Skip to main content
Log in

A Critique of Atomistic Definitions of the Stress Tensor

  • Published:
Journal of Elasticity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current interest in nanoscale systems and molecular dynamical simulations has focussed attention on the extent to which continuum concepts and relations may be utilised meaningfully at small length scales. In particular, the notion of the Cauchy stress tensor has been examined from a number of perspectives. These include motivation from a virial-based argument, and from scale-dependent localisation procedures involving the use of weighting functions. Here different definitions and derivations of the stress tensor in terms of atoms/molecules, modelled as interacting point masses, are compared. The aim is to elucidate assumptions inherent in different approaches, and to clarify associated physical interpretations of stress. Following a critical analysis and extension of the virial approach, a method of spatial atomistic averaging (at any prescribed length scale) is presented and a balance of linear momentum is derived. The contribution of corpuscular interactions is represented by a force density field f. The balance relation reduces to standard form when f is expressed as the divergence of an interaction stress tensor field, T . The manner in which T can be defined is studied, since T is unique only to within a divergence-free field. Three distinct possibilities are discussed and critically compared. An approach to nanoscale systems is suggested in which f is employed directly, so obviating separate modelling of interfacial and edge effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Truesdell, C., Noll, W.: The non-linear field theories of mechanics. In: Flügge, S. (ed.) Handbuch der Physik, vol. III/3. Springer, Berlin (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eringen, A.C.: Mechanics of Continua. Wiley, New York (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurtin, M.E.: An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics. Academic, New York (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Murdoch, A.I.: Foundations of continuum modelling: a microscopic perspective with applications, AMAS Lecture Notes 7. Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw (2003)

  5. McLellan, A.G.: Virial theorem generalized. Am. J. Phys. 42, 239–243 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swenson, R.J.: Comments on virial theorems for bounded systems. Am. J. Phys. 51, 940–942 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai, D.H.: The virial theorem and stress calculation in molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 70, 1375–1382 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardy, R.J.: Formulas for determining local properties in molecular-dynamics simulations: shock waves. J. Chem. Phys. 76, 622–628 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Irving, J.H., Kirkwood, J.G.: The statistical theory of transport processes IV. The equations of hydrodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 18, 817–829 (1950)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murdoch, A.I., Bedeaux, D.: Continuum equations of balance via weighted averages of microscopic quantities. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 445, 157–179 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noll, W.: Der Herleitung der Grundgleichungen der Thermomechanik der Kontinua aus der statistischen Mechanik. J. Ration. Mech. Anal. 4, 627–646 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Root, S., Hardy, R.J., Swanson, D.R.: Continuum predictions from molecular dynamics simulations: shock waves. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 3161–3165 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murdoch, A.I.: On the microscopic interpretation of stress and couple stress. J. Elast. 71, 105–131 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmerman, J.A., Webb III, E.B., Hoyt, J.J., Jones, R.E., Klein, P.A., Bammann, D.J.: Calculation of stress in atomistic simulation. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 12, 5319–5322 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, M.: A new look at the atomic level virial stress: on continuum-molecular system equivalence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 2347–2392 (2003)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein, H., Poole, C., Safko, J.: Classical mechanics, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murdoch, A.I.: Some primitive concepts in continuum mechanics regarded in terms of objective space-time molecular averaging: the key rôle played by inertial observers. J. Elast. 84, 69–97 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Brush, S.G.: The kind of motion we call heat. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Groot, S.R., Mazur, P.: Non-equilibrium mechanics. Dover, Mineola (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murdoch, A.I.: On effecting averages and changes of scale via weighting functions. Arch. Mech. 50, 531–539 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Murdoch, A.I.: A critique of atomistic definitions of the stress tensor. Mathematics Departmental Research Report, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow (2007)

  22. Nicholson, M.M.: Surface tension in ionic crystals. Proc. R. Soc. A 228, 490–510 (1955)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gurtin, M.E., Murdoch, A.I.: A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 57, 291–323 (1975) and 59, 389–390 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Murdoch, A.I.: Some fundamental aspects of surface modelling. J. Elast. 80, 33–52 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, R.E., Tadmor, E.B.: The quasicontinuum method: overview, applications and current directions. J. Comput. Aided Mater. Des. 9, 203–239 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Friesecke, G., James, R.D.: A scheme for the passage from atomic to continuum theory for thin films, nanotubes and nanorods. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 1519–1540 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ian Murdoch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murdoch, A.I. A Critique of Atomistic Definitions of the Stress Tensor. J Elasticity 88, 113–140 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9121-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9121-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation