Skip to main content
Log in

The EBS management model: an effective measure of e-commerce satisfaction in SMEs in the service industry from a management perspective

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many electronic commerce (e-commerce) systems have been successfully adopted in businesses across a number of different industries, a significant number have failed, especially in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It is therefore necessary to explore new methods to describe and measure e-commerce success from a business perspective.

Using the fifteen critical success factors (CSFs) obtained from previous works as a foundation, this continuing research explored an EBS Management Model categorised into five components including Marketing, Management Support & Customer Acceptance, Web Site Effectiveness & Cost, Managing Change, and Knowledge & Skills. Further research is needed to determine the weighting of these CSFs and components as a yardstick so that this EBS Management Model, as an established practical model, can be adopted by business managers for the pursuit of e-commerce success, and assist service industry SMEs in effectively adopting e-commerce systems using a business-focused approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benou, P., & Vassilakis, C. (2010). The conceptual model of context for mobile commerce applications. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(2), 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, M. Y., & Teng, C. I. (2013). A comprehensive model of the effects of online store image on purchase intention in an e-commerce environment? Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cagnina, M. R., & Poian, M. (2008). CellTrust: a reputation model for C2C commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(4), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Churchill, G. A., & Lacobucci, D. (2002). Marketing research methodological foundation. Thomson Learning, USA: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Field, A. (2005). Chap. 15: factor analysis on SPSS, discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Field, A. (2005). Chap. 15: Reliability analysis on SPSS, discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage, London.

  7. Gide, E., & Wu, M. X. (2007). A study to establish e-commerce business satisfaction model to measure e-commerce success in SMEs. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 1(3), 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garson, D. (2007). Scales and standard measures [online]. Viewed, 24 Oct 2007. http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/standard.htm.

  9. Garson, G. D. (2008). Reliability analysis [online]. Viewed 30 May 2008. http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/reliab.htm.

  10. Hanover (2012). Reliability analysis [online]. Viewed 12 December http://psych.hanover.edu/classes/ResearchMethods/Assignments/reliability-1.html.

  11. Kitchenham, B., & Pfieeger, S. L. (2002). Principles of survey research. Part 4. Questionnaire evaluation. Software Engineering Notes, 27(3), 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koutsabasis, P., Stavrakis, M., & Viorres, N. (2008). A descriptive reference framework for the personalisation of e-business applications. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(3), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehdonvirta, V. (2009). Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 1–2, pp.97-113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, J., Wang, L. Z., Yu, C. S., & Wu, J. Y. (2009). E-auction web assessment model in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malhotra, N., Hall, J., Shaw, M., & Oppenheim, P. (2006). Marketing research: an applied orientation. Australia: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PSU (2012). SPSS syntax. Viewed 12 December [online]. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/k/r/krm10/reliability.

  17. Schwab, A. J. (2002). Principal component analysis: additional topic [online]. Viewed 25 May 2008. http://www.utexas.edu/courses/schwab/sw388r7/SolvingProblems/PrincipalComponentAnalysis_Outliers_Validation_Reliability.ppt.

  18. SPSS (1998). Survey research using SPSS. Viewed 20 March 2006 [online]. www.ts.vcu.edu/manuals/spss/guides/Survey%20Research.pdf.

  19. Wu, M. X., Jewell, R., & Gide, E. (2012). An eyeball diagram: illustrating the common CSFs in e-commerce business satisfaction for successful adoption of e-commerce systems by SMEs. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 6(2), 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yaffee, R. A. (2003). Common correlation and reliability analysis with SPSS for Windows [online]. Viewed 2008. http://www.nyu.edu/its/statistics/Docs/correlate.html.

  21. Zikmund, W. G., & Babin, B. J. (2007). Exploring marketing research. USA: Thomson Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zikmund, W. G., Ward, S., Lowe, B., & Winzar, H. (2007). Marketing research. Australia: Nelson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingxuan Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, M., Gide, E. & Jewell, R. The EBS management model: an effective measure of e-commerce satisfaction in SMEs in the service industry from a management perspective. Electron Commer Res 14, 71–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9127-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9127-y

Keywords

Navigation