Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Residue and intake risk assessment of prothioconazole and its metabolite prothioconazole-desthio in wheat field

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the environment, plants and animals in vivo, pesticides can be degraded or metabolized to form transformation products (TPs) or metabolites, which are even more toxic than parent pesticides. Hence, it was necessary to evaluate residue and risk of pesticides and their TPs (or metabolites). Here, a rapid, simple, and reliable method using QuEChERS and LC-MS/MS had been developed for simultaneous analysis of prothioconazole and its toxic metabolite, prothioconazole-desthio, in soil, wheat plant, straw, and grain. The average recoveries of prothioconazole and prothioconazole-desthio in four matrices ranged from 86 to 108% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 0.53–11.87% at three spiking levels. The method was successfully applied to investigate the dissipation and terminal residues of the two compounds in wheat field. It was shown that prothioconazole was rapidly degraded to prothioconazole-desthio, with half-lives below 5.82 days. Prothioconazole-desthio was slowly dissipated in soil and plant. The terminal residues of prothioconazole in wheat grain with a pre-harvest interval (PHI) of 21 or 28 days were below the maximum residue limits (MRLs) (0.1 mg/kg, Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC)). We also evaluated the intake risk of prothioconazole-desthio residues in wheat grain in China. For long-term intake assessment, the hazard quotients (HQ) ranged from 1.30 to 5.95%. For short-term intake assessment, the acute hazard indexes (aHI) ranged from 1.94 to 18.2%. It indicated that the intake risk of prothioconazole-desthio in wheat consumption was acceptable. Thus, the prothioconazole application on wheat with the scientific practices would not pose public health risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audenaert, K., Callewaert, E., Höfte, M., Saeger, S. D., & Haesaert, G. (2010). Hydrogen peroxide induced by the fungicide prothioconazole triggers deoxynivalenol (DON) production by fusarium graminearum. BMC Microbiology, 10(6), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). (2007). Evaluation of the new active prothioconazole in the product redigo fungicidal seed treatment. Canberra: Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Dong, B., Zhong, M., & Hu, J. (2015). Dissipation kinetics and residues of amidosulfuron and mcpa in wheat ecosystems based on a modified quechers and low-temperature cleanup method using the RRLC-QqQ-MS/MS technique. Analytical Methods, 7(24), 10299–10305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) (2016). Pesticide residues in food and feed. http://www.fao.org/faowho-codexalimentarius/standards/pestres/en/. Site accessed on 25th October 2016.

  • Edwards, S. G., & Godley, N. P. (2010). Reduction of fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol in wheat with early fungicide applications of prothioconazole. Food Additives and Contaminants-Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment, 27(5), 629–635.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017). EU pesticides database. http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticidesdatabase/public/?event=activesubstance.detail&language=EN&selectedID=1783. Site accessed on 18th March 2017.

  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2010). Reasoned opinion of efsa: modification of the existing MRLs for prothioconazole in various root vegetables. Efsa Journal, 8(7), n/a-n/a.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2008). List of Pesticides evaluated by JMPR and JMPS-P. http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/core-themes/theme/pests/ lpe/ lpe-p /en.

  • Ghani, S. B. A., & Abdallah, O. I. (2016). Method validation and dissipation dynamics of chlorfenapyr in squash and okra. Food Chemistry, 194, 516–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. Q., & Röder, M. S. (2004). Molecular mapping of powdery mildew resistance genes in wheat: a review. Euphytica, 137(2), 203–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Z. I., Ahmad, K., Rehman, S., Siddique, S., Bashir, H., Zafar, A., et al. (2016). Health risk assessment of heavy metals in wheat using different water qualities: implication for human health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7865-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H., Li, L., Qiu, J., Li, W., Yang, S., Zhou, Z., et al. (2013). Stereoselective transformation of triadimefon to metabolite triadimenol in wheat and soil under field conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 260(18), 929–936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malhat, F., Badawy, H. M. A., Barakat, D. A., & Saber, A. N. (2014). Residues, dissipation and safety evaluation of chromafenozide in strawberry under open field conditions. Food Chemistry, 152(6), 18–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. E., Warrilow, A. G. S., Cools, H. J., Fraaije, B. A., Lucas, J. A., Rigdova, K., Griffiths, W. J., Kelly, D. E., & Kelly, S. L. (2013). Mechanism of binding of prothioconazole to CYP51 differs from that of other azole antifungals. Applied & Environmental Microbiology Aem, 79, 1639–1645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souverain, S., Rudaz, S., & Veuthey, J. L. (2004). Matrix effect in LC-ESI-MS and LC-APCI-MS with off-line and on-line extraction procedures. Journal of Chromatography A, 1058(1–2), 61–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. D. (2005). Survey of nutrition and health status of Chinese residents. Beijing: People’s Health Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2008). Pesticide residues in food–2008: Part II–Toxicological evaluations. Rome, Italy: joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticide residues.

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2012). GEMS/Food consumption database. http://www.who.int/nutrition/landscape_analysis/nlis_gem_food/en/.

  • Xavier, S. A., Canteri, M. G., Barros, D. C. M., & Godoy, C. V. (2013). Sensitivity of corynesporacassiicola from soybean to carbendazim and prothioconazole. Tropical Plant Pathology, 38(5), 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, F., Dai, L., Wei, S., Cheng, G., & Li, L. (2015). Toxicokinetics and tissue distribution of prothioconazole in male adult Sprague-Dawley rats following a single oral administration. Xenobiotica, 45(5), 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing under Grant [number 8162029].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiYe Hu.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, H., Dong, B. & Hu, J. Residue and intake risk assessment of prothioconazole and its metabolite prothioconazole-desthio in wheat field. Environ Monit Assess 189, 236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5943-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5943-1

Keywords

Navigation