Skip to main content
Log in

Pea black spot disease complex on field pea: dissecting the roles of the different pathogens in causing epicotyl and root disease

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the relative importance of three well recognized devastating pathogens of field pea (Pisum sativum) on leaves and stems, Didymella pinodes, Phoma pinodella and P. koolunga, in also causing disease on epicotyls and roots. Two pea varieties, Kaspa and WAPEA2211, were inoculated with four isolates of each pathogen; subsequently epicotyl and root disease were scored accordingly. All pathogens caused epicotyl and root disease. D. pinodes isolates caused consistently severe disease on epicotyl, lateral root and tap root. Except for variable levels of disease on epicotyls, P. pinodella isolates also caused consistently high levels of disease on lateral and tap roots. While P. koolunga, generally caused less epicotyl and root disease than D. pinodes and P. pinodella, some isolates of P. koolunga caused severe tap root rot. For example, on WAPEA2211, P. koolunga (isolates#1 and #3) caused similar levels of tap root rot as with the two most virulent isolates of D. pinodes and as with the treatment with the three pathogens combined. The three pathogens combined treatment caused particularly severe disease on epicotyls, lateral and tap roots. For the first time, P. koolunga was shown to cause epicotyl and root disease on field pea, but less severe than the other two pathogens tested. Findings of this study highlight, for the first time, the relative roles of these three black spot pathogens, particularly P. koolunga; demonstrate a much wider and more significant adverse impact of the black spot complex than assumed historically; and underscore the additional challenges posed for pea breeders in developing black spot all-inclusive resistant varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, S. M., Nitschke, L. F., Dube, A. J., Krause, M. R., & Cameron, B. (1978). Selection of pea lines for resistance to pathotypes of Ascochyta pinodes, A. pisi and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. M., Sharma, B., & Ambrose, M. J. (1993). Current status and future strategy in breeding pea to improve resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica, 73, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (2013). Australian pulse - crop forecast (pulse Australia). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Pulse Australia Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbetti, M. J., & MacNish, G. C. (1984). Effects of cultivation and cultural practice on root rot of subterranean clover. Animal Production Science, 24, 550–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbetti, M. J., & Sivasithamparam, K. (1987). Effects of soil pasteurization on root rot, seedling survival and plant dry weight of subterranean clover inoculated with six fungal root pathogens. Crop and Pasture Science, 38, 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbetti, M. J., Wong, D. H., Sivasithamparam, K., & D’Antuono, M. F. (1986). Response of subterranean clover cultivars to root rot fungi. Annals of Applied Biology, 109, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeck, C. P. (2006). Simultaneous improvement in black spot resistance and stem strength in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

  • Bretag, T. W., Keane, P. J., & Price, T. V. (2006). The epidemiology and control of Ascochyta blight in field peas: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57, 883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T. W., Smith, L. M., & Ward, D. J. (2001). Effect of soil-borne ascochyta blight fungi on the grain yield of field peas. In 10th Australian Agronomy Conference, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, (Vol. 29).

  • Burdon, J. J., & Chilvers, G. A. (1982). Host density as a factor in plant disease ecology. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 20, 143–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittem, K. (2012). Genomics and management of Fusarium root rot of field peas. PhD thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, The USA.

  • Clulow, S. A., Matthews, P., & Lewis, B. G. (1991). Genetic analysis of resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in pea seedlings. Euphytica, 58, 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. A., Hartley, D., Priest, M., Herdina, M. K., McKay, A., & Scott, E. S. (2009). A new species of Phoma causes Ascochyta blight symptoms on field peas (Pisum sativum) in South Australia. Mycologia, 101, 120–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. A., & Kimber, R. B. E. (2007). Integrated disease management of Ascochyta blight in pulse crops. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 119, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. A., Krysinska-Kaczmarek, M., McKay, H. A., & Scott, E. S. (2012). Comparison of cultural growth and in planta quantification of Didymella pinodes, Phoma koolunga and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella, causal agents of Ascochyta blight on field pea (Pisum sativum). Mycologia, 104, 93–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. A., Krysinska-Kaczmarek, M., Wilmshurst, C. J., McKay, A., Herdina, & Scott, E. S. (2011). Distribution and survival of Ascochyta blight pathogens in field pea cropping soils of Australia. Plant Disease, 95, 1217–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2014). http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/Q/QC/E. Accessed 19/June/2014.

  • Fernandez, M. R. (2007). Fusarium populations in roots of oilseed and pulse crops grown in eastern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 87, 945–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaurilcikiene, I., Cesnuleviciene, R., Janusauskaite, D., & Ronis, A. (2012). Management of seed borne root and foot rot diseases of pea (Pisum sativum L.) with a fungicide seed treatment. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 99, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünwald, N. J., Coffman, V. A., & Kraft, J. M. (2003). Sources of partial resistance to Fusarium root rot in the Pisum core collection. Plant Disease, 87, 1197–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, D. J. (1984). Compendium of pea diseases. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: American Phytopathological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon, C., Baranger, A., Coyne, C. J., McGee, R. J., Le Goff, I., L’Anthoëne, V., et al. (2011). New consistent QTL in pea associated with partial resistance to Aphanomyces euteiches in multiple French and American environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 123, 261–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamon, C., Coyne, C. J., McGee, R. J., Lesné, A., Esnault, R., Mangin, P., et al. (2013). QTL meta-analysis provides a comprehensive view of loci controlling partial resistance to Aphanomyces euteiches in four sources of resistance in pea. BMC Plant Biology, 13, 45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. F., Lopetinsky, K., & Evans, I. R. (1991). Effects of seed infection by Ascochyta spp., fungicide seed treatment, and cultivar on yield parameters of field pea under field conditions. Canadian Plant Disease Survey, 71, 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. (1963). The root rot-Fusarium wilt complex of peas. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 16, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le May, C., Potage, G., Andrivon, D., Tivoli, B., & Outreman, Y. (2009). Plant disease complex: antagonism and synergism between pathogens of the Ascochyta blight complex on pea. Journal of Phytopathology, 157, 715–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. P., You, M. P., Finnegan, P. M., Khan, T. N., Lanoiselet, V., Eyres, N., & Barbetti, M. J. (2012). First report of black spot caused by Boerema exigua var. exigua on field pea in Australia. Plant Disease, 96, 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. P., You, M. P., Khan, T. N., Finnegan, P. M., & Barbetti, M. J. (2011). First report of Phoma herbarum on field pea (Pisum sativum) in Australia. Plant Disease, 95, 1590–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, W. J., Weipera, A., Ricard, L., Galloway, J., & Harrod, A. (2005). Blackspot does not persist in soil in Western Australia. pp. 343, In 11th Biennial Australasian Plant Pathology Society Conference, Geelong, Australia.

  • McKinney, H. H. (1923). Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helminthosporium sativum. Journal of Agricultural Research, 26, 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, K. E., Inglis, D. A., Gundersen, B., & Coyne, C. J. (2012). Mapping QTL for Fusarium wilt race 2 partial resistance in pea (Pisum sativum). Plant Breeding, 131, 300–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moussart, A., Tivoli, B., Lemarchand, E., Deneufbourg, F., Roi, S., & Sicard, G. (1998). Role of seed infection by the Ascochyta blight pathogen of dried pea (Mycosphaerella pinodes) in seedling emergence, early disease development and transmission of the disease to aerial plant parts. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, J. (1967). Root rot of canning and freezing peas in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 17, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onfroy, C., Baranger, A., & Tivoli, B. (2007). Biotic factors affecting the expression of partial resistance in pea to ascochyta blight in a detached stipule assay. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 119, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyarzun, P., Gerlagh, M., & Hoogland, A. E. (1993). Pathogenic fungi involved in root-rot of peas in the Netherlands and their physiological specialization. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 99, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyarzun, P., & van Loon, J. (1989). Aphanomyces euteiches as a component of the complex of foot and root pathogens of peas in Dutch soils. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 95, 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, L., Bødker, L., & Larsson-Wikström, M. (1997). Prevalence and pathogenicity of foot and root rot pathogens of pea in southern Scandinavia. Plant Disease, 81, 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilet-Nayel, M. L., Muehlbauer, F. J., McGee, R. J., Kraft, J. M., Baranger, A., & Coyne, C. J. (2002). Quantitative trait loci for partial resistance to Aphanomyces root rot in pea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106, 28–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilet-Nayel, M. L., Muehlbauer, F. J., McGee, R. J., Kraft, J. M., Baranger, A., & Coyne, C. J. (2005). Consistent quantitative trait loci in pea for partial resistance to Aphanomyces euteiches isolates from the United States and France. Phytopathology, 95, 1287–1293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, K. H. M., & Sykes, J. (1997). Pulse production in Australia past, present and future. Animal Production Science, 37, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, H. S., Li, Y. P., You, M. P., Khan, T. N., Pritchard, I., & Barbetti, M. J. (2014a). Temporal and spatial changes in the pea black spot disease complex in Western Australia. Plant Disease, 98, 790–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, H. S., You, M. P., Khan, T. N., & Barbetti, M. J. (2014b). Relative host resistance to black spot disease in field pea (Pisum sativum) is determined by individual pathogens. Plant Disease, 99, 580–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, H. S., You, M. P., Khan, T. N., Pritchard, I., & Barbetti, M. J. (2014c). Resistance in field pea (Pisum sativum) to the black spot disease complex in Western Australia. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 140, 597–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, H. S., You, M. P., Li, Y. P., Lanoiselet, V., Khan, T. N., & Barbetti, M. J. (2014d). First report of Phoma glomerata on field pea (Pisum sativum) in Australia. Plant Disease, 98, 427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J. C. (1986). Incidence and etiology of pea rots in southwestern Ontario. Canadian Plant Disease Survey, 66, 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J. C. (1987). Integrated control of the pea root rot disease complex in Ontario. Plant Disease, 71, 9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J. C. (1992). Management of root rot diseases of peas, beans, and tomatoes. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 14, 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, E., Hullé, M., & Rouxel, F. (2001). Pathogenic characteristics of isolates of Aphanomyces euteiches from pea in France. Plant Pathology, 50, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, E., & Rouxel, F. (2001). Specific behaviour of French Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs. populations for virulence and aggressiveness on pea, related to isolates from Europe, America and New Zealand. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 107, 919–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author gratefully acknowledges the financial assistance of an Australian Government Postgraduate-AUSAID Scholarship. We appreciate the operational funding support for this research provided by the School of Plant Biology at The University of Western Australia. We thank the Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia for supplying pea seeds. All confirm that they have no conflict of interest to declare regarding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin John Barbetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, H.S., You, M.P., Khan, T.N. et al. Pea black spot disease complex on field pea: dissecting the roles of the different pathogens in causing epicotyl and root disease. Eur J Plant Pathol 144, 595–605 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0798-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0798-1

Keywords

Navigation