Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Residue level and dissipation pattern of spiromesifen in cabbage and soil from 2-year field study

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spiromesifen is a new class of insecticide used for the control of whiteflies and mites which have developed resistance to the more commonly used neonicotinoids. Dissipation pattern of spiromesifen on cabbage was evaluated over 2 years by conducting supervised field studies as per good agricultural practices. Cabbage and soil samples were extracted and purified using modified QuEChERS method and analyzed through gas chromatography (GC). Confirmatory studies were carried out by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The recoveries of spiromesifen from cabbage and soil were between 85.44 and 103.37 % with the relative standard deviation (RSD) between 3.2 and 9.4 % (n = 6). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.003 μg mL−1 and 0.01 mg kg−1, respectively. The measurement uncertainties (MUs) were within 9.9–14.9 %. Initial residues of spiromesifen on cabbage were 0.640 and 1.549 mg kg−1 during 2013 and 0.723 and 1.438 mg kg−1 during 2014 from treatments at standard and double doses of 125 and 250 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1, respectively. Spiromesifen residue dissipation followed first-order rate kinetics, and it degraded within the half-lives of 2.9 and 3.9 days during 2013 and 3.2 and 4.5 days during 2014. The residue levels reached below the maximum residue limit (MRL; 0.02 mg kg−1) within 15–17 days at the standard dose and 24–27 days at the double dose. The field soil analyzed at harvest (30 days) was free from spiromesifen residues. Metabolite spiromesifen-enol was not detected in any sample which was confirmed through LC-MS/MS analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abo-El-Seoud, M. A., Shams El-Din, A. M., Danial, L. N., & Ahmed, S. M. (1995). Residues and persistence of some organophosphorus insecticides applied to cabbage plants. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 29, 555–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alavo, T. B. C., & Abagli, A. Z. (2011). Effect of kaolin particle film formulation against populations of the aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt (Homoptera:Aphididae) in cabbage. Open Entomology Journal, 5, 49–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S. J., Stajnbaher, D., & Schenck, F. J. (2003). Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. Journal of AOAC International, 86, 412–431.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2005). Available at http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/registration/ais/publicreports/5858.pdf (Accessed 8 August 2015).

  • Anonymous. (2012). Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for spiromesifen in tea. European Food Safety Authority, EFSA Journal, 10, 3050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (2014). Hand book on horticulture statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation. Government of India: Ministry of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonious, G. F., Meyer, J. E., Rogers, J. A., & Hu, Y. H. (2007). Growing hot pepper for cabbage looper, Trichopulsia ni (Hubner) and spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Koch) control. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, 42, 559–567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, W. M. (1961). Mathematical treatment of the loss of pesticide residues. Plant Protection Bulletin (FAO), 9, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmellar, B., Fodor, P., Pareja, L., Ferrer, C., Martinez-Uroz, M. A., Valverde, A., & Fernandez-Alba, A. R. (2008). Validation and uncertainty study of a comprehensive list of 160 pesticides residues in multi-class vegetables by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1215, 37–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kontsedalov, S., Gottlieb, Y., Ishaaya, I., Nauen, R., Horowitz, R., & Ghanima, M. (2008). Toxicity of spiromesifen to the developmental stages of Bemisia tabaci biotype B. Wiley Interscience, 65, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotay, S. J., Koesukwiwat, U., Van Der Kamp, H., Mol, H. G. J., & Leepipatpiboon, N. (2011). Qualitative steps in the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables using fast, low-pressure gas chromatography–time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 59, 7544–7556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozowicka, B., Jankowska, M., & Kaczyn, S. P. (2012). Pesticide residues in Brassica vegetables and exposure assessment of consumers. Food Control, 25, 561–575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcic, D., Peric, P., Petronijevic, S., Prijovic, M., & Drobnjakovic, T. (2011). Cyclic ketoenols—acaricides and insecticides with a novel mode of action. Journal of Pesticide Fitomedicina, 26, 185–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mate, C. J., Mukherjee, I., & Das, S. K. (2015). Persistence of spiromesifen in soil: influence of moisture, light, pH and organic amendment. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 187(2), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauen, R., Bretschneider, T., Elbert, A., Fischer, R., & Tiemann, R. (2003). Spirodiclofen and spiromesifen. Pesticide Outlook, 14, 243–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhaker, N., & Toscano, N. C. (2008). Spiromesifen: a new pest management tool for whitefly management, in: Fourth International Bemisia Workshop International Whitefly Genomics Workshop. Journal of Insect Science, USA, 8, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, M. F., Solanki, P. P., Singh, S., Vaghela, K. M., Shah, P. G., Patel, A. R., & Diwan, K. D. (2012). Dissipation of spiromesifen in/on okra under middle Gujarat conditions. Pesticide Residue Journal, 24, 25–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, E., & Hirthe, G. (2014). Efficacy of drench and spray applications of insecticides to control cabbage whitefly Aleyrodes proletella, in: Proceedings of the IOBC/WPRS Working Group “Integrated Protection in Field Vegetables”, 25–28 September 2011, Sweden; and 23–25 September 2013, Bergerac, France. Journal of IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 107, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D., Ritcey, G. M., Harris, C. R., Denomme, M. A., & Brown, P. D. (2001). Pyrethroid insecticide residues on vegetable crops. Pest Management Science, 57, 683–687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SANCO (2013). European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Guidance document on analytical quality control and validation procedures for pesticide residue analysis in food and feed. Document SANCO/12571/2013, pp. 1–46.

  • Shahgholi, H., & Ahangar, A. G. (2014). Factors controlling degradation of pesticides in the soil environment. Agricultural Science and Development, 3, 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. K., Dubey, J., Kumar, A., Gupta, P., Kalpana, Singh, B., Sharma, I. D., & Nath, A. (2005). Persistence and safety evaluation of spiromesifen on apple (Malus domestica L) in India: a multi-locational study. Pesticide Residue Journal, 17, 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. K., Rao, C. S., Dubey, J. K., Patyal, S. K., Parihar, N. S., Battu, R. S., Sharma, V., Gupta, P., Kumar, A., Kalpana, Jaya, M., Singh, B., Sharma, I. D., Nath, A., & Gour, T. B. (2006). Persistence and dissipation kinetics of spiromesifen in chilli and cotton. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 132, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. K., Dubey, J. K., Deka, S. C., Chandrasekaran, S., Kalpana, Gupta, P., Kumar, A., Vandana, Z. Z., Devi, M. J., Singh, B., Baruah, A. A. L. H., Kennedy, J. S., Sharma, I. D., Patyal, S. K., & Nath, A. (2007). Dissipation kinetics of spiromesifen on tea (Camellia sinensis) under tropical conditions. Chemosphere, 68, 790–796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. K., Mukherjee, I., Singh, B., Mandal, K., Sahoo, S. K., Banerjee, H., Banerjee, T., Roy, S., Shah, P. G., Patel, H. K., Patel, A. R., Beevi, N., George, T., Mathew, T. B., Singh, G., Noniwal, R., & Devi, S. (2014). Persistence and risk assessment of spiromesifen on tomato in India: a multi-locational study. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 8453–8461.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A. K., Trivedi, P., Srivastava, M. K., Lohani, M., & Srivastava, L. P. (2011). Monitoring of pesticide residues in market basket samples of vegetable from Lucknow City, India: QuEChERS method. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 176, 465–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trdan, S., & Papler, U. (2002). Susceptibility of four different vegetable brassicas to cabbage whitefly (Aleyrodes proletella L., Aleyrodidae) attack, in: 54th International Symposium on Crop Protection, Part II, Gent, Belgium, 7 May, 2002. Journal Mededelingen-Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen Universiteit Gent, 67, 531–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. (2005). Behaviour of spiromesifen (Oberon®) in plants and animals. Planzenschutz- Nachrichten Bayer, 58, 391–416.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Director, IIHR, Bangalore, India, and Coordinator, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, New Delhi, for providing the facilities to carry out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soudamini Mohapatra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siddamallaiah, L., Mohapatra, S. Residue level and dissipation pattern of spiromesifen in cabbage and soil from 2-year field study. Environ Monit Assess 188, 155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5165-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5165-y

Keywords

Navigation