Abstract
The use of artifacts to introduce the distributive law of multiplication over addition in primary school is a diffused approach: it is possible to find pre-constructed learning trajectories in instructional materials. However, it is still unclear how the teacher might support his/her students in transitioning from concrete to symbolic representations of the distributive law. In the theoretical frame of the Theory of Semiotic Mediation, we report on a study where Laisant’s table, an artifact embodying the rectangular model of multiplication, is used to introduce distributive law in second grade. Taking a microanalytical approach, we show how a group of students connects the representation provided by the artifact with the symbolic representation of the arithmetic property (as equivalence of numerical sentences). Two different semiotic chains are identified and presented, showing the continuity between the activity with the artifact and the mathematical signs emerging in following activities and promoted by tasks specifically designed. The role of the teacher in triggering and scaffolding this process is highlighted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Italian reading of multiplications is different from the usual English one. In Italian, 4 × 9 is read as “quattro per nove,” meaning four repeated nine times.
The phrase used by the researcher is “è uguale.” In Italian, it has different meanings according to the linguistic register. It means “it equals” in the formal-mathematical register, and it means “it looks the same as” in colloquial register.
Likely, the association of the metaphor of putting together to the operation of adding was already known by the students. Such metaphor is common in Italian textbooks for first grade.
References
Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process, Revista Latino Americana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, vol. Especial, 267–299.
Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109.
Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 429–466). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Barmby, P., Harries, T., Higgins, S., & Suggate, J. (2009). The array representation and primary children’s understanding and reasoning in multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 217–241.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 750–787). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Franke, M. L., & Zeringue, J. K. (2005). Algebra in elementary school: Developing relational thinking. ZDM, 37(1), 53–59.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Ding, M., & Li, X. (2014). Transition from concrete to abstract representation: The distributive property in a Chinese textbook series. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 103–121.
Eco, U. (1973). Segno. Milano, Italy: Isedi.
Farrugia, M. T. (2017). On semiotics and jumping frogs: The role of gesture in the teaching of subtraction. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(2), 2–7.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
Freudenthal, H. (1986). On multiplication. Mathematics Teaching, 114, 25–27.
Izsák, A. (2004). Teaching and learning two-digit multiplication: Coordinating analyses of classroom practice and individual student learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(1), 37–79.
Laisant, C. A. (1915). Initiation mathématique: ouvrage étranger à tout programme, dédié aux amis de l'enfance. Paris, France: Hachette & cie.
Larsson, K. (2015). Sixth grade students’ explanations and justifications of distributivity. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9thConference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 295–301). Praha, Czech Republic: ERME.
Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(2), 173–196.
Maffia, A. (2019). Exploiting the potential of primary historical sources in primary school: A focus on teacher’s actions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 354–368.
Maffia, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2018). Intuitive and formal models of whole numbers multiplication: Relations and emerging structures. For the Learning of Mathematics, 38(3), 30–36.
Maffia, A., & Sabena, C. (2016). Teacher gestures as pivot signs in semiotic chains. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitànyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 235–242). Szeged, Hungary: IGPME.
Mariotti, M. A. (2013). Introducing students to geometric theorems: How the teacher can exploit the semiotic potential of a DGS. ZDM, 45(3), 441–452.
Montessori, M. (1934/2016). Psychoarithmetic. Laren, the Netherlands: Montessori-Pierson Publishing.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405–435.
Radford, L., & Sabena, C. (2015). The question of method in a Vygotskian semiotic approach. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 157–182). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (2006). Classroom interpreting games with an illustration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 183–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maffia, A., Mariotti, M.A. From action to symbols: giving meaning to the symbolic representation of the distributive law in primary school. Educ Stud Math 104, 25–40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09944-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09944-5