Mind in a Physical World MIT Press Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1973) ArticleTitle‘Causation’ Journal of Philosophy 70 556–567

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (2000) ArticleTitle‘Causation as Influence’ Journal of Philosophy 97 182–197

    Google Scholar 

  • B Loewer (2001) ‘From Physics to Physicalism’ C Gillett B Loewer (Eds) Physicalism and Its Discontents Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald Graham Cynthia (1995) ‘Causal Relevance and Explanatory exclusion” Macdonald Macdonald (Eds) Philosophy of Psychology Blackwell Oxford Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Noordhof (1999) ArticleTitle‘Probabilistic Causation, Pre-emption and Counterfactuals’ Mind 108 95–125 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/108.429.95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordhof, P.: 2003, ‘Not Old ... But Not That New Either: Explicability, Emergence, and the Characterisation of the Mental’, in Walter, Sven and Heckmann, Hans-Deiter (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation, Imprint Academic, Exeter

  • M. Ramachandran (2000) ArticleTitle‘Noordhof on Probabilistic Causation’ Mind 109 309–313 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/109.434.309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Rudder Baker (1995) ‘Metaphysics and Mental Causation’ Heil Mele (Eds) Mental Causation Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Schaffer (2000) ArticleTitle‘Trumping Pre-emption’ Journal of Philosophy 97 165–181

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober (1999) ArticleTitle‘Physicalism from a Probabilistic Point of View’ Philosophical Studies 95 135–174 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004519608950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Yablo (1992) ArticleTitle‘Mental Causation’ Philosophical Review 101 245–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Ritchie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchie, J. Causal Compatibilism – What Chance?. Erkenntnis 63, 119–132 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3056-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3056-7

Keywords

Navigation