Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and temporal variation of mercury load in surface water and sediments around an integrated steel plant in India

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal burning in the steel industry is the chief source of mercury presence in surrounding environment. About 20 water-storage ponds and three natural water streams are located in adjoining areas of an integrated steel plant in Bhilai, India. Hundreds of hospital admissions with chronic ailments due to hazardous emissions from the steel industry are frequently reported. Many of these ailments are related to reported mercury-poisoning diseases. Measurements of mercury levels in various environmental matrices around this industrial area was started early in the 1990s. From 1990–1995, few environmental samples were analyzed for mercury content but from 1995 onwards, comprehensive assessment of mercury load along with other toxic metals in various environmental matrices were begun. This work synthesizes and compares data of mercury in the surface water from three major field programs, in 1997, 2002, and 2006. The focus is on both spatial and temporal variation. In the present survey (2006), mercury levels are significantly higher compared to subsequent surveys and have shown 10–18 times higher values compared to 2001 and 1997 surveys. The differences in Hg levels between downwind and other sites in three survey programs are found to be in order: 1997 > 2001 > 2006. Regression between water and sediment mercury levels has shown variation in correlation values and higher in winter season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adimado AA, Baah DA (2002) Mercury in human blood urine, hair, nail, and fish from the Ankobra and Tano River Basins in southwestern Ghana. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 68:339–346. doi:10.1007/s001280259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christian GD (2003) Analytical chemistry, 6th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 73–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson A (1998) Spatial modeling in sediments. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, Linköping

  • Dopp E, Hartmann LM, Florea AM, Rettenmeier AW, Hirner AV (2004) Environmental distribution, analysis and toxicity of organometal (loid) compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 34:301–333. doi:10.1080/10408440490270160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) Ambient air pollution by mercury (Hg) Position Paper; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  • Fitzgerald WF (1994) Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury. Presented at the DOE/FDA/EPA, workshop on methylmercury and human health, Bethesda, pp 22–23 March

  • Geller MD, Chang M, Sioutas C, Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ (2002) Indoor–outdoor relationship and chemical composition of fine and coarse particles in the southern California deserts. Atmos Environ 36:1099–1110. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00340-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RO (1987) Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Wiley, New York, pp 4–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrsion KA (1966) Blood volume changes in normal pregnant Nigerian women. J Obstet Gynaec Br Cwlth 73:717–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecock I, Pirrone N (2001) Mercury and photochemistry in the marine boundary layer: modelling studies suggest the in situ production of reactive gas phase mercury. Atmos Environ 35:3055–3062. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00109-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (1992) Statistical methods in water resources. Elsevier Science Publication, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson RJM, Gherini SA, Fitzgerald WF, Porcella DB (1995) Anthropogenic influences on the global mercury cycle: a model-based analysis. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:265–272. doi:10.1007/BF01189676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kales SN, Goldman RH (2002) Mercury exposure: current concepts, controversies, and a clinic’s experience. J Occup Environ Med 44:143–154. doi:10.1097/00043764-200202000-00009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist O, Johansson K, Aastrup M, Andersson A, Bringmark L, Hovsenius G, Hakanson L, Iverfeldt A, Meili M, Timm B (1991) Mercury in the Swedish environment—recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods. Water Air Soil Pollut 55:23–32

  • Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF, Morel MM (1994) The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: anthropogenic influences. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58(15):3191–3198. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(94)90046-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montaser A, Golightiy DW (1987) Inductive coupled plasma in analytical atomic spectrometry, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nriagu JO (1979) The biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment. Elsevier-Biomedical Press Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacyna JM, Keeler G (1995) Sources of mercury in the Arctic. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:621–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM (2002) Global emission of mercury from anthropogenic sources in 1995. Atmos Environ 137:149–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacyna E, Pacyna JM, Pirrone N (2001) Atmospheric mercury emissions in Europe from anthropogenic sources. Atmos Environ 35:2987–2996. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00102-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pervez S, Pandey GS (1997) Mercury spillage through smoke-stake of an integrated steel plant: effect on soil and ground water. Indian J Chem Technol 4:49–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen G, Iverfelt A, Munthe J, Pleijel K, Bloxam R, Vinod Kumar A (1998) A comprehensive Eulerian modeling framework for airborne mercury species: development and testing of the tropospheric chemistry module (TCM). Atmos Environ 32(5):829–843. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00049-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirrone N, Keeler GJ, Nriagu JO (1996) Regional differences in world-wide emissions of mercury to the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 30:2981–2987. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(95)00498-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirrone N, Hedgecock IM, Forlano L (2000) Role of the ambient aerosol in the atmospheric processing of semivolatile contaminants: a parameterized numerical model gas-particle partitioning (GASPAR). J Geophys Res 105(D8):9773–9790. doi:10.1029/1999JD901206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirrone N, Costa P, Pacyna JM, Ferrara R (2001) Mercury emissions to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources in the Mediterranean region. Atmos Environ 35:2997–3006. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00103-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirrone N, Ferrara R, Hedgecock IM, Kallos G, Mamane Y, Munthe J, Pacyna JM, Pytharoulis I, Sprovieri F, Voudouri A, Wangberg I (2003) Dynamic processes of mercury over the Mediterranean region: results from the Mediterranean Atmospheric Mercury Cycle System (MAMCS) project. Atmos Environ 37(Supplement No. 1):S21–S39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel K, Munthe J (1995) Modeling the atmospheric mercury cycle-chemistry in fog droplets. Atmos Environ 29(12):1441–1457. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(94)00323-D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto M, Kubota M, Liu XJ, Murata K, Nakai K, Satoh H (2004) Maternal and fetal mercury and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a risk and benefit of fish consumption to fetus. Environ Sci Technol 38:3860–3863. doi:10.1021/es034983m

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seth PC (1983) Determination of some pollutants in industrial wastes. PhD Thesis, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur

  • Sharma R (2002) Characterization and impact assessment of emitted dusts in selected environments. PhD Thesis, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur

  • Shelton LR (1994) Field guide for collecting and processing stream-water samples for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. US Geol Surv Open-File Report 94-455, 42

  • Shelton LR, Capel PD (1994) Guidelines for collecting and processing samples of stream bed sediment for analysis of trace elements and organic contaminants for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. US Geol Surv Open-File Report 94-458, 20

  • Shrivasatava RC (2003) Guidance and awareness raising materials under new UNEP mercury programs (Indian scenario). Center for Environment Pollution Monitoring and Mitigation, Lucknow

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedy RK, Goel PK (1998) An introduction to air pollution. Technoscience Publication, Jaipur

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2002) Global mercury assessment; United Nation Environmental Program-Chemicals, Geneva, Switzerland

  • USEPA (1994) Mercury in atmospheric processes: a synthesis report. Expert panel on mercury in atmospheric processes. Report no. TR-104214, United States Environmental Protection Agency, USA

  • USEPA (1997) Mercury study report to congress volume II: an inventory of anthropogenic mercury emissions in the United States, EPA-452/R-97-004, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, USA

  • Vandal GM, Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF (1991) Cycling of volatile mercury in temperate lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut 56:791–803. doi:10.1007/BF00342317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2003) Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. Concise international chemical assessment document 50. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong CSC, Duzgoren-Aydin NS, Adnan A, Wong MH (2005) Sources and trends of environmental mercury emissions. Asia Sci Total Environ 368(2–3):649–662. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.024

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida M (1998) Elemental and inorganic mercury poisoning. Jpn J Toxicol Environ Health 44:168–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (A. Koshle) is thankful to the Ministry of Environment and Forest New, Delhi and School of Studies in Chemistry, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur for providing the financial assistance and laboratory facilities, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Studies in Chemistry, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, 492010, India

    Anubhuti Koshle & Shamsh Pervez

  2. Department of Engineering Chemistry, CSIT, Kolihapuri, Durg, 291010, India

    Yasmeen Pervez

Authors
  1. Anubhuti Koshle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yasmeen Pervez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shamsh Pervez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shamsh Pervez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koshle, A., Pervez, Y. & Pervez, S. Spatial and temporal variation of mercury load in surface water and sediments around an integrated steel plant in India. Environmentalist 29, 421–430 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9213-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9213-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation