Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water and waste load allocation in rivers with emphasis on agricultural return flows: application of fractional factorial analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new methodology is developed to handle parameter and input uncertainties in water and waste load allocation (WWLA) in rivers by using factorial interval optimization and the Soil, Water, Atmosphere, and Plant (SWAP) simulation model. A fractional factorial analysis is utilized to provide detailed effects of uncertain parameters and their interaction on the optimization model outputs. The number of required optimizations in a fractional factorial analysis can be much less than a complete sensitivity analysis. The most important uncertain inputs and parameters can be also selected using a fractional factorial analysis. The uncertainty of the selected inputs and parameters should be incorporated real time water and waste load allocation. The proposed methodology utilizes the SWAP simulation model to estimate the quantity and quality of each agricultural return flow based on the allocated water quantity and quality. In order to control the pollution loads of agricultural dischargers, it is assumed that a part of their return flows can be diverted to evaporation ponds. Results of applying the methodology to the Dez River system in the southwestern part of Iran show its effectiveness and applicability for simultaneous water and waste load allocation in rivers. It is shown that in our case study, the number of required optimizations in the fractional factorial analysis can be reduced from 64 to 16. Analysis of the interactive effects of uncertainties indicates that in a low flow condition, the upstream water quality would have a significant effect on the total benefit of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, J. B., Beltrao, J., Aksoy, U., Anac, D., & Anac, S. (2012). Modeling the effect of salt removing species in crop rotation. International Journal of Energy and Environment, 3(6), 350–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters. Wiley New: York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, T., & Labadie, J. W. (2001). River basin network model for integrated water quantity/quality management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(5), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, M. C. (1990). Iterative linear programming solution of convex programs. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 65, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredericks, J., & Labadie, J. (1995). Decision support system for conjunctive stream-aquifer management. Completion Rep. Grant No. 14-08-0001-G1551-04 Proj. No. o3 Colorado Water Resour. Res. Inst. Colorado State University Ft. Collins Colo.

  • Huang, G. H. (1996). IPWM: an interval parameter water quality management model. Engineering Optimization, 26(2), 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2005). Waste-load allocation model for seasonal river water quality management: application of Sequential Dynamic Genetic Algorithms. Scientia Iranica, 12(2), 117–130.

  • Li, Y. P., Huang, G. H., Nie, S. L., & Mo, D. W. (2008). Interval-parameter robust quadratic programming for water quality management under uncertainty. Engineering Optimization, 40(7), 613–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesbah, S. M., Kerachian, R., & Nikoo, M. R. (2009). Developing real time operating rules for trading discharge permits in rivers: application of Bayesian networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesbah, S. M., Kerachian, R., & Torabian, A. (2010). Trading pollutant discharge permits in rivers using fuzzy nonlinear cost functions. Desalination, 250, 313–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafazadeh-Fard, B., Mansouri, H., Mousavi, S. F., & Feizi, M. (2008). Application of Swap model to predict yield and soil salinity for sustainable agriculture in an arid region. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 3(4), 334–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., & Karimi, A. (2012). A nonlinear interval model for water and waste load allocations in river basins. Water Resources Management, 26, 2911–2926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., Karimi, A., & Azadnia, A. A. (2013). Optimal water and waste-load allocations in rivers using a fuzzy transformation technique: a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(3), 2483–2502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niksokhan, M. H., Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2009). A game theoretic approach for trading discharge permits in rivers. Water Science and Technology, 60(3), 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noory, H., van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., Liaghat, A. M., Parsinejad, M., & van Dam, J. C. (2011). Distributed agro-hydrological modeling with SWAP to improve water and salt management of the Voshmgir Irrigation and Drainage Network in Northern Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1062–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorsepahy-Samian, H., Kerachian, R., & Nikoo, M. R. (2012). Water and pollution discharge permit allocation to agricultural zones: application of game theory and min-max regret analysis. Water Resources Management, 26(14), 4241–4257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X., Huang, G., Chen, B., & Zhang, B. (2009). An interval-parameter waste-load-allocation model for river water quality management under uncertainty. Environmental Management, 43, 999–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasikumar, K., & Mujumdar, P. (1998). Fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of a river system. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 124, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. (2004). Simulations on direct and cyclic use of saline waters for sustaining cotton–wheat in a semi-arid area of north-west India. Agricultural Water Management, 66, 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao Vemula, V. R., Mujumdar, P., & Ghosh, S. (2004). Risk evaluation in water quality management of a river system. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Peng, H., Li, Y., Tang, J., & Wu, B. (2010). A coupled water quantity–quality model for water allocation analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 24, 485–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Huang, G. H. (2011). Factorial two-stage stochastic programming for water resources management. Journal of Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the University of Tehran for this research under grant number 8102060/1/05.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Kerachian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavakoli, A., Kerachian, R., Nikoo, M.R. et al. Water and waste load allocation in rivers with emphasis on agricultural return flows: application of fractional factorial analysis. Environ Monit Assess 186, 5935–5949 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3830-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3830-6

Keywords

Navigation